Cargando…

Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab

BACKGROUND: To compare the reoperation rate in patients with vitreous hemorrhage (VH) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with or without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 280 patients (362 eyes) with diabetic VH were divided into a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xuting, Pan, Qintuo, Zheng, Jingwei, Song, Zongming, Zhang, Zongduan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1179-x
_version_ 1783451217244979200
author Hu, Xuting
Pan, Qintuo
Zheng, Jingwei
Song, Zongming
Zhang, Zongduan
author_facet Hu, Xuting
Pan, Qintuo
Zheng, Jingwei
Song, Zongming
Zhang, Zongduan
author_sort Hu, Xuting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the reoperation rate in patients with vitreous hemorrhage (VH) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with or without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 280 patients (362 eyes) with diabetic VH were divided into a group that received preoperative IVB and a group that did not receive preoperative IVB. According to B-scan or color Doppler ultrasonography, the eyes were grouped as a VH group and a tractional retinal detachment (TRD) group. The reoperation rate, visual and anatomical outcomes of treatment were evaluated after 6 months. RESULTS: There were 17.4% of eyes in the VH group that did not receive preoperative IVB later required additional vitrectomy, while only 7.7% of the eyes in the VH group that received preoperative IVB required additional vitrectomy (P = 0.025). There were 45.5% of eyes in the TRD group that did not receive preoperative IVB had no reoperation, while only 21.4% of the eyes in the TRD group that received preoperative IVB had no reoperation (P = 0.004). The patients with one operation achieved better vision than those required reoperations in the VH group (P = 0.038) and TRD group (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IVB significantly reduced the re-vitrectomy rate in patients with VH without TRD, but there was an increase in the reoperation rate in patients with VH combined with TRD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6743107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67431072019-09-16 Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab Hu, Xuting Pan, Qintuo Zheng, Jingwei Song, Zongming Zhang, Zongduan BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the reoperation rate in patients with vitreous hemorrhage (VH) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with or without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 280 patients (362 eyes) with diabetic VH were divided into a group that received preoperative IVB and a group that did not receive preoperative IVB. According to B-scan or color Doppler ultrasonography, the eyes were grouped as a VH group and a tractional retinal detachment (TRD) group. The reoperation rate, visual and anatomical outcomes of treatment were evaluated after 6 months. RESULTS: There were 17.4% of eyes in the VH group that did not receive preoperative IVB later required additional vitrectomy, while only 7.7% of the eyes in the VH group that received preoperative IVB required additional vitrectomy (P = 0.025). There were 45.5% of eyes in the TRD group that did not receive preoperative IVB had no reoperation, while only 21.4% of the eyes in the TRD group that received preoperative IVB had no reoperation (P = 0.004). The patients with one operation achieved better vision than those required reoperations in the VH group (P = 0.038) and TRD group (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IVB significantly reduced the re-vitrectomy rate in patients with VH without TRD, but there was an increase in the reoperation rate in patients with VH combined with TRD. BioMed Central 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6743107/ /pubmed/31519158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1179-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Xuting
Pan, Qintuo
Zheng, Jingwei
Song, Zongming
Zhang, Zongduan
Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
title Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
title_full Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
title_fullStr Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
title_full_unstemmed Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
title_short Reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
title_sort reoperation following vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage with versus without preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1179-x
work_keys_str_mv AT huxuting reoperationfollowingvitrectomyfordiabeticvitreoushemorrhagewithversuswithoutpreoperativeintravitrealbevacizumab
AT panqintuo reoperationfollowingvitrectomyfordiabeticvitreoushemorrhagewithversuswithoutpreoperativeintravitrealbevacizumab
AT zhengjingwei reoperationfollowingvitrectomyfordiabeticvitreoushemorrhagewithversuswithoutpreoperativeintravitrealbevacizumab
AT songzongming reoperationfollowingvitrectomyfordiabeticvitreoushemorrhagewithversuswithoutpreoperativeintravitrealbevacizumab
AT zhangzongduan reoperationfollowingvitrectomyfordiabeticvitreoushemorrhagewithversuswithoutpreoperativeintravitrealbevacizumab