Cargando…
Pooled analysis of T2 Candida for rapid diagnosis of candidiasis
BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis examined the diagnostic accuracy of T2 Candida for candidiasis. METHODS: The literature databases, such as PubMed, Embase, DVIO, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and CNKI, were searched on T2 Candida detection. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles, comprising of 2717...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31510929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4419-z |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis examined the diagnostic accuracy of T2 Candida for candidiasis. METHODS: The literature databases, such as PubMed, Embase, DVIO, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and CNKI, were searched on T2 Candida detection. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles, comprising of 2717 research subjects, were included in the study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88–0.94) and 0.94 95% CI: 0.93–0.95), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio was 10.16 (95% CI: 2.75–37.50) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.02–0.35), respectively. The combined diagnostic odds ratio is 133.65 95% CI: 17.21–1037.73), and the AUC of SROC is 0.9702 [(SE = 0.0235), Q* = 0.9201(SE = 0.0381)]. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence supported that T2 Candida has high accuracy and sensitivity and is of major clinical significance in the diagnosis of Candida infection. |
---|