Cargando…

Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis

BACKGROUND: The optimal number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer (GC) is still debatable and previous studies proposing new classification alternatives mostly focused on the number of retrieved LNs without proper consideration on the anatomic nodal groups’ location. Here, we assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Siwei, Wang, Pengliang, Xing, Yanan, Li, Kai, Wang, Zhenning, Xu, Huimian, Zhu, Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0394-4
_version_ 1783451214641364992
author Pan, Siwei
Wang, Pengliang
Xing, Yanan
Li, Kai
Wang, Zhenning
Xu, Huimian
Zhu, Zhi
author_facet Pan, Siwei
Wang, Pengliang
Xing, Yanan
Li, Kai
Wang, Zhenning
Xu, Huimian
Zhu, Zhi
author_sort Pan, Siwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer (GC) is still debatable and previous studies proposing new classification alternatives mostly focused on the number of retrieved LNs without proper consideration on the anatomic nodal groups’ location. Here, we assessed the impact of retrieved LNs from different nodal location groups on the survival of GC patients. METHODS: Stage I–III gastric cancer patients who had radical gastrectomy were investigated. LN grouping was determined according to the 13th edition of the JCGC. The optimal cut-off values of retrieved LNs in different LN groups (Group 1 and 2) were calculated, based on which a proposed nodal classification (rN) simultaneously accounting the optimal number and location of retrieved LNs was proposed. The performance of rN was then compared to that of LN ratio, log-odds of metastatic LNs (LODDs) and the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) N classification. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values for Group 1 and 2 were 13 and 9, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was higher for patients in retrieved Group 1 LNs > 13 (vs. Group 1 LNs ≤ 13, 63.2% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.005) and retrieved Group 2 LNs > 9 (vs. Group 2 LNs ≤ 9, 72.5% vs. 60.7%, P = 0.009). Patients staged as pN0–3b were sub classified using this Group 1 and 2 nodal analogy. The OS of pN0–N2 patients in retrieved Group 1 LNs > 13 or Group 2 LNs > 9 were superior to those in retrieved Group 1 LNs ≤ 13 and Group 2 LNs ≤ 9 (All P < 0.05); except for pN3 patients. The rN classification was formulated and demonstrated better 5-year OS prognostication performance as compared to the LNR, LODDs, and the 8th UICC/AJCC N staging system. CONCLUSIONS: The retrieval of > 13 and > 9 LNs for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, could represent an alternative lymph node retrieval approach in radical gastrectomy for more precise survival prognostication and minimizing staging migration, especially if > 16 LNs is found to be difficult.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6743096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67430962019-09-16 Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis Pan, Siwei Wang, Pengliang Xing, Yanan Li, Kai Wang, Zhenning Xu, Huimian Zhu, Zhi Cancer Commun (Lond) Original Article BACKGROUND: The optimal number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer (GC) is still debatable and previous studies proposing new classification alternatives mostly focused on the number of retrieved LNs without proper consideration on the anatomic nodal groups’ location. Here, we assessed the impact of retrieved LNs from different nodal location groups on the survival of GC patients. METHODS: Stage I–III gastric cancer patients who had radical gastrectomy were investigated. LN grouping was determined according to the 13th edition of the JCGC. The optimal cut-off values of retrieved LNs in different LN groups (Group 1 and 2) were calculated, based on which a proposed nodal classification (rN) simultaneously accounting the optimal number and location of retrieved LNs was proposed. The performance of rN was then compared to that of LN ratio, log-odds of metastatic LNs (LODDs) and the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) N classification. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values for Group 1 and 2 were 13 and 9, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was higher for patients in retrieved Group 1 LNs > 13 (vs. Group 1 LNs ≤ 13, 63.2% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.005) and retrieved Group 2 LNs > 9 (vs. Group 2 LNs ≤ 9, 72.5% vs. 60.7%, P = 0.009). Patients staged as pN0–3b were sub classified using this Group 1 and 2 nodal analogy. The OS of pN0–N2 patients in retrieved Group 1 LNs > 13 or Group 2 LNs > 9 were superior to those in retrieved Group 1 LNs ≤ 13 and Group 2 LNs ≤ 9 (All P < 0.05); except for pN3 patients. The rN classification was formulated and demonstrated better 5-year OS prognostication performance as compared to the LNR, LODDs, and the 8th UICC/AJCC N staging system. CONCLUSIONS: The retrieval of > 13 and > 9 LNs for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, could represent an alternative lymph node retrieval approach in radical gastrectomy for more precise survival prognostication and minimizing staging migration, especially if > 16 LNs is found to be difficult. BioMed Central 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6743096/ /pubmed/31519217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0394-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pan, Siwei
Wang, Pengliang
Xing, Yanan
Li, Kai
Wang, Zhenning
Xu, Huimian
Zhu, Zhi
Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
title Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
title_full Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
title_fullStr Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
title_full_unstemmed Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
title_short Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
title_sort retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0394-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pansiwei retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis
AT wangpengliang retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis
AT xingyanan retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis
AT likai retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis
AT wangzhenning retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis
AT xuhuimian retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis
AT zhuzhi retrievedlymphnodesfromdifferentanatomicgroupsingastriccanceraproposedoptimalnumbercomparisonwithothernodalclassificationstrategiesanditsimpactonprognosis