Cargando…
Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer
PURPOSE: Monotherapy with high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy are both recommended modalities for prostate cancer. The choice between HDR and LDR is dependent on patient, physician, and hospital preferences. We sought to identify treatment patterns and factors associated with r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523232 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.86974 |
_version_ | 1783450676985069568 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Justin Kennedy, William R Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W Baumann, Brian C Michalski, Jeff M Gay, Hiram A |
author_facet | Barnes, Justin Kennedy, William R Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W Baumann, Brian C Michalski, Jeff M Gay, Hiram A |
author_sort | Barnes, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Monotherapy with high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy are both recommended modalities for prostate cancer. The choice between HDR and LDR is dependent on patient, physician, and hospital preferences. We sought to identify treatment patterns and factors associated with receipt of HDR or LDR monotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with HDR or LDR monotherapy. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patterns of HDR vs. LDR. Patient characteristics were correlated with HDR vs. LDR using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 50,326 patients from 2004-2014: LDR 37,863 (75.2%) vs. HDR 12,463 (24.8%). Median follow-up was 70.3 months. The overall use of monotherapy declined over time. HDR application declined relative to LDR. In 2004, 27.0% of cases were HDR compared to 19.2% in 2014. Factors associated with increased likelihood of HDR on multivariable analysis included: increasing age (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.01), cT2c disease (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41), treatment at an academic center (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 2.24-2.65), non-white race (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.27-1.42), and income > $63,000 (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.59-1.88). LDR was more common in 2010-2014 (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.54-0.65), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index > 0 (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95), and for patients receiving hormone therapy (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93). No difference in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or Gleason score and receipt of HDR vs. LDR was observed. Mean overall survival was 127.0 months for HDR and 125.4 for LDR, and was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an overall decrease in brachytherapy (BT) monotherapy use since 2004 for localized prostate cancer. Despite similar survival outcomes, the use of HDR monotherapy declined relative to LDR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6737564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67375642019-09-13 Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer Barnes, Justin Kennedy, William R Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W Baumann, Brian C Michalski, Jeff M Gay, Hiram A J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Monotherapy with high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy are both recommended modalities for prostate cancer. The choice between HDR and LDR is dependent on patient, physician, and hospital preferences. We sought to identify treatment patterns and factors associated with receipt of HDR or LDR monotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with HDR or LDR monotherapy. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patterns of HDR vs. LDR. Patient characteristics were correlated with HDR vs. LDR using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 50,326 patients from 2004-2014: LDR 37,863 (75.2%) vs. HDR 12,463 (24.8%). Median follow-up was 70.3 months. The overall use of monotherapy declined over time. HDR application declined relative to LDR. In 2004, 27.0% of cases were HDR compared to 19.2% in 2014. Factors associated with increased likelihood of HDR on multivariable analysis included: increasing age (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.01), cT2c disease (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41), treatment at an academic center (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 2.24-2.65), non-white race (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.27-1.42), and income > $63,000 (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.59-1.88). LDR was more common in 2010-2014 (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.54-0.65), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index > 0 (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95), and for patients receiving hormone therapy (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93). No difference in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or Gleason score and receipt of HDR vs. LDR was observed. Mean overall survival was 127.0 months for HDR and 125.4 for LDR, and was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an overall decrease in brachytherapy (BT) monotherapy use since 2004 for localized prostate cancer. Despite similar survival outcomes, the use of HDR monotherapy declined relative to LDR. Termedia Publishing House 2019-08-29 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6737564/ /pubmed/31523232 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.86974 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Barnes, Justin Kennedy, William R Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W Baumann, Brian C Michalski, Jeff M Gay, Hiram A Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
title | Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
title_full | Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
title_short | Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
title_sort | treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523232 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.86974 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnesjustin treatmentpatternsofhighdoserateandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyforprostatecancer AT kennedywilliamr treatmentpatternsofhighdoserateandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyforprostatecancer AT fischervaluckbenjaminw treatmentpatternsofhighdoserateandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyforprostatecancer AT baumannbrianc treatmentpatternsofhighdoserateandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyforprostatecancer AT michalskijeffm treatmentpatternsofhighdoserateandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyforprostatecancer AT gayhirama treatmentpatternsofhighdoserateandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyforprostatecancer |