Cargando…

BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results

BACKGROUND: The accurate evaluation of BRAF(V600E) mutation in preoperative fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens is important for making management decisions in thyroid nodules (TNs). The aim of this study was to assess the false‐positive and false‐negative BRAF(V600E) mutations in thyro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Chong‐Ke, Zheng, Jia‐Yi, Sun, Li‐Ping, Xu, Rong‐Ying, Wei, Qing, Xu, Hui‐Xiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31397092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2478
_version_ 1783451602896551936
author Zhao, Chong‐Ke
Zheng, Jia‐Yi
Sun, Li‐Ping
Xu, Rong‐Ying
Wei, Qing
Xu, Hui‐Xiong
author_facet Zhao, Chong‐Ke
Zheng, Jia‐Yi
Sun, Li‐Ping
Xu, Rong‐Ying
Wei, Qing
Xu, Hui‐Xiong
author_sort Zhao, Chong‐Ke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accurate evaluation of BRAF(V600E) mutation in preoperative fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens is important for making management decisions in thyroid nodules (TNs). The aim of this study was to assess the false‐positive and false‐negative BRAF(V600E) mutations in thyroid FNAC specimens and their influence on diagnosis of TN. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 292 nodules in 269 patients who underwent BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis using amplification refractory mutation system‐quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (ARMS‐qPCR) both in FNAC specimens and formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue samples after surgery. The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF(V600E) analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were recorded, with reference to the results of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FFPE tissue sample. Diagnostic performances of FNAC, BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FNAC specimens, BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample, and the combination of FNAC and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis for predicting thyroid malignancy were assessed. RESULTS: The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF(V600E) analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were 10.1% (19/189) and 7.1% (7/98), respectively. FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis significantly increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 75.7% to 92.3%, and accuracy from 78.7% to 90.6% in comparison with FNAC alone (both P < .001). No significant differences were found between the combination of FNAC and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FNAC specimens and the combination of FNAC and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample (sensitivity: 92.3% vs 91.9%; accuracy: 90.6% vs 91.3%; both P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis can significantly increase the diagnostic performance in comparison with FNAC alone. False‐positive and false‐negative BRAF(V600E) mutation results are found in preoperative FNAC specimens, whereas it does not affect the overall auxiliary diagnosis of TNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6745841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67458412019-09-18 BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results Zhao, Chong‐Ke Zheng, Jia‐Yi Sun, Li‐Ping Xu, Rong‐Ying Wei, Qing Xu, Hui‐Xiong Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The accurate evaluation of BRAF(V600E) mutation in preoperative fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens is important for making management decisions in thyroid nodules (TNs). The aim of this study was to assess the false‐positive and false‐negative BRAF(V600E) mutations in thyroid FNAC specimens and their influence on diagnosis of TN. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 292 nodules in 269 patients who underwent BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis using amplification refractory mutation system‐quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (ARMS‐qPCR) both in FNAC specimens and formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue samples after surgery. The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF(V600E) analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were recorded, with reference to the results of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FFPE tissue sample. Diagnostic performances of FNAC, BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FNAC specimens, BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample, and the combination of FNAC and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis for predicting thyroid malignancy were assessed. RESULTS: The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF(V600E) analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were 10.1% (19/189) and 7.1% (7/98), respectively. FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis significantly increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 75.7% to 92.3%, and accuracy from 78.7% to 90.6% in comparison with FNAC alone (both P < .001). No significant differences were found between the combination of FNAC and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FNAC specimens and the combination of FNAC and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample (sensitivity: 92.3% vs 91.9%; accuracy: 90.6% vs 91.3%; both P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis can significantly increase the diagnostic performance in comparison with FNAC alone. False‐positive and false‐negative BRAF(V600E) mutation results are found in preoperative FNAC specimens, whereas it does not affect the overall auxiliary diagnosis of TNs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6745841/ /pubmed/31397092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2478 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Zhao, Chong‐Ke
Zheng, Jia‐Yi
Sun, Li‐Ping
Xu, Rong‐Ying
Wei, Qing
Xu, Hui‐Xiong
BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
title BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
title_full BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
title_fullStr BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
title_full_unstemmed BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
title_short BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
title_sort braf(v600e) mutation analysis in fine‐needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: the influence of false‐positive and false‐negative results
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31397092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2478
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaochongke brafv600emutationanalysisinfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimensfordiagnosisofthyroidnodulestheinfluenceoffalsepositiveandfalsenegativeresults
AT zhengjiayi brafv600emutationanalysisinfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimensfordiagnosisofthyroidnodulestheinfluenceoffalsepositiveandfalsenegativeresults
AT sunliping brafv600emutationanalysisinfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimensfordiagnosisofthyroidnodulestheinfluenceoffalsepositiveandfalsenegativeresults
AT xurongying brafv600emutationanalysisinfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimensfordiagnosisofthyroidnodulestheinfluenceoffalsepositiveandfalsenegativeresults
AT weiqing brafv600emutationanalysisinfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimensfordiagnosisofthyroidnodulestheinfluenceoffalsepositiveandfalsenegativeresults
AT xuhuixiong brafv600emutationanalysisinfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimensfordiagnosisofthyroidnodulestheinfluenceoffalsepositiveandfalsenegativeresults