Cargando…

Predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT findings in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

Objectives: To examine the prognostic value of interim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) findings after 2–4 cycles of rituximab, plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Okada, Masaya, Yoshihara, Kyoko, Tokugawa, Tazuko, Sawada, Akihiro, Yoshihara, Satoshi, Tamaki, Hiroya, Fujimori, Yoshihiro, Ueda, Syuji, Kawamoto, Hiroyuki, Taniguchi, Junichi, Yamakado, Koichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534626
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27103
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: To examine the prognostic value of interim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) findings after 2–4 cycles of rituximab, plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving standardized treatment. Results: After a median 3.36 years (range 0.33 to 9.14 years), 24 of the 80 patients had documented relapse. In Interim-PET findings, 2-year PFS was significantly shorter for PET-positive as compared with PET-negative patients (50.0% vs. 86.4%; p = 0.0012). In End-PET findings, 2-year PFS was significantly shorter for PET-positive as compared with PET-negative patients (25.0% vs. 84.7%; p < 0.0001). The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Interim-PET for predicting relapse or disease progression were 57.1% and 75.8%, respectively, while those for End-PET were 75.0% and 75.0%, respectively. Methods: Eighty DLBCL patients treated with first-line 6–8 R-CHOP courses regardless of interim imaging findings were enrolled. Each underwent FDG-PET/CT scanning at staging, and again during (Interim-PET) and at the end of (End-PET) therapy. PET positivity or negativity at Interim-PET and End-PET as related to progression-free survival (PFS) was examined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Conclusion: Mid-treatment FDG-PET/CT findings may be useful for determining disease status in patients with DLBCL undergoing induction R-CHOP chemotherapy, though are not recommended for treatment decisions as part of routine clinical practice.