Cargando…
Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors
BACKGROUND: Population attributable fractions (PAF) measure the proportion of disease prevalence that would be avoided in a hypothetical population, similar to the population of interest, but where a particular risk factor is eliminated. They are extensively used in epidemiology to quantify and comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4 |
_version_ | 1783450687601901568 |
---|---|
author | Ferguson, John O’Leary, Neil Maturo, Fabrizio Yusuf, Salim O’Donnell, Martin |
author_facet | Ferguson, John O’Leary, Neil Maturo, Fabrizio Yusuf, Salim O’Donnell, Martin |
author_sort | Ferguson, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Population attributable fractions (PAF) measure the proportion of disease prevalence that would be avoided in a hypothetical population, similar to the population of interest, but where a particular risk factor is eliminated. They are extensively used in epidemiology to quantify and compare disease burden due to various risk factors, and directly influence public policy regarding possible health interventions. In contrast to individual specific metrics such as relative risks and odds ratios, attributable fractions depend jointly on both risk factor prevalence and relative risk. The relative contributions of these two components is important, and usually needs to be presented in summary tables that are presented together with the attributable fraction calculation. However, representing PAF in an accessible graphical format, that captures both prevalence and relative risk, may assist interpretation. METHODS: Taylor-series approximations to PAF in terms of risk factor prevalence and log-odds ratio are derived that facilitate simultaneous representation of PAF, risk factor prevalence and risk-factor/disease log-odds ratios on a single co-ordinate axis. Methods are developed for binary, multi-category and continuous exposure variables. RESULTS: The methods are demonstrated using INTERSTROKE, a large international case control dataset focused on risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The described methods could be used as a complement to tables summarizing prevalence, odds ratios and PAF, and may convey the same information in a more intuitive and visually appealing manner. The suggested nomogram can also be used to visually estimate the effects of health interventions which only partially reduce risk factor prevalence. Finally, in the binary risk factor case, the approximations can also be used to quickly convert logistic regression coefficients for a risk factor into approximate PAFs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6737608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67376082019-09-16 Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors Ferguson, John O’Leary, Neil Maturo, Fabrizio Yusuf, Salim O’Donnell, Martin BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Population attributable fractions (PAF) measure the proportion of disease prevalence that would be avoided in a hypothetical population, similar to the population of interest, but where a particular risk factor is eliminated. They are extensively used in epidemiology to quantify and compare disease burden due to various risk factors, and directly influence public policy regarding possible health interventions. In contrast to individual specific metrics such as relative risks and odds ratios, attributable fractions depend jointly on both risk factor prevalence and relative risk. The relative contributions of these two components is important, and usually needs to be presented in summary tables that are presented together with the attributable fraction calculation. However, representing PAF in an accessible graphical format, that captures both prevalence and relative risk, may assist interpretation. METHODS: Taylor-series approximations to PAF in terms of risk factor prevalence and log-odds ratio are derived that facilitate simultaneous representation of PAF, risk factor prevalence and risk-factor/disease log-odds ratios on a single co-ordinate axis. Methods are developed for binary, multi-category and continuous exposure variables. RESULTS: The methods are demonstrated using INTERSTROKE, a large international case control dataset focused on risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The described methods could be used as a complement to tables summarizing prevalence, odds ratios and PAF, and may convey the same information in a more intuitive and visually appealing manner. The suggested nomogram can also be used to visually estimate the effects of health interventions which only partially reduce risk factor prevalence. Finally, in the binary risk factor case, the approximations can also be used to quickly convert logistic regression coefficients for a risk factor into approximate PAFs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737608/ /pubmed/31506063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferguson, John O’Leary, Neil Maturo, Fabrizio Yusuf, Salim O’Donnell, Martin Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
title | Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
title_full | Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
title_fullStr | Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
title_short | Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
title_sort | graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0827-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fergusonjohn graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors AT olearyneil graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors AT maturofabrizio graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors AT yusufsalim graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors AT odonnellmartin graphicalcomparisonsofrelativediseaseburdenacrossmultipleriskfactors |