Cargando…
Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
BACKGROUND: The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probabilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6742918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0928-1 |
_version_ | 1783451187468566528 |
---|---|
author | Grazzi, Licia Tassorelli, Cristina de Tommaso, Marina Pierangeli, Giulia Martelletti, Paolo Rainero, Innocenzo Geppetti, Pierangelo Ambrosini, Anna Sarchielli, Paola Liebler, Eric Barbanti, Piero |
author_facet | Grazzi, Licia Tassorelli, Cristina de Tommaso, Marina Pierangeli, Giulia Martelletti, Paolo Rainero, Innocenzo Geppetti, Pierangelo Ambrosini, Anna Sarchielli, Paola Liebler, Eric Barbanti, Piero |
author_sort | Grazzi, Licia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post stimulation. Here, we examined additional data from PRESTO to provide further insights into the practical utility of nVNS by evaluating its ability to consistently deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity while reducing the need for rescue medication. METHODS: Patients recorded pain intensity for treated migraine attacks on a 4-point scale. Data were examined to compare nVNS and sham with regard to the percentage of patients who benefited by at least 1 point in pain intensity. We also assessed the percentage of attacks that required rescue medication and pain-free rates stratified by pain intensity at treatment initiation. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients who used acute nVNS treatment (n = 120) vs sham (n = 123) reported a ≥ 1-point decrease in pain intensity at 30 min (nVNS, 32.2%; sham, 18.5%; P = 0.020), 60 min (nVNS, 38.8%; sham, 24.0%; P = 0.017), and 120 min (nVNS, 46.8%; sham, 26.2%; P = 0.002) after the first attack. Similar significant results were seen when assessing the benefit in all attacks. The proportion of patients who did not require rescue medication was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham for the first attack (nVNS, 59.3%; sham, 41.9%; P = 0.013) and all attacks (nVNS, 52.3%; sham, 37.3%; P = 0.008). When initial pain intensity was mild, the percentage of patients with no pain after treatment was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham at 60 min (all attacks: nVNS, 37.0%; sham, 21.2%; P = 0.025) and 120 min (first attack: nVNS, 50.0%; sham, 25.0%; P = 0.018; all attacks: nVNS, 46.7%; sham, 30.1%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that acute nVNS treatment quickly and consistently reduced pain intensity while decreasing rescue medication use. These clinical benefits provide guidance in the optimal use of nVNS in everyday practice, which can potentially reduce use of acute pharmacologic medications and their associated adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6742918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67429182019-09-16 Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial Grazzi, Licia Tassorelli, Cristina de Tommaso, Marina Pierangeli, Giulia Martelletti, Paolo Rainero, Innocenzo Geppetti, Pierangelo Ambrosini, Anna Sarchielli, Paola Liebler, Eric Barbanti, Piero J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post stimulation. Here, we examined additional data from PRESTO to provide further insights into the practical utility of nVNS by evaluating its ability to consistently deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity while reducing the need for rescue medication. METHODS: Patients recorded pain intensity for treated migraine attacks on a 4-point scale. Data were examined to compare nVNS and sham with regard to the percentage of patients who benefited by at least 1 point in pain intensity. We also assessed the percentage of attacks that required rescue medication and pain-free rates stratified by pain intensity at treatment initiation. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients who used acute nVNS treatment (n = 120) vs sham (n = 123) reported a ≥ 1-point decrease in pain intensity at 30 min (nVNS, 32.2%; sham, 18.5%; P = 0.020), 60 min (nVNS, 38.8%; sham, 24.0%; P = 0.017), and 120 min (nVNS, 46.8%; sham, 26.2%; P = 0.002) after the first attack. Similar significant results were seen when assessing the benefit in all attacks. The proportion of patients who did not require rescue medication was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham for the first attack (nVNS, 59.3%; sham, 41.9%; P = 0.013) and all attacks (nVNS, 52.3%; sham, 37.3%; P = 0.008). When initial pain intensity was mild, the percentage of patients with no pain after treatment was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham at 60 min (all attacks: nVNS, 37.0%; sham, 21.2%; P = 0.025) and 120 min (first attack: nVNS, 50.0%; sham, 25.0%; P = 0.018; all attacks: nVNS, 46.7%; sham, 30.1%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that acute nVNS treatment quickly and consistently reduced pain intensity while decreasing rescue medication use. These clinical benefits provide guidance in the optimal use of nVNS in everyday practice, which can potentially reduce use of acute pharmacologic medications and their associated adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034. Springer Milan 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6742918/ /pubmed/30340460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0928-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018, corrected publication November/2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grazzi, Licia Tassorelli, Cristina de Tommaso, Marina Pierangeli, Giulia Martelletti, Paolo Rainero, Innocenzo Geppetti, Pierangelo Ambrosini, Anna Sarchielli, Paola Liebler, Eric Barbanti, Piero Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial |
title | Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial |
title_full | Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial |
title_fullStr | Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial |
title_short | Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial |
title_sort | practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nvns) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind presto trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6742918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0928-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grazzilicia practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT tassorellicristina practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT detommasomarina practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT pierangeligiulia practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT martellettipaolo practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT raineroinnocenzo practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT geppettipierangelo practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT ambrosinianna practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT sarchiellipaola practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT lieblereric practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT barbantipiero practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial AT practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial |