Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided interscalene block (ISB) is the reference technique for pain control after ambulatory upper limb surgery, but supraclavicular block (SCB) is an alternative. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of SCB vs. ISB in patients undergoing ambulatory ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabaton, Julien, Nové-Josserand, Laurent, Mercadal, Luc, Vaudelin, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009- 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001065
_version_ 1783450831277785088
author Cabaton, Julien
Nové-Josserand, Laurent
Mercadal, Luc
Vaudelin, Thierry
author_facet Cabaton, Julien
Nové-Josserand, Laurent
Mercadal, Luc
Vaudelin, Thierry
author_sort Cabaton, Julien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided interscalene block (ISB) is the reference technique for pain control after ambulatory upper limb surgery, but supraclavicular block (SCB) is an alternative. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of SCB vs. ISB in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), with the hypothesis of noninferiority of SCB analgesia compared with ISB. DESIGN: A randomised, single-blind, noninferiority study. SETTING: Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Paul Santy, Lyon, France. PATIENTS: Ambulatory ARCR patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated (1 : 1) to receive a single injection SCB or ISB, as well as general anaesthesia. All patients received a postoperative analgesic prescription for home use before leaving hospital (including fast-acting oral morphine sulphate). Patients completed a telephone questionnaire on days 1 and 2 postsurgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint was oral morphine consumption (mg) during the first 2 days postsurgery. If the difference between mean morphine consumption in the SCB vs. ISB group was less than 30 mg, noninferiority of SCB compared with ISB would be demonstrated. Secondary evaluation criteria included pain scores (numerical rating scale), duration of motor and sensory blockade, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: The per-protocol cohort included 103 patients (SCB = 52, ISB = 51) (57% men, median age 58 years). Mean morphine consumption in the 48 h postsurgery was 9.4 vs. 14.7 mg in the SCB and ISB groups, respectively (difference −5.3, P < 0.001). The upper limit of the 95% CI was less than 30 mg, demonstrating noninferiority of SCB compared with ISB. No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of pain scores or the duration of motor or sensory blockade. Overall, 98% of patients in the SCB group vs. 90% in the ISB group were satisfied with their treatment. CONCLUSION: SCB is as effective as ISB in terms of postoperative analgesia based on oral morphine consumption in patients undergoing ambulatory ARCR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2016-A00747-47.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009-
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67385432019-10-02 Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study Cabaton, Julien Nové-Josserand, Laurent Mercadal, Luc Vaudelin, Thierry Eur J Anaesthesiol Loco-Regional Anaesthesia BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided interscalene block (ISB) is the reference technique for pain control after ambulatory upper limb surgery, but supraclavicular block (SCB) is an alternative. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of SCB vs. ISB in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), with the hypothesis of noninferiority of SCB analgesia compared with ISB. DESIGN: A randomised, single-blind, noninferiority study. SETTING: Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Paul Santy, Lyon, France. PATIENTS: Ambulatory ARCR patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated (1 : 1) to receive a single injection SCB or ISB, as well as general anaesthesia. All patients received a postoperative analgesic prescription for home use before leaving hospital (including fast-acting oral morphine sulphate). Patients completed a telephone questionnaire on days 1 and 2 postsurgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint was oral morphine consumption (mg) during the first 2 days postsurgery. If the difference between mean morphine consumption in the SCB vs. ISB group was less than 30 mg, noninferiority of SCB compared with ISB would be demonstrated. Secondary evaluation criteria included pain scores (numerical rating scale), duration of motor and sensory blockade, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: The per-protocol cohort included 103 patients (SCB = 52, ISB = 51) (57% men, median age 58 years). Mean morphine consumption in the 48 h postsurgery was 9.4 vs. 14.7 mg in the SCB and ISB groups, respectively (difference −5.3, P < 0.001). The upper limit of the 95% CI was less than 30 mg, demonstrating noninferiority of SCB compared with ISB. No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of pain scores or the duration of motor or sensory blockade. Overall, 98% of patients in the SCB group vs. 90% in the ISB group were satisfied with their treatment. CONCLUSION: SCB is as effective as ISB in terms of postoperative analgesia based on oral morphine consumption in patients undergoing ambulatory ARCR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2016-A00747-47. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009- 2019-10 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6738543/ /pubmed/31361631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001065 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Loco-Regional Anaesthesia
Cabaton, Julien
Nové-Josserand, Laurent
Mercadal, Luc
Vaudelin, Thierry
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study
title Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study
title_full Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study
title_short Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomised noninferiority study
title_sort analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomised noninferiority study
topic Loco-Regional Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001065
work_keys_str_mv AT cabatonjulien analgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedinterscaleneblockvssupraclavicularblockforambulatoryarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairarandomisednoninferioritystudy
AT novejosserandlaurent analgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedinterscaleneblockvssupraclavicularblockforambulatoryarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairarandomisednoninferioritystudy
AT mercadalluc analgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedinterscaleneblockvssupraclavicularblockforambulatoryarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairarandomisednoninferioritystudy
AT vaudelinthierry analgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedinterscaleneblockvssupraclavicularblockforambulatoryarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairarandomisednoninferioritystudy