Cargando…

Clinical and immune profiling for cancer of unknown primary site

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) confer a survival benefit in many cancer types. Given that the survival outcome for cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains poor, we investigated the potential of CUP for immunotherapy. METHODS: A total of 164 patients with CUP (favorable subset,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haratani, Koji, Hayashi, Hidetoshi, Takahama, Takayuki, Nakamura, Yasushi, Tomida, Shuta, Yoshida, Takeshi, Chiba, Yasutaka, Sawada, Takahiro, Sakai, Kazuko, Fujita, Yoshihiko, Togashi, Yosuke, Tanizaki, Junko, Kawakami, Hisato, Ito, Akihiko, Nishio, Kazuto, Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31519206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0720-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) confer a survival benefit in many cancer types. Given that the survival outcome for cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains poor, we investigated the potential of CUP for immunotherapy. METHODS: A total of 164 patients with CUP (favorable subset, 34 patients; unfavorable subset, 130 patients) who were treated between January 2009 and March 2017 was identified from a review of medical records at Kindai University Hospital. They included 92 patients for whom pretreatment tumor tissue was available both for determination of programmed cell death–ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for immune-related gene expression profiling (irGEP). The results of irGEP for CUP were compared with published data for ICI-treated solid cancers classified into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD subsets according to their best response to ICIs. RESULTS: The median overall survival of all CUP patients was 29.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7–not reached) and 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.0–9.4) for favorable and unfavorable subsets, respectively. IHC and irGEP revealed that pretreatment immune activity—including expression of immune checkpoint molecules—for CUP was similar to that for ICI-responsive malignancies (antitumor immune cell signatures: CUP versus PD, P = 0.002–0.067; CUP versus non-PD, P = 0.591–0.999), although VEGFA expression was associated with suppression of antitumor immunity in CUP (P = 0.008, false discovery rate = 0.010). In addition, one case of CUP in the unfavorable subset that was associated with prominent PD-L1 expression on TILs and showed a durable response to nivolumab is presented. CONCLUSIONS: The survival outcome of CUP remains unsatisfactory. However, our clinical and immune profiling of CUP has revealed a potential to benefit from immunotherapy, with ICIs thus being a potential option for CUP treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0720-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.