Cargando…
Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6744549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x |
_version_ | 1783451393662648320 |
---|---|
author | Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia Bokus, Barbara |
author_facet | Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia Bokus, Barbara |
author_sort | Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders, Berg en Dal, 2012). Participants were asked questions checking comprehension of the intended meaning behind an ironic comment. Four conditions were used for the ironic utterances: targeted (ironic comment was a reference to the addressee’s behavior), non-targeted (ironic comment was not a reference to the addressee’s behavior), with symmetric dyads (a child said the ironic comment to another child), and asymmetric dyads (an adult said the ironic comment to a child). All groups achieved high irony comprehension scores. The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the 4-year-olds and the 6-year-olds only. The youngest group more accurately understood ironic utterances that referred to the addressee’s action than those that did not, while older children did not show these differences. The aspect of who is speaking to whom was also significant only for the youngest children. These results provide important new insights into factors potentially influencing figurative language comprehension. Components such as participant structure and irony type require acknowledgement in the discussion on irony difficulty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6744549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67445492019-09-27 Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia Bokus, Barbara J Psycholinguist Res Article We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders, Berg en Dal, 2012). Participants were asked questions checking comprehension of the intended meaning behind an ironic comment. Four conditions were used for the ironic utterances: targeted (ironic comment was a reference to the addressee’s behavior), non-targeted (ironic comment was not a reference to the addressee’s behavior), with symmetric dyads (a child said the ironic comment to another child), and asymmetric dyads (an adult said the ironic comment to a child). All groups achieved high irony comprehension scores. The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the 4-year-olds and the 6-year-olds only. The youngest group more accurately understood ironic utterances that referred to the addressee’s action than those that did not, while older children did not show these differences. The aspect of who is speaking to whom was also significant only for the youngest children. These results provide important new insights into factors potentially influencing figurative language comprehension. Components such as participant structure and irony type require acknowledgement in the discussion on irony difficulty. Springer US 2019-07-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6744549/ /pubmed/31312955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia Bokus, Barbara Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers |
title | Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers |
title_full | Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers |
title_fullStr | Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers |
title_full_unstemmed | Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers |
title_short | Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers |
title_sort | children’s comprehension of irony: studies on polish-speaking preschoolers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6744549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banasikjemielniaknatalia childrenscomprehensionofironystudiesonpolishspeakingpreschoolers AT bokusbarbara childrenscomprehensionofironystudiesonpolishspeakingpreschoolers |