Cargando…

Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents

IMPORTANCE: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is considered first-line contraception for adolescents but often requires multiple clinic visits to obtain. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Indiana Medicaid’s cost savings associated with providing adolescents with same-day access to LARC. DESIGN, SETTIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Tracey A., Downs, Stephen M., Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31509208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11063
_version_ 1783451008154730496
author Wilkinson, Tracey A.
Downs, Stephen M.
Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne
author_facet Wilkinson, Tracey A.
Downs, Stephen M.
Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne
author_sort Wilkinson, Tracey A.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is considered first-line contraception for adolescents but often requires multiple clinic visits to obtain. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Indiana Medicaid’s cost savings associated with providing adolescents with same-day access to LARC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An economic evaluation of cost minimization from the payer’s (Medicaid) perspective was performed from August 2017 through August 2018. The cost model examined the anticipated outcome of providing LARC at the first visit compared with requiring a second visit for placement. The costs and probabilities of clinic visits, devices, device insertions and removals, unintended pregnancy, and births, according to previously published sources, were incorporated into the model. The participants were payers (Medicaid). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcomes were the cost of same-day LARC placement vs LARC placement at a subsequent visit in US dollars, and rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. One-way sensitivity analysis was done. RESULTS: Same-day LARC placement was associated with lower overall costs ($2016 per patient over 1 year) compared with LARC placement at a subsequent visit ($4133 per patient over 1 year). Compared with the return-visit strategy, same-day LARC was associated with an unintended pregnancy rate of 14% vs 48% and an abortion rate of 4% vs 14%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Providing same-day LARC could save costs for Medicaid, largely by preventing unintended pregnancy. Expected cost savings could be used to implement policies that make this strategy feasible in all clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6739899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67398992019-09-27 Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents Wilkinson, Tracey A. Downs, Stephen M. Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is considered first-line contraception for adolescents but often requires multiple clinic visits to obtain. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Indiana Medicaid’s cost savings associated with providing adolescents with same-day access to LARC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An economic evaluation of cost minimization from the payer’s (Medicaid) perspective was performed from August 2017 through August 2018. The cost model examined the anticipated outcome of providing LARC at the first visit compared with requiring a second visit for placement. The costs and probabilities of clinic visits, devices, device insertions and removals, unintended pregnancy, and births, according to previously published sources, were incorporated into the model. The participants were payers (Medicaid). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcomes were the cost of same-day LARC placement vs LARC placement at a subsequent visit in US dollars, and rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. One-way sensitivity analysis was done. RESULTS: Same-day LARC placement was associated with lower overall costs ($2016 per patient over 1 year) compared with LARC placement at a subsequent visit ($4133 per patient over 1 year). Compared with the return-visit strategy, same-day LARC was associated with an unintended pregnancy rate of 14% vs 48% and an abortion rate of 4% vs 14%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Providing same-day LARC could save costs for Medicaid, largely by preventing unintended pregnancy. Expected cost savings could be used to implement policies that make this strategy feasible in all clinical settings. American Medical Association 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6739899/ /pubmed/31509208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11063 Text en Copyright 2019 Wilkinson TA et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Wilkinson, Tracey A.
Downs, Stephen M.
Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne
Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
title Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
title_full Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
title_fullStr Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
title_short Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
title_sort cost minimization analysis of same-day long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31509208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11063
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsontraceya costminimizationanalysisofsamedaylongactingreversiblecontraceptionforadolescents
AT downsstephenm costminimizationanalysisofsamedaylongactingreversiblecontraceptionforadolescents
AT tuckeredmondsbrownsyne costminimizationanalysisofsamedaylongactingreversiblecontraceptionforadolescents