Cargando…
Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Implant site development can be effective in minimizing postextraction alveolar ridge resorption in the esthetic region. Microsurgical approach has demonstrated substantial improvement in soft-tissue architecture. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_738_18 |
_version_ | 1783450732480954368 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Deepali Mohan, Ranjana Singh, Vikram Deep |
author_facet | Jain, Deepali Mohan, Ranjana Singh, Vikram Deep |
author_sort | Jain, Deepali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implant site development can be effective in minimizing postextraction alveolar ridge resorption in the esthetic region. Microsurgical approach has demonstrated substantial improvement in soft-tissue architecture. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microsurgical technique with conventional one for implant site development utilizing biphasic hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute and collagen membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extraction sites were planned for implant placement and randomly divided into control (macrosurgical/conventional) and test (microsurgery) sites. Clinical measurements were recorded at four different points of extraction socket, i.e., mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual/palatal at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Postoperative neovascularization at control and test site was evaluated by ultrasound Doppler flowmetry at baseline, 10(th) day, and 1 month. Radiological assessment of bone density (Hounsfield units) was measured at control and test sites at baseline, 6 and 9 months by computed tomography. Data was subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant socket fill at all the four different sites was observed and found to be statistically significant at test as compared to control group with better tissue contour after 3, 6, and 9 months. Test group demonstrated better neovascularization (P < 0.05) with significantly higher bone density (P = 0.000) at different time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the augmentation of extraction sockets, not only improved the quality of bone in both the techniques but the utilization of microsurgical instruments and microsutures under magnification definitely enhanced the quality of soft tissues which is imperative for successful implant placement and its survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6737851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67378512019-09-20 Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial Jain, Deepali Mohan, Ranjana Singh, Vikram Deep J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Implant site development can be effective in minimizing postextraction alveolar ridge resorption in the esthetic region. Microsurgical approach has demonstrated substantial improvement in soft-tissue architecture. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microsurgical technique with conventional one for implant site development utilizing biphasic hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute and collagen membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extraction sites were planned for implant placement and randomly divided into control (macrosurgical/conventional) and test (microsurgery) sites. Clinical measurements were recorded at four different points of extraction socket, i.e., mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual/palatal at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Postoperative neovascularization at control and test site was evaluated by ultrasound Doppler flowmetry at baseline, 10(th) day, and 1 month. Radiological assessment of bone density (Hounsfield units) was measured at control and test sites at baseline, 6 and 9 months by computed tomography. Data was subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant socket fill at all the four different sites was observed and found to be statistically significant at test as compared to control group with better tissue contour after 3, 6, and 9 months. Test group demonstrated better neovascularization (P < 0.05) with significantly higher bone density (P = 0.000) at different time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the augmentation of extraction sockets, not only improved the quality of bone in both the techniques but the utilization of microsurgical instruments and microsutures under magnification definitely enhanced the quality of soft tissues which is imperative for successful implant placement and its survival. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6737851/ /pubmed/31543619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_738_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jain, Deepali Mohan, Ranjana Singh, Vikram Deep Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
title | Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of microsurgical and macrosurgical technique using bioactive synthetic bone graft and collagen membrane for an implant site development: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_738_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaindeepali comparisonofmicrosurgicalandmacrosurgicaltechniqueusingbioactivesyntheticbonegraftandcollagenmembraneforanimplantsitedevelopmentarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT mohanranjana comparisonofmicrosurgicalandmacrosurgicaltechniqueusingbioactivesyntheticbonegraftandcollagenmembraneforanimplantsitedevelopmentarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT singhvikramdeep comparisonofmicrosurgicalandmacrosurgicaltechniqueusingbioactivesyntheticbonegraftandcollagenmembraneforanimplantsitedevelopmentarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |