Cargando…

Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy

BACKROUND: Capsule colonoscopy might present an alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening. AIM: To assess the accuracy of second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CCE2) for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). METHODS: From 2011–2015, we perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voska, Michal, Zavoral, Miroslav, Grega, Tomas, Majek, Ondrej, Martinek, Jan, Tacheci, Ilja, Benes, Marek, Vojtechova, Gabriela, Drastich, Pavel, Bures, Jan, Spicak, Julius, Buckova, Barbora, Ngo, Ondrej, Suchanek, Stepan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438
_version_ 1783451495146979328
author Voska, Michal
Zavoral, Miroslav
Grega, Tomas
Majek, Ondrej
Martinek, Jan
Tacheci, Ilja
Benes, Marek
Vojtechova, Gabriela
Drastich, Pavel
Bures, Jan
Spicak, Julius
Buckova, Barbora
Ngo, Ondrej
Suchanek, Stepan
author_facet Voska, Michal
Zavoral, Miroslav
Grega, Tomas
Majek, Ondrej
Martinek, Jan
Tacheci, Ilja
Benes, Marek
Vojtechova, Gabriela
Drastich, Pavel
Bures, Jan
Spicak, Julius
Buckova, Barbora
Ngo, Ondrej
Suchanek, Stepan
author_sort Voska, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKROUND: Capsule colonoscopy might present an alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening. AIM: To assess the accuracy of second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CCE2) for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). METHODS: From 2011–2015, we performed a multicenter, prospective, cross-over study evaluating the use of CCE2 as a possible colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test based on the assessment of the method's characteristics (accuracy) and safety and patient acceptance of the routine. Enrolled participants fulfilled the CRC screening population criteria if they were asymptomatic, were older than 50, and had no personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was accuracy for the detection of polyps ≥ 6 mm. Secondary outcomes were accuracy for all polyps, polyps ≥ 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, and cancers, the quality of bowel cleansing, safety, and CCE2 acceptability by the screening population. RESULTS: A total of 236 individuals were examined; 11 patients (5%) were excluded. Therefore, 225 subjects (95%) were considered in the intention-to-screen (ITS) group. A total of 201 patients (89%) completed both examinations successfully (per protocol group). In the ITS group, polyps were diagnosed during CC in 114 subjects (51%); polyps ≥ 6 mm, polyps ≥ 10 mm, and adenomas ≥ 10 mm were diagnosed in 34 (15%), 16 (7%), and 11 (5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity of CCE2 for polyps ≥ 6 mm, polyps ≥ 10 mm, and adenomas ≥ 10 mm was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62–91%), 88% (95% CI: 62–98%), and 100% (95% CI: 72–100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Second-generation capsule colonoscopy is a safe, noninvasive, and sensitive method for colorectal neoplasia detection although CC remains the preferred method for considerable proportion of subjects. CCE2 may therefore be accepted as the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6745144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67451442019-09-29 Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy Voska, Michal Zavoral, Miroslav Grega, Tomas Majek, Ondrej Martinek, Jan Tacheci, Ilja Benes, Marek Vojtechova, Gabriela Drastich, Pavel Bures, Jan Spicak, Julius Buckova, Barbora Ngo, Ondrej Suchanek, Stepan Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKROUND: Capsule colonoscopy might present an alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening. AIM: To assess the accuracy of second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CCE2) for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). METHODS: From 2011–2015, we performed a multicenter, prospective, cross-over study evaluating the use of CCE2 as a possible colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test based on the assessment of the method's characteristics (accuracy) and safety and patient acceptance of the routine. Enrolled participants fulfilled the CRC screening population criteria if they were asymptomatic, were older than 50, and had no personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was accuracy for the detection of polyps ≥ 6 mm. Secondary outcomes were accuracy for all polyps, polyps ≥ 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, and cancers, the quality of bowel cleansing, safety, and CCE2 acceptability by the screening population. RESULTS: A total of 236 individuals were examined; 11 patients (5%) were excluded. Therefore, 225 subjects (95%) were considered in the intention-to-screen (ITS) group. A total of 201 patients (89%) completed both examinations successfully (per protocol group). In the ITS group, polyps were diagnosed during CC in 114 subjects (51%); polyps ≥ 6 mm, polyps ≥ 10 mm, and adenomas ≥ 10 mm were diagnosed in 34 (15%), 16 (7%), and 11 (5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity of CCE2 for polyps ≥ 6 mm, polyps ≥ 10 mm, and adenomas ≥ 10 mm was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62–91%), 88% (95% CI: 62–98%), and 100% (95% CI: 72–100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Second-generation capsule colonoscopy is a safe, noninvasive, and sensitive method for colorectal neoplasia detection although CC remains the preferred method for considerable proportion of subjects. CCE2 may therefore be accepted as the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening. Hindawi 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6745144/ /pubmed/31565052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438 Text en Copyright © 2019 Michal Voska et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Voska, Michal
Zavoral, Miroslav
Grega, Tomas
Majek, Ondrej
Martinek, Jan
Tacheci, Ilja
Benes, Marek
Vojtechova, Gabriela
Drastich, Pavel
Bures, Jan
Spicak, Julius
Buckova, Barbora
Ngo, Ondrej
Suchanek, Stepan
Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
title Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
title_full Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
title_fullStr Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
title_short Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
title_sort accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for colorectal neoplasia detection in individuals referred for a screening colonoscopy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438
work_keys_str_mv AT voskamichal accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT zavoralmiroslav accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT gregatomas accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT majekondrej accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT martinekjan accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT tacheciilja accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT benesmarek accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT vojtechovagabriela accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT drastichpavel accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT buresjan accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT spicakjulius accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT buckovabarbora accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT ngoondrej accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy
AT suchanekstepan accuracyofcoloncapsuleendoscopyforcolorectalneoplasiadetectioninindividualsreferredforascreeningcolonoscopy