Cargando…
What understanding of economics do medical students have?
Introduction: Economic topics appear in the medical studies curriculum at different times. Despite socio-political relevance, there is hardly any information about the degree of understanding that medical students have of “economics in medicine”. The present study addresses the questions: What under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31544141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001249 |
_version_ | 1783450632166834176 |
---|---|
author | Spura, Anke Werwick, Katrin Robra, Bernt-Peter Stallmann, Christoph March, Stefanie Ladebeck, Nadine Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger Stieger, Philipp |
author_facet | Spura, Anke Werwick, Katrin Robra, Bernt-Peter Stallmann, Christoph March, Stefanie Ladebeck, Nadine Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger Stieger, Philipp |
author_sort | Spura, Anke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Economic topics appear in the medical studies curriculum at different times. Despite socio-political relevance, there is hardly any information about the degree of understanding that medical students have of “economics in medicine”. The present study addresses the questions: What understanding of “economics in medicine” do medical students have before the start of the Practical Year? To what extent is economic teaching content understood as “economization” from outside the profession? Method: Magdeburg medical students in the 5(th) year of study, who participated in preparatory seminars for the Practical Year (PY) in 2014 and 2015 (60 participants each), assessed the relevance of various seminar topics four months prior to the start of the semester. On the basis of a three-stage qualitative-reconstructive partial evaluation, students’ economic understanding is explored through secondary analysis: 1. deductive derivation of the analysis units; ; 2. integrative basic method (“segmentation”, “micro-linguistic detailed analysis”, “central theme”); ; 3. development of a theoretical model by placing the central themes in context following Grounded Theory. . Results: Based on the theory, 19 free-text answers with economic reference were identified from the total of all free-text answers. Each answer was assigned to at least one of a total of six themes of the students’ understanding of economics: 1. de-professionalizing economization, ; 2. deciding and working economically, ; 3. ambivalent requirements for efficiency and equity, ; 4. the doctor as an entrepreneur, ; 5. economics as relevant learning content, . 6. PY as a conflict-laden setting for economized working and learning. . The theoretical model contains social, praxeological and professional references, which can themselves be ambivalent and conflicting. Conclusion: Despite their critical attitude, the surveyed medical students are neither hostile to economics nor do they regard economics in medicine as a taboo subject. Economic learning content is recognized as relevant. Educational formats that tackle the tension between patient and system orientation in a problem-oriented manner can be a productive setting for economic reflection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6737257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67372572019-09-20 What understanding of economics do medical students have? Spura, Anke Werwick, Katrin Robra, Bernt-Peter Stallmann, Christoph March, Stefanie Ladebeck, Nadine Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger Stieger, Philipp GMS J Med Educ Article Introduction: Economic topics appear in the medical studies curriculum at different times. Despite socio-political relevance, there is hardly any information about the degree of understanding that medical students have of “economics in medicine”. The present study addresses the questions: What understanding of “economics in medicine” do medical students have before the start of the Practical Year? To what extent is economic teaching content understood as “economization” from outside the profession? Method: Magdeburg medical students in the 5(th) year of study, who participated in preparatory seminars for the Practical Year (PY) in 2014 and 2015 (60 participants each), assessed the relevance of various seminar topics four months prior to the start of the semester. On the basis of a three-stage qualitative-reconstructive partial evaluation, students’ economic understanding is explored through secondary analysis: 1. deductive derivation of the analysis units; ; 2. integrative basic method (“segmentation”, “micro-linguistic detailed analysis”, “central theme”); ; 3. development of a theoretical model by placing the central themes in context following Grounded Theory. . Results: Based on the theory, 19 free-text answers with economic reference were identified from the total of all free-text answers. Each answer was assigned to at least one of a total of six themes of the students’ understanding of economics: 1. de-professionalizing economization, ; 2. deciding and working economically, ; 3. ambivalent requirements for efficiency and equity, ; 4. the doctor as an entrepreneur, ; 5. economics as relevant learning content, . 6. PY as a conflict-laden setting for economized working and learning. . The theoretical model contains social, praxeological and professional references, which can themselves be ambivalent and conflicting. Conclusion: Despite their critical attitude, the surveyed medical students are neither hostile to economics nor do they regard economics in medicine as a taboo subject. Economic learning content is recognized as relevant. Educational formats that tackle the tension between patient and system orientation in a problem-oriented manner can be a productive setting for economic reflection. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6737257/ /pubmed/31544141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001249 Text en Copyright © 2019 Spura et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Spura, Anke Werwick, Katrin Robra, Bernt-Peter Stallmann, Christoph March, Stefanie Ladebeck, Nadine Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger Stieger, Philipp What understanding of economics do medical students have? |
title | What understanding of economics do medical students have? |
title_full | What understanding of economics do medical students have? |
title_fullStr | What understanding of economics do medical students have? |
title_full_unstemmed | What understanding of economics do medical students have? |
title_short | What understanding of economics do medical students have? |
title_sort | what understanding of economics do medical students have? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31544141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spuraanke whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT werwickkatrin whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT robraberntpeter whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT stallmannchristoph whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT marchstefanie whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT ladebecknadine whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT braundullaeusrudiger whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave AT stiegerphilipp whatunderstandingofeconomicsdomedicalstudentshave |