Cargando…
Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study
BACKGROUND: Predatory journals fail to fulfill the tenets of biomedical publication: peer review, circulation, and access in perpetuity. Despite increasing attention in the lay and scientific press, no studies have directly assessed the perceptions of the authors or editors involved. OBJECTIVE: Our...
Autores principales: | Cohen, Andrew J, Patino, German, Kamal, Puneet, Ndoye, Medina, Tresh, Anas, Mena, Jorge, Butler, Christi, Washington, Samuel, Breyer, Benjamin N |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471960 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13769 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Altruistic donation to improve survey responses: a global randomized trial
por: Cohen, Andrew J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Letter to the Editor: Comment on Predatory Journals
por: Jawad, Fatema
Publicado: (2017) -
Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science
por: Sharma, H, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Predatory Journals and Perished Articles; a Letter to Editor
por: Narimani, Mashallah, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review
por: Cukier, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)