Cargando…

Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare cardiometabolic indicators in singletons and multiples at age 7 and explore the birthweight mediation effect. METHODS: We studied 5431 singletons and 103 sets of multiples from Generation XXI birth cohort. Anthropometric measurements, body composition, and fasting blo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonseca, Maria João, Santos, Ana Cristina, Barros, Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1707-0
_version_ 1783450700542377984
author Fonseca, Maria João
Santos, Ana Cristina
Barros, Henrique
author_facet Fonseca, Maria João
Santos, Ana Cristina
Barros, Henrique
author_sort Fonseca, Maria João
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare cardiometabolic indicators in singletons and multiples at age 7 and explore the birthweight mediation effect. METHODS: We studied 5431 singletons and 103 sets of multiples from Generation XXI birth cohort. Anthropometric measurements, body composition, and fasting blood samples were obtained. Age- and sex-specific z-scores were calculated (additionally height-specific for blood pressure). Adjusted regression coefficients and respective 95% confidence intervals [β (95%CI)] were computed using path analysis. RESULTS: Multiples had lower weight [− 0.419 (− 0.616;-0.223)], height [− 0.404 (− 0.594;-0.213)], BMI [− 0.470 (− 0.705;-0.234)], fat mass index [− 0.359 (− 0.565;-0.152)], waist circumference [− 0.342 (− 0.537;-0.147)], and waist-to-height ratio [− 0.165 (− 0.326;-0.003)] z-scores. These results were explained by the indirect effect via birthweight, which was also negative and significant for all the aforementioned cardiometabolic indicators, while no direct effect was present. There were also significant indirect effects regarding fat-free mass index, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure, though the total effects were not significant, due to the balance between direct and indirect effects. The only significant direct effect was regarding diastolic blood pressure [− 0.165 (− 0.302;-0.028)]. CONCLUSIONS: At age 7, multiples presented better cardiometabolic indicators explained by lower weight at birth, except for the lower blood pressure which was independent of an effect via birthweight. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1707-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67376612019-09-16 Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children Fonseca, Maria João Santos, Ana Cristina Barros, Henrique BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare cardiometabolic indicators in singletons and multiples at age 7 and explore the birthweight mediation effect. METHODS: We studied 5431 singletons and 103 sets of multiples from Generation XXI birth cohort. Anthropometric measurements, body composition, and fasting blood samples were obtained. Age- and sex-specific z-scores were calculated (additionally height-specific for blood pressure). Adjusted regression coefficients and respective 95% confidence intervals [β (95%CI)] were computed using path analysis. RESULTS: Multiples had lower weight [− 0.419 (− 0.616;-0.223)], height [− 0.404 (− 0.594;-0.213)], BMI [− 0.470 (− 0.705;-0.234)], fat mass index [− 0.359 (− 0.565;-0.152)], waist circumference [− 0.342 (− 0.537;-0.147)], and waist-to-height ratio [− 0.165 (− 0.326;-0.003)] z-scores. These results were explained by the indirect effect via birthweight, which was also negative and significant for all the aforementioned cardiometabolic indicators, while no direct effect was present. There were also significant indirect effects regarding fat-free mass index, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure, though the total effects were not significant, due to the balance between direct and indirect effects. The only significant direct effect was regarding diastolic blood pressure [− 0.165 (− 0.302;-0.028)]. CONCLUSIONS: At age 7, multiples presented better cardiometabolic indicators explained by lower weight at birth, except for the lower blood pressure which was independent of an effect via birthweight. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1707-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737661/ /pubmed/31510947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1707-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fonseca, Maria João
Santos, Ana Cristina
Barros, Henrique
Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
title Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
title_full Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
title_fullStr Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
title_full_unstemmed Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
title_short Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
title_sort different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1707-0
work_keys_str_mv AT fonsecamariajoao differentlevelsofcardiometabolicindicatorsinmultiplevssingletonchildren
AT santosanacristina differentlevelsofcardiometabolicindicatorsinmultiplevssingletonchildren
AT barroshenrique differentlevelsofcardiometabolicindicatorsinmultiplevssingletonchildren