Cargando…

Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Implant site development can be effective in minimizing postextraction alveolar ridge resorption in the esthetic region. Microsurgical approach has demonstrated substantial improvement in soft-tissue architecture. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Deepali, Mohan, Ranjana, Singh, Vikram Deep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543619
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_738_18
_version_ 1783450732480954368
author Jain, Deepali
Mohan, Ranjana
Singh, Vikram Deep
author_facet Jain, Deepali
Mohan, Ranjana
Singh, Vikram Deep
author_sort Jain, Deepali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implant site development can be effective in minimizing postextraction alveolar ridge resorption in the esthetic region. Microsurgical approach has demonstrated substantial improvement in soft-tissue architecture. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microsurgical technique with conventional one for implant site development utilizing biphasic hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute and collagen membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extraction sites were planned for implant placement and randomly divided into control (macrosurgical/conventional) and test (microsurgery) sites. Clinical measurements were recorded at four different points of extraction socket, i.e., mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual/palatal at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Postoperative neovascularization at control and test site was evaluated by ultrasound Doppler flowmetry at baseline, 10(th) day, and 1 month. Radiological assessment of bone density (Hounsfield units) was measured at control and test sites at baseline, 6 and 9 months by computed tomography. Data was subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant socket fill at all the four different sites was observed and found to be statistically significant at test as compared to control group with better tissue contour after 3, 6, and 9 months. Test group demonstrated better neovascularization (P < 0.05) with significantly higher bone density (P = 0.000) at different time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the augmentation of extraction sockets, not only improved the quality of bone in both the techniques but the utilization of microsurgical instruments and microsutures under magnification definitely enhanced the quality of soft tissues which is imperative for successful implant placement and its survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67378512019-09-20 Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial Jain, Deepali Mohan, Ranjana Singh, Vikram Deep J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Implant site development can be effective in minimizing postextraction alveolar ridge resorption in the esthetic region. Microsurgical approach has demonstrated substantial improvement in soft-tissue architecture. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microsurgical technique with conventional one for implant site development utilizing biphasic hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute and collagen membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extraction sites were planned for implant placement and randomly divided into control (macrosurgical/conventional) and test (microsurgery) sites. Clinical measurements were recorded at four different points of extraction socket, i.e., mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual/palatal at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Postoperative neovascularization at control and test site was evaluated by ultrasound Doppler flowmetry at baseline, 10(th) day, and 1 month. Radiological assessment of bone density (Hounsfield units) was measured at control and test sites at baseline, 6 and 9 months by computed tomography. Data was subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant socket fill at all the four different sites was observed and found to be statistically significant at test as compared to control group with better tissue contour after 3, 6, and 9 months. Test group demonstrated better neovascularization (P < 0.05) with significantly higher bone density (P = 0.000) at different time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the augmentation of extraction sockets, not only improved the quality of bone in both the techniques but the utilization of microsurgical instruments and microsutures under magnification definitely enhanced the quality of soft tissues which is imperative for successful implant placement and its survival. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6737851/ /pubmed/31543619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_738_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Deepali
Mohan, Ranjana
Singh, Vikram Deep
Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543619
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_738_18
work_keys_str_mv AT jaindeepali comparisonofmicrosurgicalandmacrosurgicaltechniqueusingbioactivesyntheticbonegraftandcollagenmembraneforanimplantsitedevelopmentarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT mohanranjana comparisonofmicrosurgicalandmacrosurgicaltechniqueusingbioactivesyntheticbonegraftandcollagenmembraneforanimplantsitedevelopmentarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT singhvikramdeep comparisonofmicrosurgicalandmacrosurgicaltechniqueusingbioactivesyntheticbonegraftandcollagenmembraneforanimplantsitedevelopmentarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial