Cargando…

What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis

Aim: In the final (practical) year (PY), students have the opportunity to become familiar with their potential future place of work. At the same time, university hospitals and teaching hospitals compete to recruit the best junior staff from this pool. The aim of this study is to present students...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Homberg, Angelika, Narciß, Elisabeth, Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31544138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001246
_version_ 1783450634991697920
author Homberg, Angelika
Narciß, Elisabeth
Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
author_facet Homberg, Angelika
Narciß, Elisabeth
Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
author_sort Homberg, Angelika
collection PubMed
description Aim: In the final (practical) year (PY), students have the opportunity to become familiar with their potential future place of work. At the same time, university hospitals and teaching hospitals compete to recruit the best junior staff from this pool. The aim of this study is to present students' selection criteria for the location of the final year in detail. Methods: On the formal evaluation of the final year at the Mannheim Medical Faculty, students were asked after each training period which reasons led to the selection of the location. Thirty-one subcategories were formed from the free-text responses, sorted according to their controllability and then grouped into 11 main categories. The Mannheim University Hospital introduced an expense allowance in November 2015. The data from the period before and after its introduction, the reasons given for choosing the location for the compulsory and elective subjects, and the reasons given for choosing a teaching hospital or university hospital were evaluated and compared separately. Results: A total of 1,164 questionnaires were evaluated from the period before the introduction of the expense allowance, and 1,120 questionnaires were evaluated from the period after the introduction. Overall, Proximity (19%), Financial incentives (18%) and Subject (18%) were the most frequently cited reasons. The Financial incentives subcategory was the most frequent in period 1 (32%), but lost relevance in period 2 (6%). In contrast, Recommendation gained in importance (from 8% to 15%). A comparison of the lead categories shows that teaching hospitals benefit more from their public image and university hospitals more from the subjects they offer. Conclusion: Students primarily choose the location for their final year for pragmatic reasons, such as Incentives and Living environment, but the Public image of the hospitals also plays a significant role. The frequency of the reasons given differs between compulsory and elective subjects, as well as between university hospitals and teaching hospitals. The results can help to improve the attractiveness of the location in a targeted manner and to present a specific image to the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67372692019-09-20 What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis Homberg, Angelika Narciß, Elisabeth Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin GMS J Med Educ Article Aim: In the final (practical) year (PY), students have the opportunity to become familiar with their potential future place of work. At the same time, university hospitals and teaching hospitals compete to recruit the best junior staff from this pool. The aim of this study is to present students' selection criteria for the location of the final year in detail. Methods: On the formal evaluation of the final year at the Mannheim Medical Faculty, students were asked after each training period which reasons led to the selection of the location. Thirty-one subcategories were formed from the free-text responses, sorted according to their controllability and then grouped into 11 main categories. The Mannheim University Hospital introduced an expense allowance in November 2015. The data from the period before and after its introduction, the reasons given for choosing the location for the compulsory and elective subjects, and the reasons given for choosing a teaching hospital or university hospital were evaluated and compared separately. Results: A total of 1,164 questionnaires were evaluated from the period before the introduction of the expense allowance, and 1,120 questionnaires were evaluated from the period after the introduction. Overall, Proximity (19%), Financial incentives (18%) and Subject (18%) were the most frequently cited reasons. The Financial incentives subcategory was the most frequent in period 1 (32%), but lost relevance in period 2 (6%). In contrast, Recommendation gained in importance (from 8% to 15%). A comparison of the lead categories shows that teaching hospitals benefit more from their public image and university hospitals more from the subjects they offer. Conclusion: Students primarily choose the location for their final year for pragmatic reasons, such as Incentives and Living environment, but the Public image of the hospitals also plays a significant role. The frequency of the reasons given differs between compulsory and elective subjects, as well as between university hospitals and teaching hospitals. The results can help to improve the attractiveness of the location in a targeted manner and to present a specific image to the public. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6737269/ /pubmed/31544138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001246 Text en Copyright © 2019 Homberg et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Homberg, Angelika
Narciß, Elisabeth
Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis
title What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis
title_full What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis
title_fullStr What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis
title_full_unstemmed What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis
title_short What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis
title_sort what reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? a quantitative content analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31544138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001246
work_keys_str_mv AT hombergangelika whatreasonsdofinalyearmedicalstudentsgiveforchoosingthehospitalsfortheirclinicaltrainingphasesaquantitativecontentanalysis
AT narcißelisabeth whatreasonsdofinalyearmedicalstudentsgiveforchoosingthehospitalsfortheirclinicaltrainingphasesaquantitativecontentanalysis
AT schuttpelzbraunskatrin whatreasonsdofinalyearmedicalstudentsgiveforchoosingthehospitalsfortheirclinicaltrainingphasesaquantitativecontentanalysis