Cargando…

Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice

BACKGROUND: Updating, improving and spreading the evidence base for healthcare practices has proven to be a challenge of considerable magnitude – a wicked, multi-dimensional problem. There are many interlinked factors which determine how, why and whether any particular implementation effort or inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Augustsson, Hanna, Churruca, Kate, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6744652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31521156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4508-0
_version_ 1783451415605149696
author Augustsson, Hanna
Churruca, Kate
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Augustsson, Hanna
Churruca, Kate
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Augustsson, Hanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Updating, improving and spreading the evidence base for healthcare practices has proven to be a challenge of considerable magnitude – a wicked, multi-dimensional problem. There are many interlinked factors which determine how, why and whether any particular implementation effort or intervention succeeds. Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), strongly grounded in systems ideas and complexity science, offers a structured, yet flexible process for dealing with situations that are perceived as problematical and in need of improvement. The aim of this paper is to propose the use of SSM for managing change in healthcare by way of addressing some of the complexities. The aim is further to illustrate examples of how SSM has been used in healthcare and discuss the features of the methodology that we believe can be harnessed to improve healthcare. DISCUSSION: SSM is particularly suited for tackling real world problems that are difficult to define and where stakeholders may have divergent views on the situation and the objectives of change. SSM engages stakeholders in a learning cycle including: finding out about the problematical situation, i.e. the context in which the problem exists, by developing a rich picture of the situation; defining it by developing conceptual models and comparing these with the real world; taking action to improve it by deciding on desirable and feasible improvements; and implementing these in an iterative manner. Although SSM has been widely used in other sectors, it has not been extensively used in healthcare. We make the case for applying SSM to implementation and improvement endeavours in healthcare using the example of getting clinicians at the hospital level to use evidence-based guidelines. CONCLUSION: Applying SSM means taking account of the multi-dimensional nature of care settings, and dealing with entrenched and unique contexts, cultures and socio-political ecosystems – precisely those that manifest in healthcare. There are gains to be made in appreciating complexity and facilitating contextualization of interventions, and by approaching improvements in an iterative learning cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6744652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67446522019-09-18 Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice Augustsson, Hanna Churruca, Kate Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMC Health Serv Res Debate BACKGROUND: Updating, improving and spreading the evidence base for healthcare practices has proven to be a challenge of considerable magnitude – a wicked, multi-dimensional problem. There are many interlinked factors which determine how, why and whether any particular implementation effort or intervention succeeds. Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), strongly grounded in systems ideas and complexity science, offers a structured, yet flexible process for dealing with situations that are perceived as problematical and in need of improvement. The aim of this paper is to propose the use of SSM for managing change in healthcare by way of addressing some of the complexities. The aim is further to illustrate examples of how SSM has been used in healthcare and discuss the features of the methodology that we believe can be harnessed to improve healthcare. DISCUSSION: SSM is particularly suited for tackling real world problems that are difficult to define and where stakeholders may have divergent views on the situation and the objectives of change. SSM engages stakeholders in a learning cycle including: finding out about the problematical situation, i.e. the context in which the problem exists, by developing a rich picture of the situation; defining it by developing conceptual models and comparing these with the real world; taking action to improve it by deciding on desirable and feasible improvements; and implementing these in an iterative manner. Although SSM has been widely used in other sectors, it has not been extensively used in healthcare. We make the case for applying SSM to implementation and improvement endeavours in healthcare using the example of getting clinicians at the hospital level to use evidence-based guidelines. CONCLUSION: Applying SSM means taking account of the multi-dimensional nature of care settings, and dealing with entrenched and unique contexts, cultures and socio-political ecosystems – precisely those that manifest in healthcare. There are gains to be made in appreciating complexity and facilitating contextualization of interventions, and by approaching improvements in an iterative learning cycle. BioMed Central 2019-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6744652/ /pubmed/31521156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4508-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Augustsson, Hanna
Churruca, Kate
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
title Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
title_full Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
title_fullStr Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
title_full_unstemmed Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
title_short Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
title_sort re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6744652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31521156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4508-0
work_keys_str_mv AT augustssonhanna reenergisingthewaywemanagechangeinhealthcarethecaseforsoftsystemsmethodologyanditsapplicationtoevidencebasedpractice
AT churrucakate reenergisingthewaywemanagechangeinhealthcarethecaseforsoftsystemsmethodologyanditsapplicationtoevidencebasedpractice
AT braithwaitejeffrey reenergisingthewaywemanagechangeinhealthcarethecaseforsoftsystemsmethodologyanditsapplicationtoevidencebasedpractice