Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scher, Nathaniel, Bollet, Marc, Bouilhol, Gauthier, Tannouri, Remi, Khemiri, Imane, Vouillaume, Aurelie, Sellami, Noura, Von Eyben, Rie, Vannetzel, Jean-Michel, Darmon, Ilan, Rotenberg, Luc, Lamallem, Hanah, Bauduceau, Olivier, Foster, Denis, Toledano, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2
_version_ 1783451218483347456
author Scher, Nathaniel
Bollet, Marc
Bouilhol, Gauthier
Tannouri, Remi
Khemiri, Imane
Vouillaume, Aurelie
Sellami, Noura
Von Eyben, Rie
Vannetzel, Jean-Michel
Darmon, Ilan
Rotenberg, Luc
Lamallem, Hanah
Bauduceau, Olivier
Foster, Denis
Toledano, Alain
author_facet Scher, Nathaniel
Bollet, Marc
Bouilhol, Gauthier
Tannouri, Remi
Khemiri, Imane
Vouillaume, Aurelie
Sellami, Noura
Von Eyben, Rie
Vannetzel, Jean-Michel
Darmon, Ilan
Rotenberg, Luc
Lamallem, Hanah
Bauduceau, Olivier
Foster, Denis
Toledano, Alain
author_sort Scher, Nathaniel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. RESULTS: Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. CONCLUSION: Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6743112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67431122019-09-16 Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking Scher, Nathaniel Bollet, Marc Bouilhol, Gauthier Tannouri, Remi Khemiri, Imane Vouillaume, Aurelie Sellami, Noura Von Eyben, Rie Vannetzel, Jean-Michel Darmon, Ilan Rotenberg, Luc Lamallem, Hanah Bauduceau, Olivier Foster, Denis Toledano, Alain Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. RESULTS: Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. CONCLUSION: Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors. BioMed Central 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6743112/ /pubmed/31519194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Scher, Nathaniel
Bollet, Marc
Bouilhol, Gauthier
Tannouri, Remi
Khemiri, Imane
Vouillaume, Aurelie
Sellami, Noura
Von Eyben, Rie
Vannetzel, Jean-Michel
Darmon, Ilan
Rotenberg, Luc
Lamallem, Hanah
Bauduceau, Olivier
Foster, Denis
Toledano, Alain
Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_full Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_short Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_sort safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schernathaniel safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT bolletmarc safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT bouilholgauthier safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT tannouriremi safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT khemiriimane safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT vouillaumeaurelie safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT sellaminoura safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT voneybenrie safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT vannetzeljeanmichel safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT darmonilan safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT rotenbergluc safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT lamallemhanah safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT bauduceauolivier safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT fosterdenis safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT toledanoalain safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking