Cargando…

The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives

INTRODUCTION: Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dey, Paola, Brown, Jeremy, Sandars, John, Young, Yvonne, Ruggles, Ruth, Bracebridge, Samantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507267
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1900013
_version_ 1783450727027310592
author Dey, Paola
Brown, Jeremy
Sandars, John
Young, Yvonne
Ruggles, Ruth
Bracebridge, Samantha
author_facet Dey, Paola
Brown, Jeremy
Sandars, John
Young, Yvonne
Ruggles, Ruth
Bracebridge, Samantha
author_sort Dey, Paola
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology services, (ii) develop a network of highly skilled field epidemiologists with a shared sense of purpose working to common standards and (iii) raise the profile of field epidemiology through embedding it into everyday health protection practice. METHODS: The evaluation consisted of: (i) focus groups with training site staff, (ii) individual interviews with stakeholders and (iii) an online survey of FETP fellows and graduates. Findings were synthesised and triangulated across the three evaluation components to identify cross-cutting themes and subthemes. FINDINGS: Eight focus groups were undertaken with 38 staff, ten stakeholders were interviewed and 28 (76%) graduates and fellows responded to the survey. Three themes emerged: confidence, application and rigour. FETP was perceived to have contributed to the development, directly and indirectly, of a skilled workforce in field epidemiology, increasing stakeholders’ confidence in the service. Graduates applied their learning in practice, collaborating with a wide range of disciplines. Fellows and graduates demonstrated rigour by introducing innovations, supporting service improvements and helping supervisors maintain their skills and share good practice. CONCLUSION: The UK FETP appears to have met its three key objectives, and also had wider organisational impact. FETPs should systematically and prospectively collect information on how they have influenced changes to field epidemiology practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67378272019-09-27 The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives Dey, Paola Brown, Jeremy Sandars, John Young, Yvonne Ruggles, Ruth Bracebridge, Samantha Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology services, (ii) develop a network of highly skilled field epidemiologists with a shared sense of purpose working to common standards and (iii) raise the profile of field epidemiology through embedding it into everyday health protection practice. METHODS: The evaluation consisted of: (i) focus groups with training site staff, (ii) individual interviews with stakeholders and (iii) an online survey of FETP fellows and graduates. Findings were synthesised and triangulated across the three evaluation components to identify cross-cutting themes and subthemes. FINDINGS: Eight focus groups were undertaken with 38 staff, ten stakeholders were interviewed and 28 (76%) graduates and fellows responded to the survey. Three themes emerged: confidence, application and rigour. FETP was perceived to have contributed to the development, directly and indirectly, of a skilled workforce in field epidemiology, increasing stakeholders’ confidence in the service. Graduates applied their learning in practice, collaborating with a wide range of disciplines. Fellows and graduates demonstrated rigour by introducing innovations, supporting service improvements and helping supervisors maintain their skills and share good practice. CONCLUSION: The UK FETP appears to have met its three key objectives, and also had wider organisational impact. FETPs should systematically and prospectively collect information on how they have influenced changes to field epidemiology practice. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6737827/ /pubmed/31507267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1900013 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Dey, Paola
Brown, Jeremy
Sandars, John
Young, Yvonne
Ruggles, Ruth
Bracebridge, Samantha
The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives
title The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives
title_full The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives
title_fullStr The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives
title_full_unstemmed The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives
title_short The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives
title_sort united kingdom field epidemiology training programme: meeting programme objectives
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507267
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1900013
work_keys_str_mv AT deypaola theunitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT brownjeremy theunitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT sandarsjohn theunitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT youngyvonne theunitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT rugglesruth theunitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT bracebridgesamantha theunitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT deypaola unitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT brownjeremy unitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT sandarsjohn unitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT youngyvonne unitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT rugglesruth unitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives
AT bracebridgesamantha unitedkingdomfieldepidemiologytrainingprogrammemeetingprogrammeobjectives