Cargando…

Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Within the field of plastic surgery, free tissue transfer is common practice for knee and lower leg defects. Usually, after such free flap reconstruction, patients undergo a dangling protocol in the postoperative phase. A dangling protocol is designed to gradually subject the free flap t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krijgh, David D., Teunis, Teun, Schellekens, Pascal P. A., Mureau, Marc A. M., Luijsterburg, Antonius J. M., Tempelman, Tallechien M. T., van der Beek, Eva S. J., Maarse, Wiesje, Coert, J. Henk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31511052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3665-0
_version_ 1783450699824103424
author Krijgh, David D.
Teunis, Teun
Schellekens, Pascal P. A.
Mureau, Marc A. M.
Luijsterburg, Antonius J. M.
Tempelman, Tallechien M. T.
van der Beek, Eva S. J.
Maarse, Wiesje
Coert, J. Henk
author_facet Krijgh, David D.
Teunis, Teun
Schellekens, Pascal P. A.
Mureau, Marc A. M.
Luijsterburg, Antonius J. M.
Tempelman, Tallechien M. T.
van der Beek, Eva S. J.
Maarse, Wiesje
Coert, J. Henk
author_sort Krijgh, David D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the field of plastic surgery, free tissue transfer is common practice for knee and lower leg defects. Usually, after such free flap reconstruction, patients undergo a dangling protocol in the postoperative phase. A dangling protocol is designed to gradually subject the free flap to increased venous pressure resulting from gravitational forces. Worldwide there are multiple variations of dangling protocols. However, there is no evidence available in the literature that supports the use of a dangling protocol. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that includes patients with a free flap lower leg reconstruction. The primary outcome is to assess whether a no-dangling protocol is not inferior to a dangling protocol, in terms of proportion of partial flap loss, 6 months after surgery. Secondary objectives are to identify differences in major and minor complications, length of stay, and costs, and to objectify blood gaseous changes during dangling. Furthermore, at 2 years we will assess difference in physical function, infection rates, and osseous union rates. DISCUSSION: The primary outcome of this study will give a more decisive answer to the question of whether a dangling protocol is necessary after a free flap reconstruction of the lower leg. The secondary outcomes of this study will provide a better insight into the physical functions, infection rates, and union rates in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO), NL63146.041.17. Registered on 11 July 2018. Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7545. Registered on 10 October 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3665-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67376582019-09-16 Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study Krijgh, David D. Teunis, Teun Schellekens, Pascal P. A. Mureau, Marc A. M. Luijsterburg, Antonius J. M. Tempelman, Tallechien M. T. van der Beek, Eva S. J. Maarse, Wiesje Coert, J. Henk Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Within the field of plastic surgery, free tissue transfer is common practice for knee and lower leg defects. Usually, after such free flap reconstruction, patients undergo a dangling protocol in the postoperative phase. A dangling protocol is designed to gradually subject the free flap to increased venous pressure resulting from gravitational forces. Worldwide there are multiple variations of dangling protocols. However, there is no evidence available in the literature that supports the use of a dangling protocol. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that includes patients with a free flap lower leg reconstruction. The primary outcome is to assess whether a no-dangling protocol is not inferior to a dangling protocol, in terms of proportion of partial flap loss, 6 months after surgery. Secondary objectives are to identify differences in major and minor complications, length of stay, and costs, and to objectify blood gaseous changes during dangling. Furthermore, at 2 years we will assess difference in physical function, infection rates, and osseous union rates. DISCUSSION: The primary outcome of this study will give a more decisive answer to the question of whether a dangling protocol is necessary after a free flap reconstruction of the lower leg. The secondary outcomes of this study will provide a better insight into the physical functions, infection rates, and union rates in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO), NL63146.041.17. Registered on 11 July 2018. Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7545. Registered on 10 October 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3665-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737658/ /pubmed/31511052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3665-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Krijgh, David D.
Teunis, Teun
Schellekens, Pascal P. A.
Mureau, Marc A. M.
Luijsterburg, Antonius J. M.
Tempelman, Tallechien M. T.
van der Beek, Eva S. J.
Maarse, Wiesje
Coert, J. Henk
Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
title Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
title_full Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
title_short Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
title_sort is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31511052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3665-0
work_keys_str_mv AT krijghdavidd isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT teunisteun isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT schellekenspascalpa isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT mureaumarcam isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT luijsterburgantoniusjm isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT tempelmantallechienmt isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT vanderbeekevasj isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT maarsewiesje isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT coertjhenk isdanglingofthelowerlegafterafreeflapreconstructionnecessarystudyprotocolforalargemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudy