Cargando…

Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence-based treatment for depression that is increasingly implemented in healthcare systems across the world. A new form of rTMS called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be delivered in 3 min and has demonstrated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendlowitz, Andrew B., Shanbour, Alaa, Downar, Jonathan, Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel, Daskalakis, Zafiris J., Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee, Blumberger, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6742475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31513675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222546
_version_ 1783451117317783552
author Mendlowitz, Andrew B.
Shanbour, Alaa
Downar, Jonathan
Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Blumberger, Daniel M.
author_facet Mendlowitz, Andrew B.
Shanbour, Alaa
Downar, Jonathan
Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Blumberger, Daniel M.
author_sort Mendlowitz, Andrew B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence-based treatment for depression that is increasingly implemented in healthcare systems across the world. A new form of rTMS called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be delivered in 3 min and has demonstrated comparable effectiveness to the conventional 37.5 min 10Hz rTMS protocol in patients with depression. OBJECTIVES: To compare the direct treatment costs per course and per remission for iTBS compared to 10Hz rTMS treatment in depression. METHODS: We conducted a cost analysis from a healthcare system perspective using patient-level data from a large randomized non-inferiority trial (THREE-D). Depressed adults 18 to 65 received either 10Hz rTMS or iTBS treatment. Treatment costs were calculated using direct healthcare costs associated with equipment, coils, physician assessments and technician time over the course of treatment. Cost per remission was estimated using the proportion of patients achieving remission following treatment. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and non-parametric bootstrapping was used to estimate uncertainty. RESULTS: From a healthcare system perspective, the average cost per patient was USD$1,108 (SD 166) for a course of iTBS and $1,844 (SD 304) for 10Hz rTMS, with an incremental net savings of $735 (95% CI 688 to 783). The average cost per remission was $3,695 (SD 552) for iTBS and $6,146 (SD 1,015) for 10Hz rTMS, with an average incremental net savings of $2,451 (95% CI 2,293 to 2,610). CONCLUSIONS: The shorter session durations and treatment capacity increase associated with 3 min iTBS translate into significant cost-savings per patient and per remission when compared to 10Hz rTMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6742475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67424752019-09-20 Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis Mendlowitz, Andrew B. Shanbour, Alaa Downar, Jonathan Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel Daskalakis, Zafiris J. Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Blumberger, Daniel M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence-based treatment for depression that is increasingly implemented in healthcare systems across the world. A new form of rTMS called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be delivered in 3 min and has demonstrated comparable effectiveness to the conventional 37.5 min 10Hz rTMS protocol in patients with depression. OBJECTIVES: To compare the direct treatment costs per course and per remission for iTBS compared to 10Hz rTMS treatment in depression. METHODS: We conducted a cost analysis from a healthcare system perspective using patient-level data from a large randomized non-inferiority trial (THREE-D). Depressed adults 18 to 65 received either 10Hz rTMS or iTBS treatment. Treatment costs were calculated using direct healthcare costs associated with equipment, coils, physician assessments and technician time over the course of treatment. Cost per remission was estimated using the proportion of patients achieving remission following treatment. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and non-parametric bootstrapping was used to estimate uncertainty. RESULTS: From a healthcare system perspective, the average cost per patient was USD$1,108 (SD 166) for a course of iTBS and $1,844 (SD 304) for 10Hz rTMS, with an incremental net savings of $735 (95% CI 688 to 783). The average cost per remission was $3,695 (SD 552) for iTBS and $6,146 (SD 1,015) for 10Hz rTMS, with an average incremental net savings of $2,451 (95% CI 2,293 to 2,610). CONCLUSIONS: The shorter session durations and treatment capacity increase associated with 3 min iTBS translate into significant cost-savings per patient and per remission when compared to 10Hz rTMS. Public Library of Science 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6742475/ /pubmed/31513675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222546 Text en © 2019 Mendlowitz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mendlowitz, Andrew B.
Shanbour, Alaa
Downar, Jonathan
Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Blumberger, Daniel M.
Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis
title Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis
title_full Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis
title_fullStr Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis
title_short Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis
title_sort implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: a cost analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6742475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31513675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222546
work_keys_str_mv AT mendlowitzandrewb implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis
AT shanbouralaa implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis
AT downarjonathan implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis
AT vilarodriguezfidel implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis
AT daskalakiszafirisj implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis
AT isaranuwatchaiwanrudee implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis
AT blumbergerdanielm implementationofintermittentthetaburststimulationcomparedtoconventionalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionacostanalysis