Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2 |
_version_ | 1783451218483347456 |
---|---|
author | Scher, Nathaniel Bollet, Marc Bouilhol, Gauthier Tannouri, Remi Khemiri, Imane Vouillaume, Aurelie Sellami, Noura Von Eyben, Rie Vannetzel, Jean-Michel Darmon, Ilan Rotenberg, Luc Lamallem, Hanah Bauduceau, Olivier Foster, Denis Toledano, Alain |
author_facet | Scher, Nathaniel Bollet, Marc Bouilhol, Gauthier Tannouri, Remi Khemiri, Imane Vouillaume, Aurelie Sellami, Noura Von Eyben, Rie Vannetzel, Jean-Michel Darmon, Ilan Rotenberg, Luc Lamallem, Hanah Bauduceau, Olivier Foster, Denis Toledano, Alain |
author_sort | Scher, Nathaniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. RESULTS: Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. CONCLUSION: Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6743112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67431122019-09-16 Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking Scher, Nathaniel Bollet, Marc Bouilhol, Gauthier Tannouri, Remi Khemiri, Imane Vouillaume, Aurelie Sellami, Noura Von Eyben, Rie Vannetzel, Jean-Michel Darmon, Ilan Rotenberg, Luc Lamallem, Hanah Bauduceau, Olivier Foster, Denis Toledano, Alain Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. RESULTS: Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. CONCLUSION: Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors. BioMed Central 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6743112/ /pubmed/31519194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Scher, Nathaniel Bollet, Marc Bouilhol, Gauthier Tannouri, Remi Khemiri, Imane Vouillaume, Aurelie Sellami, Noura Von Eyben, Rie Vannetzel, Jean-Michel Darmon, Ilan Rotenberg, Luc Lamallem, Hanah Bauduceau, Olivier Foster, Denis Toledano, Alain Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
title | Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schernathaniel safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT bolletmarc safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT bouilholgauthier safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT tannouriremi safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT khemiriimane safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT vouillaumeaurelie safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT sellaminoura safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT voneybenrie safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT vannetzeljeanmichel safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT darmonilan safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT rotenbergluc safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT lamallemhanah safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT bauduceauolivier safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT fosterdenis safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking AT toledanoalain safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking |