Cargando…

Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom (UK) is experiencing a general practitioner (GP) workforce retention crisis. Research has focused on investigating why GPs intend to quit, but less is known about the acceptability and effectiveness of policies and strategies to improve GP retention. Using evidence fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chilvers, Rupa, Richards, Suzanne H., Fletcher, Emily, Aylward, Alex, Dean, Sarah, Salisbury, Chris, Campbell, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31514728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1020-x
_version_ 1783451225990103040
author Chilvers, Rupa
Richards, Suzanne H.
Fletcher, Emily
Aylward, Alex
Dean, Sarah
Salisbury, Chris
Campbell, John
author_facet Chilvers, Rupa
Richards, Suzanne H.
Fletcher, Emily
Aylward, Alex
Dean, Sarah
Salisbury, Chris
Campbell, John
author_sort Chilvers, Rupa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom (UK) is experiencing a general practitioner (GP) workforce retention crisis. Research has focused on investigating why GPs intend to quit, but less is known about the acceptability and effectiveness of policies and strategies to improve GP retention. Using evidence from research and key stakeholder organisations, we generated a set of potential policies and strategies aimed at maximising GP retention and tested their appropriateness for implementation by systematically consulting with GPs. METHODS: 28 GP Partners and GPs working in national stakeholder organisations from South West England and London were purposively sampled, and asked to take part in a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method panel. Panellists were asked to read an evidence briefing summary, and then complete an online survey on two occasions. During each round, participants rated the appropriateness of policies and strategies aimed at improving GP retention using a nine point scale (1 ‘extremely inappropriate’ to 9 ‘extremely appropriate’). Fifty-four potential policies and strategies (equating to 100 statements) were tested, focusing on factors influencing job satisfaction (e.g. well-being, workload, incentives and remuneration, flexible working, human resources systems). Ratings were analysed for panel consensus and categorised based on appropriateness (‘appropriate’, ‘uncertain’, ‘inappropriate’). RESULTS: 12/28 GPs approached agreed to take part, 9/28 completed two rounds of the online survey between February and June 2018. Panellists identified 24/54 policy and strategy areas (41/100 statements) as ‘appropriate’. Examples included providing GP practices ‘at risk’ of experiencing GP shortages with a toolkit for managing recruitment and retention, and interventions to facilitate peer support to enhance health and wellbeing, or support portfolio careers. Strategies to limit GP workload, and manage patient demand were also endorsed. CONCLUSIONS: The panel of experienced GPs identified a number of practical ways to improve GP retention through interventions that might enhance job satisfaction and work-life balance. Future research should evaluate the impact of implementing these recommendations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-1020-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6743144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67431442019-09-16 Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study Chilvers, Rupa Richards, Suzanne H. Fletcher, Emily Aylward, Alex Dean, Sarah Salisbury, Chris Campbell, John BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom (UK) is experiencing a general practitioner (GP) workforce retention crisis. Research has focused on investigating why GPs intend to quit, but less is known about the acceptability and effectiveness of policies and strategies to improve GP retention. Using evidence from research and key stakeholder organisations, we generated a set of potential policies and strategies aimed at maximising GP retention and tested their appropriateness for implementation by systematically consulting with GPs. METHODS: 28 GP Partners and GPs working in national stakeholder organisations from South West England and London were purposively sampled, and asked to take part in a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method panel. Panellists were asked to read an evidence briefing summary, and then complete an online survey on two occasions. During each round, participants rated the appropriateness of policies and strategies aimed at improving GP retention using a nine point scale (1 ‘extremely inappropriate’ to 9 ‘extremely appropriate’). Fifty-four potential policies and strategies (equating to 100 statements) were tested, focusing on factors influencing job satisfaction (e.g. well-being, workload, incentives and remuneration, flexible working, human resources systems). Ratings were analysed for panel consensus and categorised based on appropriateness (‘appropriate’, ‘uncertain’, ‘inappropriate’). RESULTS: 12/28 GPs approached agreed to take part, 9/28 completed two rounds of the online survey between February and June 2018. Panellists identified 24/54 policy and strategy areas (41/100 statements) as ‘appropriate’. Examples included providing GP practices ‘at risk’ of experiencing GP shortages with a toolkit for managing recruitment and retention, and interventions to facilitate peer support to enhance health and wellbeing, or support portfolio careers. Strategies to limit GP workload, and manage patient demand were also endorsed. CONCLUSIONS: The panel of experienced GPs identified a number of practical ways to improve GP retention through interventions that might enhance job satisfaction and work-life balance. Future research should evaluate the impact of implementing these recommendations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-1020-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6743144/ /pubmed/31514728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1020-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chilvers, Rupa
Richards, Suzanne H.
Fletcher, Emily
Aylward, Alex
Dean, Sarah
Salisbury, Chris
Campbell, John
Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study
title Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study
title_full Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study
title_fullStr Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study
title_short Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study
title_sort identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the united kingdom: a rand/ucla appropriateness method panel study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31514728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1020-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chilversrupa identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy
AT richardssuzanneh identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy
AT fletcheremily identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy
AT aylwardalex identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy
AT deansarah identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy
AT salisburychris identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy
AT campbelljohn identifyingpoliciesandstrategiesforgeneralpractitionerretentionindirectpatientcareintheunitedkingdomaranduclaappropriatenessmethodpanelstudy