Cargando…

Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, multiple large randomized controlled trials have studied alternative transfusion strategies in critically ill patients, demonstrating the safety of restrictive transfusion strategies. Due to the lack of international guidelines specific for the intensive care unit (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bruin, Sanne, Scheeren, Thomas W. L., Bakker, Jan, van Bruggen, Robin, Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31511083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2591-6
_version_ 1783450689831174144
author de Bruin, Sanne
Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
Bakker, Jan
van Bruggen, Robin
Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
author_facet de Bruin, Sanne
Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
Bakker, Jan
van Bruggen, Robin
Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
author_sort de Bruin, Sanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, multiple large randomized controlled trials have studied alternative transfusion strategies in critically ill patients, demonstrating the safety of restrictive transfusion strategies. Due to the lack of international guidelines specific for the intensive care unit (ICU), we hypothesized that a large heterogeneity in transfusion practice in this patient population exists. The aims of this study were to describe the current transfusion practices and identify the knowledge gaps. METHODS: An online, anonymous, worldwide survey among ICU physicians was performed evaluating red blood cell, platelet and plasma transfusion practices. Furthermore, the presence of a hospital- or ICU-specific transfusion guideline was asked. Only completed surveys were analysed. RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-seven respondents filled in the survey of which 725 could be analysed. Hospital transfusion protocol available in their ICU was reported by 53% of the respondents. Only 29% of respondents used an ICU-specific transfusion guideline. The reported haemoglobin (Hb) threshold for the general ICU population was 7 g/dL (7–7). The highest reported variation in transfusion threshold was in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or with brain injury (8 g/dL (7.0–9.0)). Platelets were transfused at a median count of 20 × 10(9) cells/L IQR (10–25) in asymptomatic patients, but at a higher count prior to invasive procedures (p < 0.001). In patients with an international normalized ratio (INR) > 3, 43% and 57% of the respondents would consider plasma transfusion without any upcoming procedures or prior to a planned invasive procedure, respectively. Finally, doctors with base specialty in anaesthesiology transfused critically ill patients more liberally compared to internal medicine physicians. CONCLUSION: Red blood cell transfusion practice for the general ICU population is restrictive, while for different subpopulations, higher Hb thresholds are applied. Furthermore, practice in plasma and platelet transfusion is heterogeneous, and local transfusion guidelines are lacking in the majority of the ICUs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2591-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67376172019-09-16 Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey de Bruin, Sanne Scheeren, Thomas W. L. Bakker, Jan van Bruggen, Robin Vlaar, Alexander P. J. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, multiple large randomized controlled trials have studied alternative transfusion strategies in critically ill patients, demonstrating the safety of restrictive transfusion strategies. Due to the lack of international guidelines specific for the intensive care unit (ICU), we hypothesized that a large heterogeneity in transfusion practice in this patient population exists. The aims of this study were to describe the current transfusion practices and identify the knowledge gaps. METHODS: An online, anonymous, worldwide survey among ICU physicians was performed evaluating red blood cell, platelet and plasma transfusion practices. Furthermore, the presence of a hospital- or ICU-specific transfusion guideline was asked. Only completed surveys were analysed. RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-seven respondents filled in the survey of which 725 could be analysed. Hospital transfusion protocol available in their ICU was reported by 53% of the respondents. Only 29% of respondents used an ICU-specific transfusion guideline. The reported haemoglobin (Hb) threshold for the general ICU population was 7 g/dL (7–7). The highest reported variation in transfusion threshold was in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or with brain injury (8 g/dL (7.0–9.0)). Platelets were transfused at a median count of 20 × 10(9) cells/L IQR (10–25) in asymptomatic patients, but at a higher count prior to invasive procedures (p < 0.001). In patients with an international normalized ratio (INR) > 3, 43% and 57% of the respondents would consider plasma transfusion without any upcoming procedures or prior to a planned invasive procedure, respectively. Finally, doctors with base specialty in anaesthesiology transfused critically ill patients more liberally compared to internal medicine physicians. CONCLUSION: Red blood cell transfusion practice for the general ICU population is restrictive, while for different subpopulations, higher Hb thresholds are applied. Furthermore, practice in plasma and platelet transfusion is heterogeneous, and local transfusion guidelines are lacking in the majority of the ICUs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2591-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737617/ /pubmed/31511083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2591-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
de Bruin, Sanne
Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
Bakker, Jan
van Bruggen, Robin
Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey
title Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey
title_full Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey
title_fullStr Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey
title_full_unstemmed Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey
title_short Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey
title_sort transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the trace survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31511083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2591-6
work_keys_str_mv AT debruinsanne transfusionpracticeinthenonbleedingcriticallyillaninternationalonlinesurveythetracesurvey
AT scheerenthomaswl transfusionpracticeinthenonbleedingcriticallyillaninternationalonlinesurveythetracesurvey
AT bakkerjan transfusionpracticeinthenonbleedingcriticallyillaninternationalonlinesurveythetracesurvey
AT vanbruggenrobin transfusionpracticeinthenonbleedingcriticallyillaninternationalonlinesurveythetracesurvey
AT vlaaralexanderpj transfusionpracticeinthenonbleedingcriticallyillaninternationalonlinesurveythetracesurvey
AT transfusionpracticeinthenonbleedingcriticallyillaninternationalonlinesurveythetracesurvey