Cargando…

Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD

INTRODUCTION: Inhalation devices affect both the effectiveness and the therapeutic outcomes in persistent airway obstruction, and the effects are largely independent of the drug(s) assumed. Usability is a complex and comprehensive indicator of inhalation devices’ performance. The Global Usability Sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dal Negro, Roberto W., Turco, Paola, Povero, Massimiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5
_version_ 1783451221933162496
author Dal Negro, Roberto W.
Turco, Paola
Povero, Massimiliano
author_facet Dal Negro, Roberto W.
Turco, Paola
Povero, Massimiliano
author_sort Dal Negro, Roberto W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Inhalation devices affect both the effectiveness and the therapeutic outcomes in persistent airway obstruction, and the effects are largely independent of the drug(s) assumed. Usability is a complex and comprehensive indicator of inhalation devices’ performance. The Global Usability Score (GUS) Questionnaire is an investigational tool designed to assess objectively the patients’-related and unrelated domains of devices’ usability. METHODS: The GUS questionnaire was administered to all consecutive COPD patients referring for three months to the Lung Unit of CEMS Specialist Centre (Verona, Italy). The usability of seven Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) indicated as appropriate in COPD was tested and compared: Breezhaler, Diskus, Ellipta, Genuair, Nexthaler, Spiromax, and Turbohaler. Patients were divided in two groups, checked separately, according to their DPIs previous experience. A Bayesian Indirect Comparison (IC) model was built to assess “global usability” ranking. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were investigated: 74 patients already instructed in DPI use and 29 naive to DPIs. IC analysis proved Ellipta as the device characterized by the highest usability, while Breezhaler the device with the lowest usability in both groups of COPD patients (both with probability > 90%). Moreover, Turbohaler ranked second according to the Bayesian pooling, followed by Diskus, Spiromax, Nexthaler, and Genuair in patients already instructed in DPI use, while the ranking order was not as much well defined in naïve patients, likely due to their too small sample. CONCLUSIONS: Usability is a multifaceted indicator that contributes to assess the factual DPIs’ convenience in real life. DPIs are characterized by different levels of real-life usability, which can be checked, compared and ranked by means of the GUS score. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6743127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67431272019-09-16 Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD Dal Negro, Roberto W. Turco, Paola Povero, Massimiliano Multidiscip Respir Med Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Inhalation devices affect both the effectiveness and the therapeutic outcomes in persistent airway obstruction, and the effects are largely independent of the drug(s) assumed. Usability is a complex and comprehensive indicator of inhalation devices’ performance. The Global Usability Score (GUS) Questionnaire is an investigational tool designed to assess objectively the patients’-related and unrelated domains of devices’ usability. METHODS: The GUS questionnaire was administered to all consecutive COPD patients referring for three months to the Lung Unit of CEMS Specialist Centre (Verona, Italy). The usability of seven Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) indicated as appropriate in COPD was tested and compared: Breezhaler, Diskus, Ellipta, Genuair, Nexthaler, Spiromax, and Turbohaler. Patients were divided in two groups, checked separately, according to their DPIs previous experience. A Bayesian Indirect Comparison (IC) model was built to assess “global usability” ranking. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were investigated: 74 patients already instructed in DPI use and 29 naive to DPIs. IC analysis proved Ellipta as the device characterized by the highest usability, while Breezhaler the device with the lowest usability in both groups of COPD patients (both with probability > 90%). Moreover, Turbohaler ranked second according to the Bayesian pooling, followed by Diskus, Spiromax, Nexthaler, and Genuair in patients already instructed in DPI use, while the ranking order was not as much well defined in naïve patients, likely due to their too small sample. CONCLUSIONS: Usability is a multifaceted indicator that contributes to assess the factual DPIs’ convenience in real life. DPIs are characterized by different levels of real-life usability, which can be checked, compared and ranked by means of the GUS score. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6743127/ /pubmed/31528340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Dal Negro, Roberto W.
Turco, Paola
Povero, Massimiliano
Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
title Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
title_full Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
title_fullStr Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
title_short Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
title_sort patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in copd
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dalnegrorobertow patientsusabilityofsevenmostuseddrypowderinhalersincopd
AT turcopaola patientsusabilityofsevenmostuseddrypowderinhalersincopd
AT poveromassimiliano patientsusabilityofsevenmostuseddrypowderinhalersincopd