Cargando…

Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues

Influenced by feedstock type and microbial inoculum, different microbial groups must precisely interact for high‐quality biogas yields. As a first approach for optimization, this study aimed to identify through time the biogas‐producing microbial community in a 10‐ton dry anaerobic digester treating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senés‐Guerrero, Carolina, Colón‐Contreras, Franco A., Reynoso‐Lobo, Javier F., Tinoco‐Pérez, Benito, Siller‐Cepeda, Jorge H., Pacheco, Adriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6741126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.854
_version_ 1783451061656223744
author Senés‐Guerrero, Carolina
Colón‐Contreras, Franco A.
Reynoso‐Lobo, Javier F.
Tinoco‐Pérez, Benito
Siller‐Cepeda, Jorge H.
Pacheco, Adriana
author_facet Senés‐Guerrero, Carolina
Colón‐Contreras, Franco A.
Reynoso‐Lobo, Javier F.
Tinoco‐Pérez, Benito
Siller‐Cepeda, Jorge H.
Pacheco, Adriana
author_sort Senés‐Guerrero, Carolina
collection PubMed
description Influenced by feedstock type and microbial inoculum, different microbial groups must precisely interact for high‐quality biogas yields. As a first approach for optimization, this study aimed to identify through time the biogas‐producing microbial community in a 10‐ton dry anaerobic digester treating cattle manure by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and metagenomics. Moreover, the associated bovine residues or feedstocks (leachate, manure, oxidation lagoon water, rumen) were also characterized to determine their contribution. A diverse and dynamic community characterized by Bacteria (82%–88%) and a considerable amount of Archaea (8%–15%) presented profiles particular to each stage of biogas production. Eukaryotes (2.6%–3.6%), mainly fungi, were a minor but stable component. Proteobacteria represented 47% of the community at the start of the run but only 18% at the end, opposite to the Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi group (8% and 20%, respectively), while Firmicutes (12%–18%) and Actinobacteria (12%–32%) remained relatively constant. Methanogens of the order Methanomicrobiales represented by several species of Methanoculleus were abundant at the end of the run (77%) contrary to Methanosarcinales (11%) and Methanobacteriales (0.7%). Therefore, methanogenesis mainly occurred by the hydrogenotrophic pathway. Manure and oxidation lagoon water seemed to contribute key microorganisms, while rumen dominated by Methanobrevibacter (72%) did not proliferate in the digester. Manure particularly possessed Methanoculleus (24%) and uncultured methanogens identified by DGGE, whereas oxidation lagoon was exclusively abundant in Methanolinea (18%) and Methanosaeta (19%). Leachate, as the microbial inoculum from a previous run, adequately preserved the biogas‐producing community. These results could lead to higher biogas yields through bioaugmentation strategies by incorporating higher proportions or an enriched inoculum from the relevant feedstocks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6741126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67411262019-09-13 Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues Senés‐Guerrero, Carolina Colón‐Contreras, Franco A. Reynoso‐Lobo, Javier F. Tinoco‐Pérez, Benito Siller‐Cepeda, Jorge H. Pacheco, Adriana Microbiologyopen Original Articles Influenced by feedstock type and microbial inoculum, different microbial groups must precisely interact for high‐quality biogas yields. As a first approach for optimization, this study aimed to identify through time the biogas‐producing microbial community in a 10‐ton dry anaerobic digester treating cattle manure by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and metagenomics. Moreover, the associated bovine residues or feedstocks (leachate, manure, oxidation lagoon water, rumen) were also characterized to determine their contribution. A diverse and dynamic community characterized by Bacteria (82%–88%) and a considerable amount of Archaea (8%–15%) presented profiles particular to each stage of biogas production. Eukaryotes (2.6%–3.6%), mainly fungi, were a minor but stable component. Proteobacteria represented 47% of the community at the start of the run but only 18% at the end, opposite to the Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi group (8% and 20%, respectively), while Firmicutes (12%–18%) and Actinobacteria (12%–32%) remained relatively constant. Methanogens of the order Methanomicrobiales represented by several species of Methanoculleus were abundant at the end of the run (77%) contrary to Methanosarcinales (11%) and Methanobacteriales (0.7%). Therefore, methanogenesis mainly occurred by the hydrogenotrophic pathway. Manure and oxidation lagoon water seemed to contribute key microorganisms, while rumen dominated by Methanobrevibacter (72%) did not proliferate in the digester. Manure particularly possessed Methanoculleus (24%) and uncultured methanogens identified by DGGE, whereas oxidation lagoon was exclusively abundant in Methanolinea (18%) and Methanosaeta (19%). Leachate, as the microbial inoculum from a previous run, adequately preserved the biogas‐producing community. These results could lead to higher biogas yields through bioaugmentation strategies by incorporating higher proportions or an enriched inoculum from the relevant feedstocks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6741126/ /pubmed/31129926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.854 Text en © 2019 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Senés‐Guerrero, Carolina
Colón‐Contreras, Franco A.
Reynoso‐Lobo, Javier F.
Tinoco‐Pérez, Benito
Siller‐Cepeda, Jorge H.
Pacheco, Adriana
Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
title Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
title_full Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
title_fullStr Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
title_full_unstemmed Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
title_short Biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
title_sort biogas‐producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6741126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.854
work_keys_str_mv AT senesguerrerocarolina biogasproducingmicrobialcompositionofananaerobicdigesterandassociatedbovineresidues
AT coloncontrerasfrancoa biogasproducingmicrobialcompositionofananaerobicdigesterandassociatedbovineresidues
AT reynosolobojavierf biogasproducingmicrobialcompositionofananaerobicdigesterandassociatedbovineresidues
AT tinocoperezbenito biogasproducingmicrobialcompositionofananaerobicdigesterandassociatedbovineresidues
AT sillercepedajorgeh biogasproducingmicrobialcompositionofananaerobicdigesterandassociatedbovineresidues
AT pachecoadriana biogasproducingmicrobialcompositionofananaerobicdigesterandassociatedbovineresidues