Cargando…

Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial

BACKGROUND: The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probabilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grazzi, Licia, Tassorelli, Cristina, de Tommaso, Marina, Pierangeli, Giulia, Martelletti, Paolo, Rainero, Innocenzo, Geppetti, Pierangelo, Ambrosini, Anna, Sarchielli, Paola, Liebler, Eric, Barbanti, Piero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6742918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0928-1
_version_ 1783451187468566528
author Grazzi, Licia
Tassorelli, Cristina
de Tommaso, Marina
Pierangeli, Giulia
Martelletti, Paolo
Rainero, Innocenzo
Geppetti, Pierangelo
Ambrosini, Anna
Sarchielli, Paola
Liebler, Eric
Barbanti, Piero
author_facet Grazzi, Licia
Tassorelli, Cristina
de Tommaso, Marina
Pierangeli, Giulia
Martelletti, Paolo
Rainero, Innocenzo
Geppetti, Pierangelo
Ambrosini, Anna
Sarchielli, Paola
Liebler, Eric
Barbanti, Piero
author_sort Grazzi, Licia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post stimulation. Here, we examined additional data from PRESTO to provide further insights into the practical utility of nVNS by evaluating its ability to consistently deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity while reducing the need for rescue medication. METHODS: Patients recorded pain intensity for treated migraine attacks on a 4-point scale. Data were examined to compare nVNS and sham with regard to the percentage of patients who benefited by at least 1 point in pain intensity. We also assessed the percentage of attacks that required rescue medication and pain-free rates stratified by pain intensity at treatment initiation. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients who used acute nVNS treatment (n = 120) vs sham (n = 123) reported a ≥ 1-point decrease in pain intensity at 30 min (nVNS, 32.2%; sham, 18.5%; P = 0.020), 60 min (nVNS, 38.8%; sham, 24.0%; P = 0.017), and 120 min (nVNS, 46.8%; sham, 26.2%; P = 0.002) after the first attack. Similar significant results were seen when assessing the benefit in all attacks. The proportion of patients who did not require rescue medication was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham for the first attack (nVNS, 59.3%; sham, 41.9%; P = 0.013) and all attacks (nVNS, 52.3%; sham, 37.3%; P = 0.008). When initial pain intensity was mild, the percentage of patients with no pain after treatment was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham at 60 min (all attacks: nVNS, 37.0%; sham, 21.2%; P = 0.025) and 120 min (first attack: nVNS, 50.0%; sham, 25.0%; P = 0.018; all attacks: nVNS, 46.7%; sham, 30.1%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that acute nVNS treatment quickly and consistently reduced pain intensity while decreasing rescue medication use. These clinical benefits provide guidance in the optimal use of nVNS in everyday practice, which can potentially reduce use of acute pharmacologic medications and their associated adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6742918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67429182019-09-16 Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial Grazzi, Licia Tassorelli, Cristina de Tommaso, Marina Pierangeli, Giulia Martelletti, Paolo Rainero, Innocenzo Geppetti, Pierangelo Ambrosini, Anna Sarchielli, Paola Liebler, Eric Barbanti, Piero J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post stimulation. Here, we examined additional data from PRESTO to provide further insights into the practical utility of nVNS by evaluating its ability to consistently deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity while reducing the need for rescue medication. METHODS: Patients recorded pain intensity for treated migraine attacks on a 4-point scale. Data were examined to compare nVNS and sham with regard to the percentage of patients who benefited by at least 1 point in pain intensity. We also assessed the percentage of attacks that required rescue medication and pain-free rates stratified by pain intensity at treatment initiation. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients who used acute nVNS treatment (n = 120) vs sham (n = 123) reported a ≥ 1-point decrease in pain intensity at 30 min (nVNS, 32.2%; sham, 18.5%; P = 0.020), 60 min (nVNS, 38.8%; sham, 24.0%; P = 0.017), and 120 min (nVNS, 46.8%; sham, 26.2%; P = 0.002) after the first attack. Similar significant results were seen when assessing the benefit in all attacks. The proportion of patients who did not require rescue medication was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham for the first attack (nVNS, 59.3%; sham, 41.9%; P = 0.013) and all attacks (nVNS, 52.3%; sham, 37.3%; P = 0.008). When initial pain intensity was mild, the percentage of patients with no pain after treatment was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham at 60 min (all attacks: nVNS, 37.0%; sham, 21.2%; P = 0.025) and 120 min (first attack: nVNS, 50.0%; sham, 25.0%; P = 0.018; all attacks: nVNS, 46.7%; sham, 30.1%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that acute nVNS treatment quickly and consistently reduced pain intensity while decreasing rescue medication use. These clinical benefits provide guidance in the optimal use of nVNS in everyday practice, which can potentially reduce use of acute pharmacologic medications and their associated adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034. Springer Milan 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6742918/ /pubmed/30340460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0928-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018, corrected publication November/2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grazzi, Licia
Tassorelli, Cristina
de Tommaso, Marina
Pierangeli, Giulia
Martelletti, Paolo
Rainero, Innocenzo
Geppetti, Pierangelo
Ambrosini, Anna
Sarchielli, Paola
Liebler, Eric
Barbanti, Piero
Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
title Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
title_full Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
title_fullStr Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
title_full_unstemmed Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
title_short Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
title_sort practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nvns) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind presto trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6742918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0928-1
work_keys_str_mv AT grazzilicia practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT tassorellicristina practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT detommasomarina practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT pierangeligiulia practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT martellettipaolo practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT raineroinnocenzo practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT geppettipierangelo practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT ambrosinianna practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT sarchiellipaola practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT lieblereric practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT barbantipiero practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial
AT practicalandclinicalutilityofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationnvnsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineaposthocanalysisoftherandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprestotrial