Cargando…
Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al.
A recent article in Science Advances described the striking discovery that the commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis strain MO34 displays antimicrobial and antitumor activities by producing a small molecule, identified as the nucleobase analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine (6-HAP). However, in contradictio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3915 |
_version_ | 1783450897070686208 |
---|---|
author | Kozmin, Stanislav G. Rogozin, Igor B. Moore, Elizabeth A. Abney, Mariah Schaaper, Roel M. Pavlov, Youri I. |
author_facet | Kozmin, Stanislav G. Rogozin, Igor B. Moore, Elizabeth A. Abney, Mariah Schaaper, Roel M. Pavlov, Youri I. |
author_sort | Kozmin, Stanislav G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A recent article in Science Advances described the striking discovery that the commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis strain MO34 displays antimicrobial and antitumor activities by producing a small molecule, identified as the nucleobase analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine (6-HAP). However, in contradiction to the literature, the authors claimed that 6-HAP is nonmutagenic and proposed that the toxic effect of 6-HAP results from its ability to inhibit, in its base form, DNA synthesis. To resolve the discrepancy, we proved by genetic experiments with bacteria and yeast that extracts of MO34 do contain a mutagenic compound whose effects are identical to chemically synthesized 6-HAP. The MO34 extract induced the same mutation spectrum as authentic 6-HAP. Notably, the toxic and mutagenic effects of both synthetic and MO34-derived 6-HAP depended on conversion to the corresponding nucleotide. The nucleobase 6-HAP does not inhibit DNA synthesis in vitro, and we conclude that 6-HAP exerts its biological activity when incorporated into DNA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6739109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67391092019-09-18 Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. Kozmin, Stanislav G. Rogozin, Igor B. Moore, Elizabeth A. Abney, Mariah Schaaper, Roel M. Pavlov, Youri I. Sci Adv Technical Comments A recent article in Science Advances described the striking discovery that the commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis strain MO34 displays antimicrobial and antitumor activities by producing a small molecule, identified as the nucleobase analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine (6-HAP). However, in contradiction to the literature, the authors claimed that 6-HAP is nonmutagenic and proposed that the toxic effect of 6-HAP results from its ability to inhibit, in its base form, DNA synthesis. To resolve the discrepancy, we proved by genetic experiments with bacteria and yeast that extracts of MO34 do contain a mutagenic compound whose effects are identical to chemically synthesized 6-HAP. The MO34 extract induced the same mutation spectrum as authentic 6-HAP. Notably, the toxic and mutagenic effects of both synthetic and MO34-derived 6-HAP depended on conversion to the corresponding nucleotide. The nucleobase 6-HAP does not inhibit DNA synthesis in vitro, and we conclude that 6-HAP exerts its biological activity when incorporated into DNA. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6739109/ /pubmed/31535021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3915 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Comments Kozmin, Stanislav G. Rogozin, Igor B. Moore, Elizabeth A. Abney, Mariah Schaaper, Roel M. Pavlov, Youri I. Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. |
title | Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. |
title_full | Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. |
title_fullStr | Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. |
title_full_unstemmed | Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. |
title_short | Comment on “A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by Nakatsuji et al. |
title_sort | comment on “a commensal strain of staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia” by nakatsuji et al. |
topic | Technical Comments |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozminstanislavg commentonacommensalstrainofstaphylococcusepidermidisprotectsagainstskinneoplasiabynakatsujietal AT rogozinigorb commentonacommensalstrainofstaphylococcusepidermidisprotectsagainstskinneoplasiabynakatsujietal AT mooreelizabetha commentonacommensalstrainofstaphylococcusepidermidisprotectsagainstskinneoplasiabynakatsujietal AT abneymariah commentonacommensalstrainofstaphylococcusepidermidisprotectsagainstskinneoplasiabynakatsujietal AT schaaperroelm commentonacommensalstrainofstaphylococcusepidermidisprotectsagainstskinneoplasiabynakatsujietal AT pavlovyourii commentonacommensalstrainofstaphylococcusepidermidisprotectsagainstskinneoplasiabynakatsujietal |