Cargando…

Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention

BACKGROUND: Dietary preferences vary depending on cancer type. The purpose of this study was to report dietary intervention preferences and a study program evaluation from post-treatment head and neck cancer survivors participating in a dietary intervention. METHODS: Between January 2015 and August...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowder, Sylvia L., Douglas, Katherine G., Frugé, Andrew D., Carroll, William R., Spencer, Sharon A., Locher, Julie L., Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy, Rogers, Laura Q., Arthur, Anna E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-019-0479-6
_version_ 1783450711058546688
author Crowder, Sylvia L.
Douglas, Katherine G.
Frugé, Andrew D.
Carroll, William R.
Spencer, Sharon A.
Locher, Julie L.
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Rogers, Laura Q.
Arthur, Anna E.
author_facet Crowder, Sylvia L.
Douglas, Katherine G.
Frugé, Andrew D.
Carroll, William R.
Spencer, Sharon A.
Locher, Julie L.
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Rogers, Laura Q.
Arthur, Anna E.
author_sort Crowder, Sylvia L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dietary preferences vary depending on cancer type. The purpose of this study was to report dietary intervention preferences and a study program evaluation from post-treatment head and neck cancer survivors participating in a dietary intervention. METHODS: Between January 2015 and August 2016, 24 head and neck cancer survivors participated in a 12-week randomized clinical dietary intervention trial that promoted weekly consumption of 2.5 cups of cruciferous vegetables and 3.5 cups of green leafy vegetables. At study completion, survivors completed a preferences survey and a study program evaluation to probe interests and improvement aspects for planning future dietary intervention trials. Descriptive statistics (means and frequencies) were generated for multiple choice question responses. Responses to open-ended questions were recorded and grouped based on themes, and verified by quality assurance checks by a second study team member. RESULTS: Twenty-three survivors completed the preferences and evaluation surveys (response rate 96%). Overall, most participants reported a preference for one-on-one telephone counseling from a registered dietitian nutritionist before beginning treatment. Ninety-six percent of participants ranked the overall study program as “very good” to “excellent,” and all agreed the objectives of the study were clear, the study staff was helpful and easy to contact, and the registered dietitian nutritionist was knowledgeable. CONCLUSIONS: Future research and dietary intervention planning for head and neck cancer survivors should focus on strategies to promote one-on-one telephone or other distance-based counseling combined with face-to-face visits, according to survivor preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67377062019-09-16 Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention Crowder, Sylvia L. Douglas, Katherine G. Frugé, Andrew D. Carroll, William R. Spencer, Sharon A. Locher, Julie L. Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy Rogers, Laura Q. Arthur, Anna E. Nutr J Short Report BACKGROUND: Dietary preferences vary depending on cancer type. The purpose of this study was to report dietary intervention preferences and a study program evaluation from post-treatment head and neck cancer survivors participating in a dietary intervention. METHODS: Between January 2015 and August 2016, 24 head and neck cancer survivors participated in a 12-week randomized clinical dietary intervention trial that promoted weekly consumption of 2.5 cups of cruciferous vegetables and 3.5 cups of green leafy vegetables. At study completion, survivors completed a preferences survey and a study program evaluation to probe interests and improvement aspects for planning future dietary intervention trials. Descriptive statistics (means and frequencies) were generated for multiple choice question responses. Responses to open-ended questions were recorded and grouped based on themes, and verified by quality assurance checks by a second study team member. RESULTS: Twenty-three survivors completed the preferences and evaluation surveys (response rate 96%). Overall, most participants reported a preference for one-on-one telephone counseling from a registered dietitian nutritionist before beginning treatment. Ninety-six percent of participants ranked the overall study program as “very good” to “excellent,” and all agreed the objectives of the study were clear, the study staff was helpful and easy to contact, and the registered dietitian nutritionist was knowledgeable. CONCLUSIONS: Future research and dietary intervention planning for head and neck cancer survivors should focus on strategies to promote one-on-one telephone or other distance-based counseling combined with face-to-face visits, according to survivor preference. BioMed Central 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6737706/ /pubmed/31506077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-019-0479-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Crowder, Sylvia L.
Douglas, Katherine G.
Frugé, Andrew D.
Carroll, William R.
Spencer, Sharon A.
Locher, Julie L.
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Rogers, Laura Q.
Arthur, Anna E.
Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
title Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
title_full Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
title_fullStr Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
title_full_unstemmed Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
title_short Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
title_sort head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-019-0479-6
work_keys_str_mv AT crowdersylvial headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT douglaskatherineg headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT frugeandrewd headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT carrollwilliamr headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT spencersharona headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT locherjuliel headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT demarkwahnefriedwendy headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT rogerslauraq headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention
AT arthurannae headandneckcancersurvivorspreferencesforandevaluationsofaposttreatmentdietaryintervention