Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer Patients with Germline DNA Repair Mutations: Retrospective Analysis from an International Study

BACKGROUND: Germline DNA damage repair gene mutation (gDDRm) is found in >10% of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Their prognostic and predictive impact relating to standard therapies is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gDDRm status impacts benefit from established therapies in mPC. DESI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mateo, Joaquin, Cheng, Heather H., Beltran, Himisha, Dolling, David, Xu, Wen, Pritchard, Colin C., Mossop, Helen, Rescigno, Pasquale, Perez-Lopez, Raquel, Sailer, Verena, Kolinsky, Michael, Balasopoulou, Ada, Bertan, Claudia, Nanus, David M., Tagawa, Scott T., Thorne, Heather, Montgomery, Bruce, Carreira, Suzanne, Sandhu, Shahneen, Rubin, Mark A., Nelson, Peter S., de Bono, Johann S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.010
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Germline DNA damage repair gene mutation (gDDRm) is found in >10% of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Their prognostic and predictive impact relating to standard therapies is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gDDRm status impacts benefit from established therapies in mPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective, international, observational study. Medical records were reviewed for 390 mPC patients with known gDDRm status. All 372 patients from Royal Marsden (UK), Weill-Cornell (NY), and University of Washington (WA) were previously included in a prevalence study (Pritchard, NEJM 2016); the remaining 18 were gBRCA1/2m carriers, from the kConFab consortium, Australia. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data were collected. To account for potential differences between cohorts, a mixed-effect model (Weibull distribution) with random intercept per cohort was used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The gDDRm status was known for all 390 patients (60 carriers of gDDRm [gDDRm +], including 37 gBRCA2m, and 330 cases not found to carry gDDRm [gDDRm–]); 74% and 69% were treated with docetaxel and abiraterone/enzalutamide, respectively, and 36% received PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum. Median OS from castration resistance was similar among groups (3.2vs 3.0 yr, p = 0.73). Median docetaxel PFS for gDDRm+ (6.8 mo) was not significantly different from that for gDDRm- (5.1 mo), and RRs were similar (gDDRm+ = 61%; gDDRm- = 54%). There were no significant differences in median PFS and RR on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide (gDDRm+ = 8.3 mo, gDDRm- = 8.3 mo; gDDRm+ = 46%, gDDRm- = 56%). Interaction test for PARPi/platinum and gDDRm+ resulted in an OS adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.28–1.25; p = 0.17). Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: mPC patients with gDDRm appeared to benefit from standard therapies similarly to the overall population; prospective studies are ongoing to investigate the impact of PARPi/platinum. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with inherited DNA repair mutations benefit from standard therapies similarly to other metastatic prostate cancer patients.