Cargando…
Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD
INTRODUCTION: Inhalation devices affect both the effectiveness and the therapeutic outcomes in persistent airway obstruction, and the effects are largely independent of the drug(s) assumed. Usability is a complex and comprehensive indicator of inhalation devices’ performance. The Global Usability Sc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5 |
_version_ | 1783451221933162496 |
---|---|
author | Dal Negro, Roberto W. Turco, Paola Povero, Massimiliano |
author_facet | Dal Negro, Roberto W. Turco, Paola Povero, Massimiliano |
author_sort | Dal Negro, Roberto W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Inhalation devices affect both the effectiveness and the therapeutic outcomes in persistent airway obstruction, and the effects are largely independent of the drug(s) assumed. Usability is a complex and comprehensive indicator of inhalation devices’ performance. The Global Usability Score (GUS) Questionnaire is an investigational tool designed to assess objectively the patients’-related and unrelated domains of devices’ usability. METHODS: The GUS questionnaire was administered to all consecutive COPD patients referring for three months to the Lung Unit of CEMS Specialist Centre (Verona, Italy). The usability of seven Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) indicated as appropriate in COPD was tested and compared: Breezhaler, Diskus, Ellipta, Genuair, Nexthaler, Spiromax, and Turbohaler. Patients were divided in two groups, checked separately, according to their DPIs previous experience. A Bayesian Indirect Comparison (IC) model was built to assess “global usability” ranking. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were investigated: 74 patients already instructed in DPI use and 29 naive to DPIs. IC analysis proved Ellipta as the device characterized by the highest usability, while Breezhaler the device with the lowest usability in both groups of COPD patients (both with probability > 90%). Moreover, Turbohaler ranked second according to the Bayesian pooling, followed by Diskus, Spiromax, Nexthaler, and Genuair in patients already instructed in DPI use, while the ranking order was not as much well defined in naïve patients, likely due to their too small sample. CONCLUSIONS: Usability is a multifaceted indicator that contributes to assess the factual DPIs’ convenience in real life. DPIs are characterized by different levels of real-life usability, which can be checked, compared and ranked by means of the GUS score. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6743127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67431272019-09-16 Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD Dal Negro, Roberto W. Turco, Paola Povero, Massimiliano Multidiscip Respir Med Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Inhalation devices affect both the effectiveness and the therapeutic outcomes in persistent airway obstruction, and the effects are largely independent of the drug(s) assumed. Usability is a complex and comprehensive indicator of inhalation devices’ performance. The Global Usability Score (GUS) Questionnaire is an investigational tool designed to assess objectively the patients’-related and unrelated domains of devices’ usability. METHODS: The GUS questionnaire was administered to all consecutive COPD patients referring for three months to the Lung Unit of CEMS Specialist Centre (Verona, Italy). The usability of seven Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) indicated as appropriate in COPD was tested and compared: Breezhaler, Diskus, Ellipta, Genuair, Nexthaler, Spiromax, and Turbohaler. Patients were divided in two groups, checked separately, according to their DPIs previous experience. A Bayesian Indirect Comparison (IC) model was built to assess “global usability” ranking. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were investigated: 74 patients already instructed in DPI use and 29 naive to DPIs. IC analysis proved Ellipta as the device characterized by the highest usability, while Breezhaler the device with the lowest usability in both groups of COPD patients (both with probability > 90%). Moreover, Turbohaler ranked second according to the Bayesian pooling, followed by Diskus, Spiromax, Nexthaler, and Genuair in patients already instructed in DPI use, while the ranking order was not as much well defined in naïve patients, likely due to their too small sample. CONCLUSIONS: Usability is a multifaceted indicator that contributes to assess the factual DPIs’ convenience in real life. DPIs are characterized by different levels of real-life usability, which can be checked, compared and ranked by means of the GUS score. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6743127/ /pubmed/31528340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Dal Negro, Roberto W. Turco, Paola Povero, Massimiliano Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD |
title | Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD |
title_full | Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD |
title_fullStr | Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD |
title_short | Patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in COPD |
title_sort | patients’ usability of seven most used dry-powder inhalers in copd |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0192-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalnegrorobertow patientsusabilityofsevenmostuseddrypowderinhalersincopd AT turcopaola patientsusabilityofsevenmostuseddrypowderinhalersincopd AT poveromassimiliano patientsusabilityofsevenmostuseddrypowderinhalersincopd |