Cargando…

Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations

BACKGROUND: Quality issues in pharmaceuticals are identified as a huge global and public health problem, especially with reference to low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan. The 2011 “Fake Drug Crisis” acted as a driving force to reform the regulatory structures of the country and for establ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasheed, Huma, Hoellein, Ludwig, Bukhari, Khalid Saeed, Holzgrabe, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0184-z
_version_ 1783450689056276480
author Rasheed, Huma
Hoellein, Ludwig
Bukhari, Khalid Saeed
Holzgrabe, Ulrike
author_facet Rasheed, Huma
Hoellein, Ludwig
Bukhari, Khalid Saeed
Holzgrabe, Ulrike
author_sort Rasheed, Huma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality issues in pharmaceuticals are identified as a huge global and public health problem, especially with reference to low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan. The 2011 “Fake Drug Crisis” acted as a driving force to reform the regulatory structures of the country and for establishing the autonomous “Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan”. Despite the fact that Pakistan possesses a huge pharmaceutical industry, there is a severe dearth of published literature and scientific evidence for the country regarding medicine quality and the prevalence of counterfeit and low-quality products, respectively. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This narrative review covers relevant features of the regulatory framework for pharmaceuticals in Pakistan, its national pharmaceutical industry, as well as a compilation and analysis of published literature for documentation of the country’s situation regarding the overall quality of medicines. METHODS: Available data including scientific publications on the quality of pharmaceuticals in peer reviewed journals, research reports, notifications, and alerts issued by the World Health Organization and other agencies were accessed and compiled. Post graduate dissertations were used to represent unpublished research data and drug safety alerts issued from the local Pakistan authority were analysed to assess the type and number of quality failures reported for pharmaceuticals. RESULTS: It could be clearly shown that there is negligible scientific data available on the issue of medicine quality in Pakistan. The anticipated number of 40–50% of poor-quality drugs in Pakistan cannot be defended by data available from the literature. Accessible technologies and strategies used in recent years at global level, especially in developing countries, were also reviewed and recommendations are devised for Pakistan to combat the fight against poor-quality medicines. CONCLUSION: The case reports, investigations, and general data listed for Pakistan suggest the need of strengthening regulatory systems for premises and GMP inspections, analytical laboratories, as well as an overall capacity building in the field of unravelling and controlling substandard and falsified medicines. It is proposed that well-planned and properly funded studies need to be carried out for collecting critical statistics regarding the prevalence of substandard and falsified medicines in Pakistan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67376142019-09-16 Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations Rasheed, Huma Hoellein, Ludwig Bukhari, Khalid Saeed Holzgrabe, Ulrike J Pharm Policy Pract Review BACKGROUND: Quality issues in pharmaceuticals are identified as a huge global and public health problem, especially with reference to low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan. The 2011 “Fake Drug Crisis” acted as a driving force to reform the regulatory structures of the country and for establishing the autonomous “Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan”. Despite the fact that Pakistan possesses a huge pharmaceutical industry, there is a severe dearth of published literature and scientific evidence for the country regarding medicine quality and the prevalence of counterfeit and low-quality products, respectively. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This narrative review covers relevant features of the regulatory framework for pharmaceuticals in Pakistan, its national pharmaceutical industry, as well as a compilation and analysis of published literature for documentation of the country’s situation regarding the overall quality of medicines. METHODS: Available data including scientific publications on the quality of pharmaceuticals in peer reviewed journals, research reports, notifications, and alerts issued by the World Health Organization and other agencies were accessed and compiled. Post graduate dissertations were used to represent unpublished research data and drug safety alerts issued from the local Pakistan authority were analysed to assess the type and number of quality failures reported for pharmaceuticals. RESULTS: It could be clearly shown that there is negligible scientific data available on the issue of medicine quality in Pakistan. The anticipated number of 40–50% of poor-quality drugs in Pakistan cannot be defended by data available from the literature. Accessible technologies and strategies used in recent years at global level, especially in developing countries, were also reviewed and recommendations are devised for Pakistan to combat the fight against poor-quality medicines. CONCLUSION: The case reports, investigations, and general data listed for Pakistan suggest the need of strengthening regulatory systems for premises and GMP inspections, analytical laboratories, as well as an overall capacity building in the field of unravelling and controlling substandard and falsified medicines. It is proposed that well-planned and properly funded studies need to be carried out for collecting critical statistics regarding the prevalence of substandard and falsified medicines in Pakistan. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737614/ /pubmed/31528352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0184-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Rasheed, Huma
Hoellein, Ludwig
Bukhari, Khalid Saeed
Holzgrabe, Ulrike
Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
title Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
title_full Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
title_fullStr Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
title_short Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
title_sort regulatory framework in pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0184-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rasheedhuma regulatoryframeworkinpakistansituationanalysisofmedicinequalityandfuturerecommendations
AT hoelleinludwig regulatoryframeworkinpakistansituationanalysisofmedicinequalityandfuturerecommendations
AT bukharikhalidsaeed regulatoryframeworkinpakistansituationanalysisofmedicinequalityandfuturerecommendations
AT holzgrabeulrike regulatoryframeworkinpakistansituationanalysisofmedicinequalityandfuturerecommendations