Cargando…
Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records
BACKGROUND: Early identification of cancer in primary care is important and challenging. This study examined the diagnostic utility of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and plasma viscosity) for cancer diagnosis in primary care. METHODS: Cohort study of 160,000...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0458-x |
_version_ | 1783450775754637312 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Jessica Salisbury, Chris Banks, Jonathan Whiting, Penny Hamilton, Willie |
author_facet | Watson, Jessica Salisbury, Chris Banks, Jonathan Whiting, Penny Hamilton, Willie |
author_sort | Watson, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early identification of cancer in primary care is important and challenging. This study examined the diagnostic utility of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and plasma viscosity) for cancer diagnosis in primary care. METHODS: Cohort study of 160,000 patients with inflammatory marker testing in 2014, plus 40,000 untested matched controls, using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), with Cancer Registry linkage. Primary outcome was one-year cancer incidence. RESULTS: Primary care patients with a raised inflammatory marker have a one-year cancer incidence of 3.53% (95% CI 3.37–3.70), compared to 1.50% (1.43–1.58) in those with normal inflammatory markers, and 0.97% (0.87–1.07) in untested controls. Cancer risk is greater with higher inflammatory marker levels, with older age and in men; risk rises further when a repeat test is abnormal but falls if it normalises. Men over 50 and women over 60 with raised inflammatory markers have a cancer risk which exceeds the 3% NICE threshold for urgent investigation. Sensitivities for cancer were 46.1% for CRP, 43.6% ESR and 49.7% for PV. CONCLUSION: Cancer should be considered in patients with raised inflammatory markers. However, inflammatory markers have a poor sensitivity for cancer and are therefore not useful as ‘rule-out’ test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6738065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67380652019-09-12 Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records Watson, Jessica Salisbury, Chris Banks, Jonathan Whiting, Penny Hamilton, Willie Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Early identification of cancer in primary care is important and challenging. This study examined the diagnostic utility of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and plasma viscosity) for cancer diagnosis in primary care. METHODS: Cohort study of 160,000 patients with inflammatory marker testing in 2014, plus 40,000 untested matched controls, using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), with Cancer Registry linkage. Primary outcome was one-year cancer incidence. RESULTS: Primary care patients with a raised inflammatory marker have a one-year cancer incidence of 3.53% (95% CI 3.37–3.70), compared to 1.50% (1.43–1.58) in those with normal inflammatory markers, and 0.97% (0.87–1.07) in untested controls. Cancer risk is greater with higher inflammatory marker levels, with older age and in men; risk rises further when a repeat test is abnormal but falls if it normalises. Men over 50 and women over 60 with raised inflammatory markers have a cancer risk which exceeds the 3% NICE threshold for urgent investigation. Sensitivities for cancer were 46.1% for CRP, 43.6% ESR and 49.7% for PV. CONCLUSION: Cancer should be considered in patients with raised inflammatory markers. However, inflammatory markers have a poor sensitivity for cancer and are therefore not useful as ‘rule-out’ test. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-24 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6738065/ /pubmed/31015558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0458-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Watson, Jessica Salisbury, Chris Banks, Jonathan Whiting, Penny Hamilton, Willie Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
title | Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
title_full | Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
title_fullStr | Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
title_short | Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
title_sort | predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0458-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonjessica predictivevalueofinflammatorymarkersforcancerdiagnosisinprimarycareaprospectivecohortstudyusingelectronichealthrecords AT salisburychris predictivevalueofinflammatorymarkersforcancerdiagnosisinprimarycareaprospectivecohortstudyusingelectronichealthrecords AT banksjonathan predictivevalueofinflammatorymarkersforcancerdiagnosisinprimarycareaprospectivecohortstudyusingelectronichealthrecords AT whitingpenny predictivevalueofinflammatorymarkersforcancerdiagnosisinprimarycareaprospectivecohortstudyusingelectronichealthrecords AT hamiltonwillie predictivevalueofinflammatorymarkersforcancerdiagnosisinprimarycareaprospectivecohortstudyusingelectronichealthrecords |