Cargando…

Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers

We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Bokus, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6744549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x
_version_ 1783451393662648320
author Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia
Bokus, Barbara
author_facet Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia
Bokus, Barbara
author_sort Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia
collection PubMed
description We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders, Berg en Dal, 2012). Participants were asked questions checking comprehension of the intended meaning behind an ironic comment. Four conditions were used for the ironic utterances: targeted (ironic comment was a reference to the addressee’s behavior), non-targeted (ironic comment was not a reference to the addressee’s behavior), with symmetric dyads (a child said the ironic comment to another child), and asymmetric dyads (an adult said the ironic comment to a child). All groups achieved high irony comprehension scores. The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the 4-year-olds and the 6-year-olds only. The youngest group more accurately understood ironic utterances that referred to the addressee’s action than those that did not, while older children did not show these differences. The aspect of who is speaking to whom was also significant only for the youngest children. These results provide important new insights into factors potentially influencing figurative language comprehension. Components such as participant structure and irony type require acknowledgement in the discussion on irony difficulty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6744549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67445492019-09-27 Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia Bokus, Barbara J Psycholinguist Res Article We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders, Berg en Dal, 2012). Participants were asked questions checking comprehension of the intended meaning behind an ironic comment. Four conditions were used for the ironic utterances: targeted (ironic comment was a reference to the addressee’s behavior), non-targeted (ironic comment was not a reference to the addressee’s behavior), with symmetric dyads (a child said the ironic comment to another child), and asymmetric dyads (an adult said the ironic comment to a child). All groups achieved high irony comprehension scores. The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the 4-year-olds and the 6-year-olds only. The youngest group more accurately understood ironic utterances that referred to the addressee’s action than those that did not, while older children did not show these differences. The aspect of who is speaking to whom was also significant only for the youngest children. These results provide important new insights into factors potentially influencing figurative language comprehension. Components such as participant structure and irony type require acknowledgement in the discussion on irony difficulty. Springer US 2019-07-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6744549/ /pubmed/31312955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia
Bokus, Barbara
Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
title Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
title_full Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
title_fullStr Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
title_full_unstemmed Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
title_short Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers
title_sort children’s comprehension of irony: studies on polish-speaking preschoolers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6744549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x
work_keys_str_mv AT banasikjemielniaknatalia childrenscomprehensionofironystudiesonpolishspeakingpreschoolers
AT bokusbarbara childrenscomprehensionofironystudiesonpolishspeakingpreschoolers