Cargando…

The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported up to 50% of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is HER2 positive, but the frequency of HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (IBC) is lower. The aim of this study is to characterise HER2 status in DCIS and assess its prognostic value. METHODS: HER2 status was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miligy, Islam M., Toss, Michael S., Gorringe, Kylie L., Lee, Andrew H. S., Ellis, Ian O., Green, Andrew R., Rakha, Emad A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0436-3
_version_ 1783450786287583232
author Miligy, Islam M.
Toss, Michael S.
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Lee, Andrew H. S.
Ellis, Ian O.
Green, Andrew R.
Rakha, Emad A.
author_facet Miligy, Islam M.
Toss, Michael S.
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Lee, Andrew H. S.
Ellis, Ian O.
Green, Andrew R.
Rakha, Emad A.
author_sort Miligy, Islam M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported up to 50% of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is HER2 positive, but the frequency of HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (IBC) is lower. The aim of this study is to characterise HER2 status in DCIS and assess its prognostic value. METHODS: HER2 status was evaluated in a large series of DCIS (n = 868), including pure DCIS and DCIS associated with IBC, prepared as tissue microarrays (TMAs). HER2 status was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH). RESULTS: In pure DCIS, HER2 protein was over-expressed in 9% of DCIS (3+), whereas 15% were HER2 equivocal (2+). Using CISH, the final HER2 status was positive in 20%. In mixed DCIS, HER2 amplification of the DCIS component was detected in 15% with amplification in the invasive component of only 12%. HER2-positive DCIS was associated with features of aggressiveness (p < 0.0001) and more frequent local recurrence (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, combined HER2+/Ki67+ profile was an independent predictor of local recurrence (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of HER2 positivity in DCIS is comparable to IBC- and HER2-positive DCIS is associated with features of poor prognosis. The majority of HER2 over-expression in DCIS is driven by gene amplification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67381102020-05-08 The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution Miligy, Islam M. Toss, Michael S. Gorringe, Kylie L. Lee, Andrew H. S. Ellis, Ian O. Green, Andrew R. Rakha, Emad A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported up to 50% of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is HER2 positive, but the frequency of HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (IBC) is lower. The aim of this study is to characterise HER2 status in DCIS and assess its prognostic value. METHODS: HER2 status was evaluated in a large series of DCIS (n = 868), including pure DCIS and DCIS associated with IBC, prepared as tissue microarrays (TMAs). HER2 status was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH). RESULTS: In pure DCIS, HER2 protein was over-expressed in 9% of DCIS (3+), whereas 15% were HER2 equivocal (2+). Using CISH, the final HER2 status was positive in 20%. In mixed DCIS, HER2 amplification of the DCIS component was detected in 15% with amplification in the invasive component of only 12%. HER2-positive DCIS was associated with features of aggressiveness (p < 0.0001) and more frequent local recurrence (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, combined HER2+/Ki67+ profile was an independent predictor of local recurrence (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of HER2 positivity in DCIS is comparable to IBC- and HER2-positive DCIS is associated with features of poor prognosis. The majority of HER2 over-expression in DCIS is driven by gene amplification. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-08 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6738110/ /pubmed/31065110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0436-3 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Miligy, Islam M.
Toss, Michael S.
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Lee, Andrew H. S.
Ellis, Ian O.
Green, Andrew R.
Rakha, Emad A.
The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
title The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
title_full The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
title_fullStr The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
title_full_unstemmed The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
title_short The clinical and biological significance of HER2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
title_sort clinical and biological significance of her2 over-expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: a large study from a single institution
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0436-3
work_keys_str_mv AT miligyislamm theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT tossmichaels theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT gorringekyliel theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT leeandrewhs theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT ellisiano theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT greenandrewr theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT rakhaemada theclinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT miligyislamm clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT tossmichaels clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT gorringekyliel clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT leeandrewhs clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT ellisiano clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT greenandrewr clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution
AT rakhaemada clinicalandbiologicalsignificanceofher2overexpressioninbreastductalcarcinomainsitualargestudyfromasingleinstitution