Cargando…

Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors

BACKGROUND: Population attributable fractions (PAF) measure the proportion of disease prevalence that would be avoided in a hypothetical population, similar to the population of interest, but where a particular risk factor is eliminated. They are extensively used in epidemiology to quantify and comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, John, O’Leary, Neil, Maturo, Fabrizio, Yusuf, Salim, O’Donnell, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4
_version_ 1783450687601901568
author Ferguson, John
O’Leary, Neil
Maturo, Fabrizio
Yusuf, Salim
O’Donnell, Martin
author_facet Ferguson, John
O’Leary, Neil
Maturo, Fabrizio
Yusuf, Salim
O’Donnell, Martin
author_sort Ferguson, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Population attributable fractions (PAF) measure the proportion of disease prevalence that would be avoided in a hypothetical population, similar to the population of interest, but where a particular risk factor is eliminated. They are extensively used in epidemiology to quantify and compare disease burden due to various risk factors, and directly influence public policy regarding possible health interventions. In contrast to individual specific metrics such as relative risks and odds ratios, attributable fractions depend jointly on both risk factor prevalence and relative risk. The relative contributions of these two components is important, and usually needs to be presented in summary tables that are presented together with the attributable fraction calculation. However, representing PAF in an accessible graphical format, that captures both prevalence and relative risk, may assist interpretation. METHODS: Taylor-series approximations to PAF in terms of risk factor prevalence and log-odds ratio are derived that facilitate simultaneous representation of PAF, risk factor prevalence and risk-factor/disease log-odds ratios on a single co-ordinate axis. Methods are developed for binary, multi-category and continuous exposure variables. RESULTS: The methods are demonstrated using INTERSTROKE, a large international case control dataset focused on risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The described methods could be used as a complement to tables summarizing prevalence, odds ratios and PAF, and may convey the same information in a more intuitive and visually appealing manner. The suggested nomogram can also be used to visually estimate the effects of health interventions which only partially reduce risk factor prevalence. Finally, in the binary risk factor case, the approximations can also be used to quickly convert logistic regression coefficients for a risk factor into approximate PAFs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67376082019-09-16 Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors Ferguson, John O’Leary, Neil Maturo, Fabrizio Yusuf, Salim O’Donnell, Martin BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Population attributable fractions (PAF) measure the proportion of disease prevalence that would be avoided in a hypothetical population, similar to the population of interest, but where a particular risk factor is eliminated. They are extensively used in epidemiology to quantify and compare disease burden due to various risk factors, and directly influence public policy regarding possible health interventions. In contrast to individual specific metrics such as relative risks and odds ratios, attributable fractions depend jointly on both risk factor prevalence and relative risk. The relative contributions of these two components is important, and usually needs to be presented in summary tables that are presented together with the attributable fraction calculation. However, representing PAF in an accessible graphical format, that captures both prevalence and relative risk, may assist interpretation. METHODS: Taylor-series approximations to PAF in terms of risk factor prevalence and log-odds ratio are derived that facilitate simultaneous representation of PAF, risk factor prevalence and risk-factor/disease log-odds ratios on a single co-ordinate axis. Methods are developed for binary, multi-category and continuous exposure variables. RESULTS: The methods are demonstrated using INTERSTROKE, a large international case control dataset focused on risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The described methods could be used as a complement to tables summarizing prevalence, odds ratios and PAF, and may convey the same information in a more intuitive and visually appealing manner. The suggested nomogram can also be used to visually estimate the effects of health interventions which only partially reduce risk factor prevalence. Finally, in the binary risk factor case, the approximations can also be used to quickly convert logistic regression coefficients for a risk factor into approximate PAFs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737608/ /pubmed/31506063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferguson, John
O’Leary, Neil
Maturo, Fabrizio
Yusuf, Salim
O’Donnell, Martin
Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
title Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
title_full Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
title_fullStr Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
title_short Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
title_sort graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonjohn graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors
AT olearyneil graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors
AT maturofabrizio graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors
AT yusufsalim graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors
AT odonnellmartin graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors