Cargando…

Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation

MOTIVATION: With high-throughput genotyping systems now available, it has become feasible to fully integrate genotyping information into breeding programs. To make use of this information effectively requires DNA extraction facilities and marker production facilities that can efficiently deploy the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nti-Addae, Yaw, Matthews, Dave, Ulat, Victor Jun, Syed, Raza, Sempéré, Guilhem, Pétel, Adrien, Renner, Jon, Larmande, Pierre, Guignon, Valentin, Jones, Elizabeth, Robbins, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31508797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz096
_version_ 1783450663049494528
author Nti-Addae, Yaw
Matthews, Dave
Ulat, Victor Jun
Syed, Raza
Sempéré, Guilhem
Pétel, Adrien
Renner, Jon
Larmande, Pierre
Guignon, Valentin
Jones, Elizabeth
Robbins, Kelly
author_facet Nti-Addae, Yaw
Matthews, Dave
Ulat, Victor Jun
Syed, Raza
Sempéré, Guilhem
Pétel, Adrien
Renner, Jon
Larmande, Pierre
Guignon, Valentin
Jones, Elizabeth
Robbins, Kelly
author_sort Nti-Addae, Yaw
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: With high-throughput genotyping systems now available, it has become feasible to fully integrate genotyping information into breeding programs. To make use of this information effectively requires DNA extraction facilities and marker production facilities that can efficiently deploy the desired set of markers across samples with a rapid turnaround time that allows for selection before crosses needed to be made. In reality, breeders often have a short window of time to make decisions by the time they are able to collect all their phenotyping data and receive corresponding genotyping data. This presents a challenge to organize information and utilize it in downstream analyses to support decisions made by breeders. In order to implement genomic selection routinely as part of breeding programs, one would need an efficient genotyping data storage system. We selected and benchmarked six popular open-source data storage systems, including relational database management and columnar storage systems. RESULTS: We found that data extract times are greatly influenced by the orientation in which genotype data is stored in a system. HDF5 consistently performed best, in part because it can more efficiently work with both orientations of the allele matrix. AVAILABILITY: http://gobiin1.bti.cornell.edu:6083/projects/GBM/repos/benchmarking/browse
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67374642019-09-16 Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation Nti-Addae, Yaw Matthews, Dave Ulat, Victor Jun Syed, Raza Sempéré, Guilhem Pétel, Adrien Renner, Jon Larmande, Pierre Guignon, Valentin Jones, Elizabeth Robbins, Kelly Database (Oxford) Review MOTIVATION: With high-throughput genotyping systems now available, it has become feasible to fully integrate genotyping information into breeding programs. To make use of this information effectively requires DNA extraction facilities and marker production facilities that can efficiently deploy the desired set of markers across samples with a rapid turnaround time that allows for selection before crosses needed to be made. In reality, breeders often have a short window of time to make decisions by the time they are able to collect all their phenotyping data and receive corresponding genotyping data. This presents a challenge to organize information and utilize it in downstream analyses to support decisions made by breeders. In order to implement genomic selection routinely as part of breeding programs, one would need an efficient genotyping data storage system. We selected and benchmarked six popular open-source data storage systems, including relational database management and columnar storage systems. RESULTS: We found that data extract times are greatly influenced by the orientation in which genotype data is stored in a system. HDF5 consistently performed best, in part because it can more efficiently work with both orientations of the allele matrix. AVAILABILITY: http://gobiin1.bti.cornell.edu:6083/projects/GBM/repos/benchmarking/browse Oxford University Press 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737464/ /pubmed/31508797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz096 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Nti-Addae, Yaw
Matthews, Dave
Ulat, Victor Jun
Syed, Raza
Sempéré, Guilhem
Pétel, Adrien
Renner, Jon
Larmande, Pierre
Guignon, Valentin
Jones, Elizabeth
Robbins, Kelly
Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation
title Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation
title_full Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation
title_fullStr Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation
title_short Benchmarking database systems for Genomic Selection implementation
title_sort benchmarking database systems for genomic selection implementation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31508797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz096
work_keys_str_mv AT ntiaddaeyaw benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT matthewsdave benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT ulatvictorjun benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT syedraza benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT sempereguilhem benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT peteladrien benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT rennerjon benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT larmandepierre benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT guignonvalentin benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT joneselizabeth benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation
AT robbinskelly benchmarkingdatabasesystemsforgenomicselectionimplementation