Cargando…

Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and printing for the production of models is an innovative tool that can be used in veterinary anatomy practical classes. Ease of access to this teaching material can be an important aspect of learning the anatomy of domestic animals. In this study, a scan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Alcântara Leite dos Reis, Daniela, Gouveia, Beatriz Laura Rojas, Júnior, José Carlos Rosa, de Assis Neto, Antônio Chaves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0050-2
_version_ 1783451209569402880
author de Alcântara Leite dos Reis, Daniela
Gouveia, Beatriz Laura Rojas
Júnior, José Carlos Rosa
de Assis Neto, Antônio Chaves
author_facet de Alcântara Leite dos Reis, Daniela
Gouveia, Beatriz Laura Rojas
Júnior, José Carlos Rosa
de Assis Neto, Antônio Chaves
author_sort de Alcântara Leite dos Reis, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and printing for the production of models is an innovative tool that can be used in veterinary anatomy practical classes. Ease of access to this teaching material can be an important aspect of learning the anatomy of domestic animals. In this study, a scanner was used to capture 3D images and a 3D printer that performs die-cast printing was used to produce skeletal models of the thoracic limb of a horse. METHODS: Bones from a horse were selected for scanning and creation of 3D-printed models. The printer used a filamentous thermoplastic material (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene [ABS]) which was deposited together with a support resin. Comparisons of the anatomical characteristics (measurements from the original and printed bone) were analyzed to determine the p-value. RESULTS: Bones from the thoracic limb: scapula, humerus, radius and ulna, carpus and phalanges were used to produce digital and physical models for 3D impressions. Then the anatomical characteristics of the 3D printed models were compared with those of the original bones. The p-value was measured to be 0.9126, indicative of a strong evidence of similarity between the 3D-printed models and specimens. Thus, there was no significant statistical difference between the models and the original anatomical parts. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical characteristics were successfully identified in the 3D-printed copies, demonstrating that models of animal bones can be reproduced using 3D printing technology for use in veterinary education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6743042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67430422019-09-16 Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing de Alcântara Leite dos Reis, Daniela Gouveia, Beatriz Laura Rojas Júnior, José Carlos Rosa de Assis Neto, Antônio Chaves 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and printing for the production of models is an innovative tool that can be used in veterinary anatomy practical classes. Ease of access to this teaching material can be an important aspect of learning the anatomy of domestic animals. In this study, a scanner was used to capture 3D images and a 3D printer that performs die-cast printing was used to produce skeletal models of the thoracic limb of a horse. METHODS: Bones from a horse were selected for scanning and creation of 3D-printed models. The printer used a filamentous thermoplastic material (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene [ABS]) which was deposited together with a support resin. Comparisons of the anatomical characteristics (measurements from the original and printed bone) were analyzed to determine the p-value. RESULTS: Bones from the thoracic limb: scapula, humerus, radius and ulna, carpus and phalanges were used to produce digital and physical models for 3D impressions. Then the anatomical characteristics of the 3D printed models were compared with those of the original bones. The p-value was measured to be 0.9126, indicative of a strong evidence of similarity between the 3D-printed models and specimens. Thus, there was no significant statistical difference between the models and the original anatomical parts. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical characteristics were successfully identified in the 3D-printed copies, demonstrating that models of animal bones can be reproduced using 3D printing technology for use in veterinary education. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6743042/ /pubmed/31375944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0050-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
de Alcântara Leite dos Reis, Daniela
Gouveia, Beatriz Laura Rojas
Júnior, José Carlos Rosa
de Assis Neto, Antônio Chaves
Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing
title Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing
title_full Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing
title_short Comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3D printing
title_sort comparative assessment of anatomical details of thoracic limb bones of a horse to that of models produced via scanning and 3d printing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0050-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dealcantaraleitedosreisdaniela comparativeassessmentofanatomicaldetailsofthoraciclimbbonesofahorsetothatofmodelsproducedviascanningand3dprinting
AT gouveiabeatrizlaurarojas comparativeassessmentofanatomicaldetailsofthoraciclimbbonesofahorsetothatofmodelsproducedviascanningand3dprinting
AT juniorjosecarlosrosa comparativeassessmentofanatomicaldetailsofthoraciclimbbonesofahorsetothatofmodelsproducedviascanningand3dprinting
AT deassisnetoantoniochaves comparativeassessmentofanatomicaldetailsofthoraciclimbbonesofahorsetothatofmodelsproducedviascanningand3dprinting