Cargando…

Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how

Environmental changes aimed at encouraging walking or cycling may promote activity and improve health, but evidence suggests small or inconsistent effects in practice. Understanding how an intervention works might help explain the effects observed and provide guidance about generalisability. We ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panter, Jenna, Guell, Cornelia, Humphreys, David, Ogilvie, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102161
_version_ 1783450757578620928
author Panter, Jenna
Guell, Cornelia
Humphreys, David
Ogilvie, David
author_facet Panter, Jenna
Guell, Cornelia
Humphreys, David
Ogilvie, David
author_sort Panter, Jenna
collection PubMed
description Environmental changes aimed at encouraging walking or cycling may promote activity and improve health, but evidence suggests small or inconsistent effects in practice. Understanding how an intervention works might help explain the effects observed and provide guidance about generalisability. We therefore aimed to review the literature on the effects of this type of intervention and to understand how and why these may or may not be effective. We searched eight electronic databases for existing systematic reviews and mined these for evaluative studies of physical environmental changes and assessed changes in walking, cycling or physical activity. We then searched for related sources including quantitative or qualitative studies, policy documents or reports. We extracted information on the evidence for effects (‘estimation’), contexts and mechanisms (‘explanation’) and assessed credibility, and synthesised material narratively. We identified 13 evaluations of interventions specifically targeting walking and cycling and used 46 related sources. 70% (n = 9 evaluations) scored 3 or less on the credibility criteria for effectiveness. 6 reported significant positive effects, but higher quality evaluations were more likely to report positive effects. Only two studies provided rich evidence of mechanisms. We identified three common resources that interventions provide to promote walking and cycling: (i) improving accessibility and connectivity; (ii) improving traffic and personal safety; and (iii) improving the experience of walking and cycling. The most effective interventions appeared to target accessibility and safety in both supportive and unsupportive contexts. Although the evidence base was relatively limited, we were able to understand the role of context in the success of interventions. Researchers and policy makers should consider the context and mechanisms which might operate before evaluating and implementing interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6737987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67379872019-09-16 Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how Panter, Jenna Guell, Cornelia Humphreys, David Ogilvie, David Health Place Article Environmental changes aimed at encouraging walking or cycling may promote activity and improve health, but evidence suggests small or inconsistent effects in practice. Understanding how an intervention works might help explain the effects observed and provide guidance about generalisability. We therefore aimed to review the literature on the effects of this type of intervention and to understand how and why these may or may not be effective. We searched eight electronic databases for existing systematic reviews and mined these for evaluative studies of physical environmental changes and assessed changes in walking, cycling or physical activity. We then searched for related sources including quantitative or qualitative studies, policy documents or reports. We extracted information on the evidence for effects (‘estimation’), contexts and mechanisms (‘explanation’) and assessed credibility, and synthesised material narratively. We identified 13 evaluations of interventions specifically targeting walking and cycling and used 46 related sources. 70% (n = 9 evaluations) scored 3 or less on the credibility criteria for effectiveness. 6 reported significant positive effects, but higher quality evaluations were more likely to report positive effects. Only two studies provided rich evidence of mechanisms. We identified three common resources that interventions provide to promote walking and cycling: (i) improving accessibility and connectivity; (ii) improving traffic and personal safety; and (iii) improving the experience of walking and cycling. The most effective interventions appeared to target accessibility and safety in both supportive and unsupportive contexts. Although the evidence base was relatively limited, we were able to understand the role of context in the success of interventions. Researchers and policy makers should consider the context and mechanisms which might operate before evaluating and implementing interventions. Elsevier 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6737987/ /pubmed/31301599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102161 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panter, Jenna
Guell, Cornelia
Humphreys, David
Ogilvie, David
Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
title Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
title_full Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
title_fullStr Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
title_full_unstemmed Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
title_short Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
title_sort title: can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? a systematic review of what works and how
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102161
work_keys_str_mv AT panterjenna titlecanchangingthephysicalenvironmentpromotewalkingandcyclingasystematicreviewofwhatworksandhow
AT guellcornelia titlecanchangingthephysicalenvironmentpromotewalkingandcyclingasystematicreviewofwhatworksandhow
AT humphreysdavid titlecanchangingthephysicalenvironmentpromotewalkingandcyclingasystematicreviewofwhatworksandhow
AT ogilviedavid titlecanchangingthephysicalenvironmentpromotewalkingandcyclingasystematicreviewofwhatworksandhow