Cargando…
The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.
INTRODUCTION: The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027772 |
_version_ | 1783450860155568128 |
---|---|
author | Govaert, GAM Hobbelink, MGG Reininga, IHF Bosch, P Kwee, TC de Jong, PA Jutte, PC Vogely, HC Dierckx, RAJO Leenen, LPH Glaudemans, AWJM IJpma, FFA |
author_facet | Govaert, GAM Hobbelink, MGG Reininga, IHF Bosch, P Kwee, TC de Jong, PA Jutte, PC Vogely, HC Dierckx, RAJO Leenen, LPH Glaudemans, AWJM IJpma, FFA |
author_sort | Govaert, GAM |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic performances of white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected FRI and (2) establishing the most accurate imaging strategy for diagnosing FRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a non-randomised, partially blinded, prospective cohort study involving two level 1 trauma centres in The Netherlands. All adult patients who require advanced medical imaging for suspected FRI are eligible for inclusion. Patients will undergo all three investigational imaging procedures (WBC scintigraphy, FDG-PET and MRI) within a time frame of 14 days after inclusion. The reference standard will be the result of at least five intraoperative sampled microbiology cultures, or, in case of no surgery, the clinical presence or absence of infection at 1 year follow-up. Initially, the results of all three imaging modalities will be available to the treating team as per local protocol. At a later time point, all scans will be centrally reassessed by nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists who are blinded for the identity of the patients and their clinical outcome. The discriminative ability of the imaging modalities will be quantified by several measures of diagnostic accuracy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board has been obtained prior to the start of this study. The results of this trial will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The IFI trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7490). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6738705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67387052019-09-25 The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. Govaert, GAM Hobbelink, MGG Reininga, IHF Bosch, P Kwee, TC de Jong, PA Jutte, PC Vogely, HC Dierckx, RAJO Leenen, LPH Glaudemans, AWJM IJpma, FFA BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: The optimal diagnostic imaging strategy for fracture-related infection (FRI) remains to be established. In this prospective study, the three commonly used advanced imaging techniques for diagnosing FRI will be compared. Primary endpoints are (1) determining the overall diagnostic performances of white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected FRI and (2) establishing the most accurate imaging strategy for diagnosing FRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a non-randomised, partially blinded, prospective cohort study involving two level 1 trauma centres in The Netherlands. All adult patients who require advanced medical imaging for suspected FRI are eligible for inclusion. Patients will undergo all three investigational imaging procedures (WBC scintigraphy, FDG-PET and MRI) within a time frame of 14 days after inclusion. The reference standard will be the result of at least five intraoperative sampled microbiology cultures, or, in case of no surgery, the clinical presence or absence of infection at 1 year follow-up. Initially, the results of all three imaging modalities will be available to the treating team as per local protocol. At a later time point, all scans will be centrally reassessed by nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists who are blinded for the identity of the patients and their clinical outcome. The discriminative ability of the imaging modalities will be quantified by several measures of diagnostic accuracy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board has been obtained prior to the start of this study. The results of this trial will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The IFI trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7490). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6738705/ /pubmed/31501101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027772 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Govaert, GAM Hobbelink, MGG Reininga, IHF Bosch, P Kwee, TC de Jong, PA Jutte, PC Vogely, HC Dierckx, RAJO Leenen, LPH Glaudemans, AWJM IJpma, FFA The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
title | The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
title_full | The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
title_short | The accuracy of diagnostic Imaging techniques in patients with a suspected Fracture-related Infection (IFI) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
title_sort | accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in patients with a suspected fracture-related infection (ifi) trial: study protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study. |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT govaertgam theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT hobbelinkmgg theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT reiningaihf theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT boschp theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT kweetc theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT dejongpa theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT juttepc theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT vogelyhc theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT dierckxrajo theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT leenenlph theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT glaudemansawjm theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT ijpmaffa theaccuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT govaertgam accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT hobbelinkmgg accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT reiningaihf accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT boschp accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT kweetc accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT dejongpa accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT juttepc accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT vogelyhc accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT dierckxrajo accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT leenenlph accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT glaudemansawjm accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT ijpmaffa accuracyofdiagnosticimagingtechniquesinpatientswithasuspectedfracturerelatedinfectionifitrialstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy |