Cargando…

Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and arthroplasty. Our objective was to assess practice patterns for operative and non-operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. We also report on complicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dabija, Dominique I., Guan, Hongshu, Neviaser, Andrew, Jain, Nitin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2812-9
_version_ 1783450706788745216
author Dabija, Dominique I.
Guan, Hongshu
Neviaser, Andrew
Jain, Nitin B.
author_facet Dabija, Dominique I.
Guan, Hongshu
Neviaser, Andrew
Jain, Nitin B.
author_sort Dabija, Dominique I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and arthroplasty. Our objective was to assess practice patterns for operative and non-operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. We also report on complications, readmissions, in-hospital mortality, and need for surgery after initial treatment of proximal humeral fractures in California, Florida, and New York. METHODS: The State Inpatient Databases and State Emergency Department Databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, were used for the states of California (2005–2011), Florida (2005–2014), and New York (2008–2014). Data on patients with proximal humeral fractures was extracted. Patients underwent non-operative or operative (ORIF or arthroplasty) treatment at baseline and were followed for at least 4 years from the index presentation. If the patient needed subsequent surgery, time to event was calculated in days, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. RESULTS: At the index visit, 90.3% of patients with proximal humeral fractures had non-operative treatment, 6.7% had ORIF, and 3.0% had arthroplasty. 7.6% of patients initially treated non-operatively, 6.6% initially treated with ORIF, and 7.2% initially treated with arthroplasty needed surgery during follow-up. Device complications were the primary reason for readmission in 5.3% of ORIF patients and 6.7% of arthroplasty patients (p < 0.0001). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 9.8% for patients managed non-operatively, 8.8% for ORIF, and 10.0% for arthroplasty (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients with proximal humeral fractures underwent non-operative treatment. There was a relatively high all-cause in-hospital mortality irrespective of treatment. Given the recent debate on operative versus non-operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures, our study provides valuable information on the need for revision surgery after initial treatment. The differences in rates of revision surgery between patients treated non-operatively, with ORIF, and with arthroplasty were small in magnitude. At nine years of follow-up, ORIF had the lowest probability of needing follow-up surgery, and arthroplasty had the highest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67376882019-09-16 Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states Dabija, Dominique I. Guan, Hongshu Neviaser, Andrew Jain, Nitin B. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and arthroplasty. Our objective was to assess practice patterns for operative and non-operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. We also report on complications, readmissions, in-hospital mortality, and need for surgery after initial treatment of proximal humeral fractures in California, Florida, and New York. METHODS: The State Inpatient Databases and State Emergency Department Databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, were used for the states of California (2005–2011), Florida (2005–2014), and New York (2008–2014). Data on patients with proximal humeral fractures was extracted. Patients underwent non-operative or operative (ORIF or arthroplasty) treatment at baseline and were followed for at least 4 years from the index presentation. If the patient needed subsequent surgery, time to event was calculated in days, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. RESULTS: At the index visit, 90.3% of patients with proximal humeral fractures had non-operative treatment, 6.7% had ORIF, and 3.0% had arthroplasty. 7.6% of patients initially treated non-operatively, 6.6% initially treated with ORIF, and 7.2% initially treated with arthroplasty needed surgery during follow-up. Device complications were the primary reason for readmission in 5.3% of ORIF patients and 6.7% of arthroplasty patients (p < 0.0001). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 9.8% for patients managed non-operatively, 8.8% for ORIF, and 10.0% for arthroplasty (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients with proximal humeral fractures underwent non-operative treatment. There was a relatively high all-cause in-hospital mortality irrespective of treatment. Given the recent debate on operative versus non-operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures, our study provides valuable information on the need for revision surgery after initial treatment. The differences in rates of revision surgery between patients treated non-operatively, with ORIF, and with arthroplasty were small in magnitude. At nine years of follow-up, ORIF had the lowest probability of needing follow-up surgery, and arthroplasty had the highest. BioMed Central 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6737688/ /pubmed/31506075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2812-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dabija, Dominique I.
Guan, Hongshu
Neviaser, Andrew
Jain, Nitin B.
Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
title Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
title_full Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
title_fullStr Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
title_full_unstemmed Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
title_short Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
title_sort readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2812-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dabijadominiquei readmissionsrevisionsandmortalityaftertreatmentforproximalhumeralfracturesinthreelargestates
AT guanhongshu readmissionsrevisionsandmortalityaftertreatmentforproximalhumeralfracturesinthreelargestates
AT neviaserandrew readmissionsrevisionsandmortalityaftertreatmentforproximalhumeralfracturesinthreelargestates
AT jainnitinb readmissionsrevisionsandmortalityaftertreatmentforproximalhumeralfracturesinthreelargestates