Cargando…

Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is based on hands-on training in the operating room, which is time consuming and therefore limits its experience among anesthesiologists. Medical simulations have been successfully used for training of invasive procedures in many areas....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Ulrike, Zapletal, Bernhard, Base, Eva, Hambrusch, Michael, Ristl, Robin, Mora, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017072
_version_ 1783450873805930496
author Weber, Ulrike
Zapletal, Bernhard
Base, Eva
Hambrusch, Michael
Ristl, Robin
Mora, Bruno
author_facet Weber, Ulrike
Zapletal, Bernhard
Base, Eva
Hambrusch, Michael
Ristl, Robin
Mora, Bruno
author_sort Weber, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is based on hands-on training in the operating room, which is time consuming and therefore limits its experience among anesthesiologists. Medical simulations have been successfully used for training of invasive procedures in many areas. This paper compares the difference in effectiveness of teaching the 11 basic TEE views using either e-learning, simulation based training or hands-on training in the operating room in 3 groups of residents. METHODS: We included 51 anesthesia and intensive care residents of all training levels but no prior training in echocardiography in this prospective randomized single-center study. Residents received a tutorial about theoretical knowledge followed by 2 practical study sessions either by e-learning using an online simulator (www.pie.med.utoronto.ca/TEE), with the simulation mannequin (CAE Vimedix Simulator) or in the operating room. Both, a theoretical multiple choice test (0–50 points) and a practical exam test (0–110 points) on the simulation mannequin had to be completed. The primary endpoint was the post-training scores in the practical and theoretical exams after all training sessions. RESULTS: Residents received significantly higher test scores in both practical and theoretical examinations after training with the simulation mannequin (108.41 ± 2.09, 40.6 ± 5.23, n = 17) compared with e-learning (106.88 ± 4.53, 36 ± 4.76, n = 17) or hands-on training (106.82 ± 2.01, 34.94 ± 4.72, n = 17). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation based TEE training provides more effective training than other teaching methods. It is therefore especially suitable for the initial stages of TEE training to acquire psychomotor skills and knowledge of echo-anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6738965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67389652019-10-02 Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial Weber, Ulrike Zapletal, Bernhard Base, Eva Hambrusch, Michael Ristl, Robin Mora, Bruno Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is based on hands-on training in the operating room, which is time consuming and therefore limits its experience among anesthesiologists. Medical simulations have been successfully used for training of invasive procedures in many areas. This paper compares the difference in effectiveness of teaching the 11 basic TEE views using either e-learning, simulation based training or hands-on training in the operating room in 3 groups of residents. METHODS: We included 51 anesthesia and intensive care residents of all training levels but no prior training in echocardiography in this prospective randomized single-center study. Residents received a tutorial about theoretical knowledge followed by 2 practical study sessions either by e-learning using an online simulator (www.pie.med.utoronto.ca/TEE), with the simulation mannequin (CAE Vimedix Simulator) or in the operating room. Both, a theoretical multiple choice test (0–50 points) and a practical exam test (0–110 points) on the simulation mannequin had to be completed. The primary endpoint was the post-training scores in the practical and theoretical exams after all training sessions. RESULTS: Residents received significantly higher test scores in both practical and theoretical examinations after training with the simulation mannequin (108.41 ± 2.09, 40.6 ± 5.23, n = 17) compared with e-learning (106.88 ± 4.53, 36 ± 4.76, n = 17) or hands-on training (106.82 ± 2.01, 34.94 ± 4.72, n = 17). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation based TEE training provides more effective training than other teaching methods. It is therefore especially suitable for the initial stages of TEE training to acquire psychomotor skills and knowledge of echo-anatomy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6738965/ /pubmed/31490407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017072 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Weber, Ulrike
Zapletal, Bernhard
Base, Eva
Hambrusch, Michael
Ristl, Robin
Mora, Bruno
Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
title Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
title_full Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
title_short Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: Comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
title_sort resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: comparing 3 teaching methods in a randomized controlled trial
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017072
work_keys_str_mv AT weberulrike residentperformanceinbasicperioperativetransesophagealechocardiographycomparing3teachingmethodsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zapletalbernhard residentperformanceinbasicperioperativetransesophagealechocardiographycomparing3teachingmethodsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baseeva residentperformanceinbasicperioperativetransesophagealechocardiographycomparing3teachingmethodsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hambruschmichael residentperformanceinbasicperioperativetransesophagealechocardiographycomparing3teachingmethodsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ristlrobin residentperformanceinbasicperioperativetransesophagealechocardiographycomparing3teachingmethodsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morabruno residentperformanceinbasicperioperativetransesophagealechocardiographycomparing3teachingmethodsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial