Cargando…

The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Govaert, GAM, Hobbelink, MGG, Reininga, IHF, Bosch, P, Kwee, TC, de Jong, PA, Jutte, PC, Vogely, HC, Dierckx, RAJO, Leenen, LPH, Glaudemans, AWJM, IJpma, FFA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027772
_version_ 1783450860155568128
author Govaert, GAM
Hobbelink, MGG
Reininga, IHF
Bosch, P
Kwee, TC
de Jong, PA
Jutte, PC
Vogely, HC
Dierckx, RAJO
Leenen, LPH
Glaudemans, AWJM
IJpma, FFA
author_facet Govaert, GAM
Hobbelink, MGG
Reininga, IHF
Bosch, P
Kwee, TC
de Jong, PA
Jutte, PC
Vogely, HC
Dierckx, RAJO
Leenen, LPH
Glaudemans, AWJM
IJpma, FFA
author_sort Govaert, GAM
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic performances of white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected FRI and (2) establishing the most accurate imaging strategy for diagnosing FRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a non-randomised, partially blinded, prospective cohort study involving two level 1 trauma centres in The Netherlands. All adult patients who require advanced medical imaging for suspected FRI are eligible for inclusion. Patients will undergo all three investigational imaging procedures (WBC scintigraphy, FDG-PET and MRI) within a time frame of 14 days after inclusion. The reference standard will be the result of at least five intraoperative sampled microbiology cultures, or, in case of no surgery, the clinical presence or absence of infection at 1 year follow-up. Initially, the results of all three imaging modalities will be available to the treating team as per local protocol. At a later time point, all scans will be centrally reassessed by nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists who are blinded for the identity of the patients and their clinical outcome. The discriminative ability of the imaging modalities will be quantified by several measures of diagnostic accuracy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board has been obtained prior to the start of this study. The results of this trial will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The IFI trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7490).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67387052019-09-25 The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. Govaert, GAM Hobbelink, MGG Reininga, IHF Bosch, P Kwee, TC de Jong, PA Jutte, PC Vogely, HC Dierckx, RAJO Leenen, LPH Glaudemans, AWJM IJpma, FFA BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic performances of white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected FRI and (2) establishing the most accurate imaging strategy for diagnosing FRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a non-randomised, partially blinded, prospective cohort study involving two level 1 trauma centres in The Netherlands. All adult patients who require advanced medical imaging for suspected FRI are eligible for inclusion. Patients will undergo all three investigational imaging procedures (WBC scintigraphy, FDG-PET and MRI) within a time frame of 14 days after inclusion. The reference standard will be the result of at least five intraoperative sampled microbiology cultures, or, in case of no surgery, the clinical presence or absence of infection at 1 year follow-up. Initially, the results of all three imaging modalities will be available to the treating team as per local protocol. At a later time point, all scans will be centrally reassessed by nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists who are blinded for the identity of the patients and their clinical outcome. The discriminative ability of the imaging modalities will be quantified by several measures of diagnostic accuracy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board has been obtained prior to the start of this study. The results of this trial will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The IFI trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7490). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6738705/ /pubmed/31501101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027772 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Govaert, GAM
Hobbelink, MGG
Reininga, IHF
Bosch, P
Kwee, TC
de Jong, PA
Jutte, PC
Vogely, HC
Dierckx, RAJO
Leenen, LPH
Glaudemans, AWJM
IJpma, FFA
The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
title The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
title_full The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
title_fullStr The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
title_short The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
title_sort accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in patients with a suspected fracture-related infection (ifi) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027772
work_keys_str_mv AT govaertgam theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT hobbelinkmgg theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT reiningaihf theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT boschp theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT kweetc theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT dejongpa theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT juttepc theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT vogelyhc theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT dierckxrajo theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT leenenlph theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT glaudemansawjm theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT ijpmaffa theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT govaertgam accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT hobbelinkmgg accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT reiningaihf accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT boschp accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT kweetc accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT dejongpa accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT juttepc accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT vogelyhc accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT dierckxrajo accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT leenenlph accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT glaudemansawjm accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT ijpmaffa accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy