Cargando…

Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To evaluate effects on growth and infection rates of supplementing infant formula with the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei strain F19 (F19) or bovine milk fat globule membrane (MFGM). Methods: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 600 infants were randomized to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaonan, Peng, Yongmei, Li, Zailing, Christensen, Britt, Heckmann, Anne B., Stenlund, Hans, Lönnerdal, Bo, Hernell, Olle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00347
_version_ 1783450539194843136
author Li, Xiaonan
Peng, Yongmei
Li, Zailing
Christensen, Britt
Heckmann, Anne B.
Stenlund, Hans
Lönnerdal, Bo
Hernell, Olle
author_facet Li, Xiaonan
Peng, Yongmei
Li, Zailing
Christensen, Britt
Heckmann, Anne B.
Stenlund, Hans
Lönnerdal, Bo
Hernell, Olle
author_sort Li, Xiaonan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate effects on growth and infection rates of supplementing infant formula with the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei strain F19 (F19) or bovine milk fat globule membrane (MFGM). Methods: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 600 infants were randomized to a formula supplemented with F19 or MFGM, or to standard formula (SF). A breastfed group was recruited as reference (n = 200).The intervention lasted from age 21 ± 7 days until 4 months, and infants were followed until age one year. Results: Both experimental formulas were well tolerated and resulted in high compliance. The few reported adverse events were not likely related to formula, with the highest rates in the SF group, significantly higher than for the F19-supplemented infants (p = 0.046). Weight or length gain did not differ during or after the intervention among the formula-fed groups, with satisfactory growth. During the intervention, overall, the experimental formula groups did not have more episodes of diarrhea, fever, or days with fever than the breastfed infants. However, compared to the breastfed infants, the SF group had more fever episodes (p = 0.021) and days with fever (p = 0.036), but not diarrhea. Compared with the breastfed group, the F19-supplemented infants but not the other two formula groups had more visits/unscheduled hospitalizations (p = 0.015) and borderline more episodes of upper respiratory tract infections (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Both the MFGM- and F19-supplemented formulas were safe and well-tolerated, leading to few adverse effects, similar to the breastfed group and unlike the SF group. During the intervention, the MFGM-supplemented infants did not differ from the breastfed infants in any primary outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6736587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67365872019-09-24 Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Li, Xiaonan Peng, Yongmei Li, Zailing Christensen, Britt Heckmann, Anne B. Stenlund, Hans Lönnerdal, Bo Hernell, Olle Front Pediatr Pediatrics Purpose: To evaluate effects on growth and infection rates of supplementing infant formula with the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei strain F19 (F19) or bovine milk fat globule membrane (MFGM). Methods: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 600 infants were randomized to a formula supplemented with F19 or MFGM, or to standard formula (SF). A breastfed group was recruited as reference (n = 200).The intervention lasted from age 21 ± 7 days until 4 months, and infants were followed until age one year. Results: Both experimental formulas were well tolerated and resulted in high compliance. The few reported adverse events were not likely related to formula, with the highest rates in the SF group, significantly higher than for the F19-supplemented infants (p = 0.046). Weight or length gain did not differ during or after the intervention among the formula-fed groups, with satisfactory growth. During the intervention, overall, the experimental formula groups did not have more episodes of diarrhea, fever, or days with fever than the breastfed infants. However, compared to the breastfed infants, the SF group had more fever episodes (p = 0.021) and days with fever (p = 0.036), but not diarrhea. Compared with the breastfed group, the F19-supplemented infants but not the other two formula groups had more visits/unscheduled hospitalizations (p = 0.015) and borderline more episodes of upper respiratory tract infections (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Both the MFGM- and F19-supplemented formulas were safe and well-tolerated, leading to few adverse effects, similar to the breastfed group and unlike the SF group. During the intervention, the MFGM-supplemented infants did not differ from the breastfed infants in any primary outcome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6736587/ /pubmed/31552203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00347 Text en Copyright © 2019 Li, Peng, Li, Christensen, Heckmann, Stenlund, Lönnerdal and Hernell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Li, Xiaonan
Peng, Yongmei
Li, Zailing
Christensen, Britt
Heckmann, Anne B.
Stenlund, Hans
Lönnerdal, Bo
Hernell, Olle
Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Feeding Infants Formula With Probiotics or Milk Fat Globule Membrane: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort feeding infants formula with probiotics or milk fat globule membrane: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00347
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaonan feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pengyongmei feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lizailing feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christensenbritt feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heckmannanneb feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stenlundhans feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lonnerdalbo feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hernellolle feedinginfantsformulawithprobioticsormilkfatglobulemembraneadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial