Cargando…

Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach

OBJECTIVE: Based on two scoping reviews and two environmental scans, this study aimed at reaching consensus on the most suitable sensory screening tools for use by nurses working in long-term care homes, for the purpose of developing and validating a toolkit. SETTING: A mixed-methods consensus study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittich, Walter, Jarry, Jonathan, Höbler, Fiona, McGilton, Katherine S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027803
_version_ 1783450860862308352
author Wittich, Walter
Jarry, Jonathan
Höbler, Fiona
McGilton, Katherine S
author_facet Wittich, Walter
Jarry, Jonathan
Höbler, Fiona
McGilton, Katherine S
author_sort Wittich, Walter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Based on two scoping reviews and two environmental scans, this study aimed at reaching consensus on the most suitable sensory screening tools for use by nurses working in long-term care homes, for the purpose of developing and validating a toolkit. SETTING: A mixed-methods consensus study was conducted through two rounds of virtual electronic suitability rankings, followed by one online discussion group to resolve remaining disagreements. PARTICIPANTS: A 12-member convenience panel of specialists from three countries with expertise in sensory and cognitive ageing provided the ranking data, of whom four participated in the online discussion. OUTCOME MEASURES: As part of a larger mixed-methods project, the consensus was used to rank 22 vision and 20 hearing screening tests for suitability, based on 10 categories from the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. Panellists were asked to score each test by category, and their responses were converted to z-scores, pooled and ranked. Outliers in assessment distribution were then returned to the individual team members to adjust scoring towards consensus. RESULTS: In order of ranking, the top 4 vision screening tests were hand motion, counting fingers, confrontation visual fields and the HOT-V chart, whereas the top 4 hearing screening tests were the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly, the Whisper Test, the Measure of Severity of Hearing Loss and the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The final selection of vision screening tests relied on observable visual behaviours, such as visibility of tasks within the central or peripheral visual field, whereas three of the four hearing tests relied on subjective report. Next, feasibility will be tested by nurses using these tools in a long-term care setting with persons with various levels of cognitive impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67387122019-09-25 Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach Wittich, Walter Jarry, Jonathan Höbler, Fiona McGilton, Katherine S BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: Based on two scoping reviews and two environmental scans, this study aimed at reaching consensus on the most suitable sensory screening tools for use by nurses working in long-term care homes, for the purpose of developing and validating a toolkit. SETTING: A mixed-methods consensus study was conducted through two rounds of virtual electronic suitability rankings, followed by one online discussion group to resolve remaining disagreements. PARTICIPANTS: A 12-member convenience panel of specialists from three countries with expertise in sensory and cognitive ageing provided the ranking data, of whom four participated in the online discussion. OUTCOME MEASURES: As part of a larger mixed-methods project, the consensus was used to rank 22 vision and 20 hearing screening tests for suitability, based on 10 categories from the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. Panellists were asked to score each test by category, and their responses were converted to z-scores, pooled and ranked. Outliers in assessment distribution were then returned to the individual team members to adjust scoring towards consensus. RESULTS: In order of ranking, the top 4 vision screening tests were hand motion, counting fingers, confrontation visual fields and the HOT-V chart, whereas the top 4 hearing screening tests were the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly, the Whisper Test, the Measure of Severity of Hearing Loss and the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The final selection of vision screening tests relied on observable visual behaviours, such as visibility of tasks within the central or peripheral visual field, whereas three of the four hearing tests relied on subjective report. Next, feasibility will be tested by nurses using these tools in a long-term care setting with persons with various levels of cognitive impairment. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6738712/ /pubmed/31501102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027803 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Nursing
Wittich, Walter
Jarry, Jonathan
Höbler, Fiona
McGilton, Katherine S
Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
title Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
title_full Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
title_fullStr Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
title_full_unstemmed Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
title_short Agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
title_sort agreement on the use of sensory screening techniques by nurses for older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care: a mixed-methods consensus approach
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027803
work_keys_str_mv AT wittichwalter agreementontheuseofsensoryscreeningtechniquesbynursesforolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentinlongtermcareamixedmethodsconsensusapproach
AT jarryjonathan agreementontheuseofsensoryscreeningtechniquesbynursesforolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentinlongtermcareamixedmethodsconsensusapproach
AT hoblerfiona agreementontheuseofsensoryscreeningtechniquesbynursesforolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentinlongtermcareamixedmethodsconsensusapproach
AT mcgiltonkatherines agreementontheuseofsensoryscreeningtechniquesbynursesforolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentinlongtermcareamixedmethodsconsensusapproach