Cargando…

Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a patient safety culture (PSC) scale for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) institutions in China. METHODS: A theoretical framework of PSC for MCH institutions was proposed through in-depth interviews with MCH workers and patients and Delphi expert consultatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yuanyuan, Han, Hui, Qiu, Liqian, Liu, Chaojie, Wang, Yan, Liu, Weiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025607
_version_ 1783450858225139712
author Wang, Yuanyuan
Han, Hui
Qiu, Liqian
Liu, Chaojie
Wang, Yan
Liu, Weiwei
author_facet Wang, Yuanyuan
Han, Hui
Qiu, Liqian
Liu, Chaojie
Wang, Yan
Liu, Weiwei
author_sort Wang, Yuanyuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a patient safety culture (PSC) scale for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) institutions in China. METHODS: A theoretical framework of PSC for MCH institutions was proposed through in-depth interviews with MCH workers and patients and Delphi expert consultations. The reliability and validity of the PSC scale were tested in a cross-sectional survey of 1256 MCH workers from 14 MCH institutions in Zhejiang province of China. The study sample was randomly split into half for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, respectively. Test–retest reliability was assessed through a repeated survey of 63 voluntary participants 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis extracted 10 components: patient engagement in patient safety (six items), managerial response to patient safety risks (four items), perceived management support (five items), staff empowerment (four items), staffing and workloads (four items), reporting of adverse events (three items), defensive medical practice (three items), work commitment (three items), training (two items) and transfer and handoff (three items). A good model fit was found in the confirmatory factor analysis: χ(2)/df=1.822, standardised root mean residual=0.048, root mean square error of approximation=0.038, comparative fit index=0.921, Tucker-Lewis index=0.907. The PSC scale had a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.89 (0.59–0.90 for dimensional scales) and a test–retest reliability of 0.81 (0.63–0.87 for dimensional reliability), respectively. The intracluster correlation coefficients confirmed a hierarchical nature of the data: individual health workers nested within MCH institutions. CONCLUSION: The PSC scale for MCH institutions has acceptable reliability and validity. Further studies are needed to establish benchmarking in a national representative sample through a multilevel modelling approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67386932019-09-25 Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study Wang, Yuanyuan Han, Hui Qiu, Liqian Liu, Chaojie Wang, Yan Liu, Weiwei BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a patient safety culture (PSC) scale for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) institutions in China. METHODS: A theoretical framework of PSC for MCH institutions was proposed through in-depth interviews with MCH workers and patients and Delphi expert consultations. The reliability and validity of the PSC scale were tested in a cross-sectional survey of 1256 MCH workers from 14 MCH institutions in Zhejiang province of China. The study sample was randomly split into half for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, respectively. Test–retest reliability was assessed through a repeated survey of 63 voluntary participants 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis extracted 10 components: patient engagement in patient safety (six items), managerial response to patient safety risks (four items), perceived management support (five items), staff empowerment (four items), staffing and workloads (four items), reporting of adverse events (three items), defensive medical practice (three items), work commitment (three items), training (two items) and transfer and handoff (three items). A good model fit was found in the confirmatory factor analysis: χ(2)/df=1.822, standardised root mean residual=0.048, root mean square error of approximation=0.038, comparative fit index=0.921, Tucker-Lewis index=0.907. The PSC scale had a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.89 (0.59–0.90 for dimensional scales) and a test–retest reliability of 0.81 (0.63–0.87 for dimensional reliability), respectively. The intracluster correlation coefficients confirmed a hierarchical nature of the data: individual health workers nested within MCH institutions. CONCLUSION: The PSC scale for MCH institutions has acceptable reliability and validity. Further studies are needed to establish benchmarking in a national representative sample through a multilevel modelling approach. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6738693/ /pubmed/31501095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025607 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Wang, Yuanyuan
Han, Hui
Qiu, Liqian
Liu, Chaojie
Wang, Yan
Liu, Weiwei
Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study
title Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study
title_full Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study
title_fullStr Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study
title_short Development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in China: a cross-sectional validation study
title_sort development of a patient safety culture scale for maternal and child health institutions in china: a cross-sectional validation study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025607
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyuanyuan developmentofapatientsafetyculturescaleformaternalandchildhealthinstitutionsinchinaacrosssectionalvalidationstudy
AT hanhui developmentofapatientsafetyculturescaleformaternalandchildhealthinstitutionsinchinaacrosssectionalvalidationstudy
AT qiuliqian developmentofapatientsafetyculturescaleformaternalandchildhealthinstitutionsinchinaacrosssectionalvalidationstudy
AT liuchaojie developmentofapatientsafetyculturescaleformaternalandchildhealthinstitutionsinchinaacrosssectionalvalidationstudy
AT wangyan developmentofapatientsafetyculturescaleformaternalandchildhealthinstitutionsinchinaacrosssectionalvalidationstudy
AT liuweiwei developmentofapatientsafetyculturescaleformaternalandchildhealthinstitutionsinchinaacrosssectionalvalidationstudy