Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with limited effective treatment options. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline in patients with IBS-D who reported inadequate symptom control with prior loperamide. METHODS: Three hundred forty-si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenner, Darren M., Sayuk, Gregory S., Gutman, Catherine R., Jo, Esther, Elmes, Steven J. R., Liu, Louis W. C., Cash, Brooks D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356229
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000327
_version_ 1783450844031614976
author Brenner, Darren M.
Sayuk, Gregory S.
Gutman, Catherine R.
Jo, Esther
Elmes, Steven J. R.
Liu, Louis W. C.
Cash, Brooks D.
author_facet Brenner, Darren M.
Sayuk, Gregory S.
Gutman, Catherine R.
Jo, Esther
Elmes, Steven J. R.
Liu, Louis W. C.
Cash, Brooks D.
author_sort Brenner, Darren M.
collection PubMed
description Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with limited effective treatment options. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline in patients with IBS-D who reported inadequate symptom control with prior loperamide. METHODS: Three hundred forty-six adults with IBS-D (Rome III criteria) were randomly assigned to placebo or eluxadoline 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Patients recorded daily IBS-D symptoms, including worst abdominal pain (WAP) and stool consistency (through Bristol Stool Scale). The primary endpoint was proportion of composite responders, defined as patients who met daily composite response criteria (≥40% WAP improvement and <5 Bristol Stool Scale score) for at least 50% of treatment days, and recorded ≥60 days of diary entries over the 12-week period. RESULTS: Over 12 weeks, a significantly greater proportion of eluxadoline patients achieved the primary composite responder endpoint compared to placebo (22.7% vs 10.3%, P = 0.002), and component endpoints of improvements in stool consistency (27.9% vs 16.7%, P = 0.01) and WAP (43.6% vs 31.0%, P = 0.02). Additionally, a greater proportion of eluxadoline patients met the composite responder endpoint assessed at monthly intervals compared to placebo (weeks 1–4: 14.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03; weeks 5–8: 26.7% vs 14.9%, P = 0.006; weeks 9–12: 30.8% vs 16.7%, P = 0.002). Rates of adverse events were comparable in both groups (37.4% vs 35.3%); no treatment-related serious adverse event, cases of sphincter of Oddi spasm, or pancreatitis were reported. DISCUSSION: Eluxadoline appears safe and effective for treating IBS-D symptoms in patients with an intact gallbladder reporting inadequate relief with prior loperamide use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67386252019-10-02 Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study Brenner, Darren M. Sayuk, Gregory S. Gutman, Catherine R. Jo, Esther Elmes, Steven J. R. Liu, Louis W. C. Cash, Brooks D. Am J Gastroenterol Article Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with limited effective treatment options. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline in patients with IBS-D who reported inadequate symptom control with prior loperamide. METHODS: Three hundred forty-six adults with IBS-D (Rome III criteria) were randomly assigned to placebo or eluxadoline 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Patients recorded daily IBS-D symptoms, including worst abdominal pain (WAP) and stool consistency (through Bristol Stool Scale). The primary endpoint was proportion of composite responders, defined as patients who met daily composite response criteria (≥40% WAP improvement and <5 Bristol Stool Scale score) for at least 50% of treatment days, and recorded ≥60 days of diary entries over the 12-week period. RESULTS: Over 12 weeks, a significantly greater proportion of eluxadoline patients achieved the primary composite responder endpoint compared to placebo (22.7% vs 10.3%, P = 0.002), and component endpoints of improvements in stool consistency (27.9% vs 16.7%, P = 0.01) and WAP (43.6% vs 31.0%, P = 0.02). Additionally, a greater proportion of eluxadoline patients met the composite responder endpoint assessed at monthly intervals compared to placebo (weeks 1–4: 14.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03; weeks 5–8: 26.7% vs 14.9%, P = 0.006; weeks 9–12: 30.8% vs 16.7%, P = 0.002). Rates of adverse events were comparable in both groups (37.4% vs 35.3%); no treatment-related serious adverse event, cases of sphincter of Oddi spasm, or pancreatitis were reported. DISCUSSION: Eluxadoline appears safe and effective for treating IBS-D symptoms in patients with an intact gallbladder reporting inadequate relief with prior loperamide use. Wolters Kluwer 2019-07-26 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6738625/ /pubmed/31356229 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000327 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://crealrvecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Brenner, Darren M.
Sayuk, Gregory S.
Gutman, Catherine R.
Jo, Esther
Elmes, Steven J. R.
Liu, Louis W. C.
Cash, Brooks D.
Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study
title Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of eluxadoline in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea who report inadequate symptom control with loperamide: relief phase 4 study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356229
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000327
work_keys_str_mv AT brennerdarrenm efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study
AT sayukgregorys efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study
AT gutmancatheriner efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study
AT joesther efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study
AT elmesstevenjr efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study
AT liulouiswc efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study
AT cashbrooksd efficacyandsafetyofeluxadolineinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndromewithdiarrheawhoreportinadequatesymptomcontrolwithloperamidereliefphase4study