Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver

The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and survival following hepatic artery embolization (HAE) for metastatic solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) in the liver. All patients with SFT metastatic to liver treated with HAE were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was evaluated using mRECIST. Object...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velayati, Sara, Erinjeri, Joseph P., Brody, Lynn A., Ziv, Etay, Boas, Franz E., Brown, Karen T., Covey, Anne M., Getrajdman, George I., Solomon, Stephen B., Kingham, Peter T., Tap, William D., Jarnagin, William R., Yarmohammadi, Hooman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3060658
_version_ 1783451499983011840
author Velayati, Sara
Erinjeri, Joseph P.
Brody, Lynn A.
Ziv, Etay
Boas, Franz E.
Brown, Karen T.
Covey, Anne M.
Getrajdman, George I.
Solomon, Stephen B.
Kingham, Peter T.
Tap, William D.
Jarnagin, William R.
Yarmohammadi, Hooman
author_facet Velayati, Sara
Erinjeri, Joseph P.
Brody, Lynn A.
Ziv, Etay
Boas, Franz E.
Brown, Karen T.
Covey, Anne M.
Getrajdman, George I.
Solomon, Stephen B.
Kingham, Peter T.
Tap, William D.
Jarnagin, William R.
Yarmohammadi, Hooman
author_sort Velayati, Sara
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and survival following hepatic artery embolization (HAE) for metastatic solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) in the liver. All patients with SFT metastatic to liver treated with HAE were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was evaluated using mRECIST. Objective response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Twelve patients (6 males and 6 females, mean age: 42.5 ± 13 years; 24–65) were treated with 33 embolizations. Anatomical sites of origin for SFT were the head and neck (n = 6; 50%), pelvis (n = 2), pleura (n = 2), retroperitoneal (n = 1), and thigh (n = 1). The median follow-up from first HAE was 4.5 years (3–7.9). 84% of the patients showed objective response [42% complete response (CR) plus 42% partial response (PR)] to HAE by mRECIST (95% CI, 60–99%). Patients with CR to HAE had significantly higher OS compared to others (p < 0.02). The postembolization median OS was 4 years (95% CI, 2.3–5.2), and mean PFS, for intra- or extrahepatic progression of disease, was 6 months (95%, CI, 3.2–7.1). One patient developed pneumonia/sepsis and died 27 days postembolization, possibly not directly related to embolization. No grade III or IV adverse events were identified in the remaining patients. In conclusion, HAE for metastatic liver SFT is a relatively safe treatment option with high response rate and should be considered as a treatment option for metastatic liver SFT. In our cohort of patients with metastatic SFT to the liver, we observed a median OS of 4 years following HAE. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of HAE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6745165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67451652019-09-29 Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver Velayati, Sara Erinjeri, Joseph P. Brody, Lynn A. Ziv, Etay Boas, Franz E. Brown, Karen T. Covey, Anne M. Getrajdman, George I. Solomon, Stephen B. Kingham, Peter T. Tap, William D. Jarnagin, William R. Yarmohammadi, Hooman Sarcoma Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and survival following hepatic artery embolization (HAE) for metastatic solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) in the liver. All patients with SFT metastatic to liver treated with HAE were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was evaluated using mRECIST. Objective response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Twelve patients (6 males and 6 females, mean age: 42.5 ± 13 years; 24–65) were treated with 33 embolizations. Anatomical sites of origin for SFT were the head and neck (n = 6; 50%), pelvis (n = 2), pleura (n = 2), retroperitoneal (n = 1), and thigh (n = 1). The median follow-up from first HAE was 4.5 years (3–7.9). 84% of the patients showed objective response [42% complete response (CR) plus 42% partial response (PR)] to HAE by mRECIST (95% CI, 60–99%). Patients with CR to HAE had significantly higher OS compared to others (p < 0.02). The postembolization median OS was 4 years (95% CI, 2.3–5.2), and mean PFS, for intra- or extrahepatic progression of disease, was 6 months (95%, CI, 3.2–7.1). One patient developed pneumonia/sepsis and died 27 days postembolization, possibly not directly related to embolization. No grade III or IV adverse events were identified in the remaining patients. In conclusion, HAE for metastatic liver SFT is a relatively safe treatment option with high response rate and should be considered as a treatment option for metastatic liver SFT. In our cohort of patients with metastatic SFT to the liver, we observed a median OS of 4 years following HAE. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of HAE. Hindawi 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6745165/ /pubmed/31565028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3060658 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sara Velayati et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Velayati, Sara
Erinjeri, Joseph P.
Brody, Lynn A.
Ziv, Etay
Boas, Franz E.
Brown, Karen T.
Covey, Anne M.
Getrajdman, George I.
Solomon, Stephen B.
Kingham, Peter T.
Tap, William D.
Jarnagin, William R.
Yarmohammadi, Hooman
Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver
title Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Treating Solitary Fibrous Tumor Metastatic to the Liver
title_sort safety and efficacy of hepatic artery embolization in treating solitary fibrous tumor metastatic to the liver
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3060658
work_keys_str_mv AT velayatisara safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT erinjerijosephp safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT brodylynna safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT zivetay safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT boasfranze safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT brownkarent safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT coveyannem safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT getrajdmangeorgei safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT solomonstephenb safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT kinghampetert safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT tapwilliamd safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT jarnaginwilliamr safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver
AT yarmohammadihooman safetyandefficacyofhepaticarteryembolizationintreatingsolitaryfibroustumormetastatictotheliver