Cargando…

Digging deep into diabetes: achieving better glycemic control in diabetic patients in a resident-run clinic

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects over 30 million Americans with an estimated annual cost of $327 billion in 2017. Patients with diabetes, especially with financial and/or social hardships, pose challenges in achieving target hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values. Understanding patient-specific bar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawatmeh, Sara, Meier, Maggie, Leung, Erika, Haque, Ramza, Kaur, Harinderjeet, Asghar, Muhammad F., Talebian, Amirsoheil, Qaiyum, Osman, Shailly, Rajat, Al-Abboud, Omar, Patlolla, Keerthi, Aziz, Akm Towfique, Kawsar, Hameem I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1650594
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects over 30 million Americans with an estimated annual cost of $327 billion in 2017. Patients with diabetes, especially with financial and/or social hardships, pose challenges in achieving target hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values. Understanding patient-specific barriers offer opportunities to improve outcomes in patient care. Objective: We aimed to improve a patient’s glycemic control by reducing barriers to care. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact that a resident quality improvement effort had on providing high value diabetic care. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with HbA1c >9.0% in an underserved, resident-run clinic. Patients were surveyed on their knowledge of diabetes and reported obstacles to achieve diabetic control. We then implemented a 12 -month customized, patient-directed, multi-modal, multidisciplinary intervention. Results: Ninety-four patients with HbA1c >9.0% were identified, 65 surveyed, and 51 included in the intervention phase. After the intervention phase, re-evaluation of HbA1c in a paired sample comparison showed that the average HbA1c had decreased by 1.41% (11.28% vs. 9.87%, p < 0.01). Among the patients included in the intervention group, approximately 8% had their HbA1c reduced by ≥50% from their baseline, 23% had their HbA1c reduced by ≥25% from their baseline and 49% had their HbA1c reduced by ≥10% from their baseline. Conclusions: A strategically designed, a patient-centered customized intervention can have a positive impact on a patient’s diabetic control.