Cargando…

Deriving objectively-measured sedentary indices from free-living accelerometry data in rural and urban African settings: a cost effective approach

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the agreement between two data reduction approaches for detecting sedentary breaks from uni-axial accelerometry data collected in human participants. Free-living, uni-axial accelerometer data (n = 318) were examined for sedentary breaks using two different methods (Healy–M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cook, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31511063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4606-4
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To investigate the agreement between two data reduction approaches for detecting sedentary breaks from uni-axial accelerometry data collected in human participants. Free-living, uni-axial accelerometer data (n = 318) were examined for sedentary breaks using two different methods (Healy–Matthews; MAH/UFFE). The data were cleaned and reduced using MAH/UFFE Analyzer software and custom Microsoft Excel macro’s, such that the average daily sedentary break number were calculated for each data record, for both methods. RESULTS: The Healy–Matthews and MAH/UFFE average daily break number correlated closely (R(2) = 99.9%) and there was high agreement (mean difference: + 0.7 breaks/day; 95% limits of agreement: − 0.06 to + 1.4 breaks/day). A slight bias of approximately + 1 break/day for the MAH/UFFE Analyzer was evident for both the regression and agreement analyses. At a group level there were no statistically or practically significant differences within sample groups between the two methods.