Cargando…

Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study

BACKGROUND: In their research reports, scientists are expected to discuss limitations that their studies have. Previous research showed that often, such discussion is absent. Also, many journals emphasize the importance of avoiding overstatement of claims. We wanted to see to what extent editorial h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Keserlioglu, Kerem, Kilicoglu, Halil, ter Riet, Gerben
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0078-2

Ejemplares similares

Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Is the future of peer review automated?
por: Schulz, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A large scale randomized controlled trial on herding in peer-review discussions
por: Stelmakh, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effectiveness of sensor monitoring in an occupational therapy rehabilitation program for older individuals after hip fracture, the SO-HIP trial: study protocol of a three-arm stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
por: Pol, Margriet C., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Peer Review of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”
por: Chan, Eric C
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”
por: Soares Teles, Ariel
Publicado: (2022)

Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion
por: Shiffrin, Richard M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cost-Effectiveness of Cranberries vs Antibiotics to Prevent Urinary Tract Infections in Premenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial
por: Bosmans, Judith E., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Bias associated with delayed verification in test accuracy studies: accuracy of tests for endometrial hyperplasia may be much higher than we think!
por: Clark, T Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Physical activity and risk of comorbidities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cohort study
por: Yu, Tsung, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
por: van der Mark, Lonneke B, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks”
por: Leung, Tiffany I, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prediction of long-term clinical outcomes using simple functional exercise performance tests in patients with COPD: a 5-year prospective cohort study
por: Crook, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Characteristics of Dutch and Swiss primary care COPD patients – baseline data of the ICE COLD ERIC study
por: Siebeling, Lara, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Effects of Nurse-Led Multifactorial Care to Prevent Disability in Community-Living Older People: Cluster Randomized Trial
por: Suijker, Jacqueline J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour: systematic review
por: Bachmann, Lucas M, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Assessing Primary Care Physicians’ Beliefs and Attitudes of Asthma Exacerbation Treatment and Follow-Up
por: Loymans, Rik, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Women with symptoms of uncomplicated urinary tract infection are often willing to delay antibiotic treatment: a prospective cohort study
por: Knottnerus, Bart J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Epidemiology of frequent attenders: a 3-year historic cohort study comparing attendance, morbidity and prescriptions of one-year and persistent frequent attenders
por: Smits, Frans ThM, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

The effect of a pharmacy-led transitional care program on medication-related problems post-discharge: A before—After prospective study
por: Daliri, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Discussion on Iodism before the French Academy
por: Velpeau, M.
Publicado: (1860)

Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review
por: Sandewall, Erik
Publicado: (2012)

All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies
por: ter Riet, Gerben, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The strengths and limitations of routine staging before treatment with abdominal CT in colorectal cancer
por: Grossmann, Irene, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: a linguistically motivated perspective
por: Kilicoglu, Halil, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Biological event composition
por: Kilicoglu, Halil, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The Strength of Physiological Reports and Peer Review
por: Wray, Susan
Publicado: (2017)

Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
por: Linde, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2001)

Quantitative benefit–harm assessment for setting research priorities: the example of roflumilast for patients with COPD
por: Puhan, Milo A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Honorary authorship in health sciences: a protocol for a systematic review of survey research
por: Meursinge Reynders, Reint, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
por: Patel, Jigisha
Publicado: (2014)

Cluster randomized controlled trial of a peer support program for people with diabetes: study protocol for the Australasian peers for progress study
por: Riddell, Michaela A, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
por: Haven, Tamarinde L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Asthma control cost-utility randomized trial evaluation (ACCURATE): the goals of asthma treatment
por: Honkoop, Persijn J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_9upnh2gf5580v0gf8jk91r8jog