Cargando…

Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017

A recently published review of 45 studies concluded that approximately half of individuals who sustain a single mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) experience long-term cognitive impairment (McInnes et al. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review. PLoS ONE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iverson, Grant L., Karr, Justin E., Gardner, Andrew J., Silverberg, Noah D., Terry, Douglas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31525205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218997
_version_ 1783451701002371072
author Iverson, Grant L.
Karr, Justin E.
Gardner, Andrew J.
Silverberg, Noah D.
Terry, Douglas P.
author_facet Iverson, Grant L.
Karr, Justin E.
Gardner, Andrew J.
Silverberg, Noah D.
Terry, Douglas P.
author_sort Iverson, Grant L.
collection PubMed
description A recently published review of 45 studies concluded that approximately half of individuals who sustain a single mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) experience long-term cognitive impairment (McInnes et al. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0174847). Stratified by age, they reported that 50% of children and 58% of adults showed some form of cognitive impairment. We contend that the McInnes et al. review used a definition of “cognitive impairment” that was idiosyncratic, not applicable to individual patients or subjects, inconsistent with how cognitive impairment is defined in clinical practice and research, and resulted in a large number of false positive cases of cognitive impairment. For example, if a study reported a statistically significant difference on a single cognitive test, the authors concluded that every subject with a MTBI in that study was cognitively impaired–an approach that cannot be justified statistically or psychometrically. The authors concluded that impairment was present in various cognitive domains, such as attention, memory, and executive functioning, but they did not analyze or report the results from any of these specific cognitive domains. Moreover, their analyses and conclusions regarding many published studies contradicted the interpretations provided by the original authors of those studies. We re-reviewed all 45 studies and extracted the main conclusions from each. We conclude that a single MTBI is not associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6746392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67463922019-09-27 Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017 Iverson, Grant L. Karr, Justin E. Gardner, Andrew J. Silverberg, Noah D. Terry, Douglas P. PLoS One Formal Comment A recently published review of 45 studies concluded that approximately half of individuals who sustain a single mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) experience long-term cognitive impairment (McInnes et al. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0174847). Stratified by age, they reported that 50% of children and 58% of adults showed some form of cognitive impairment. We contend that the McInnes et al. review used a definition of “cognitive impairment” that was idiosyncratic, not applicable to individual patients or subjects, inconsistent with how cognitive impairment is defined in clinical practice and research, and resulted in a large number of false positive cases of cognitive impairment. For example, if a study reported a statistically significant difference on a single cognitive test, the authors concluded that every subject with a MTBI in that study was cognitively impaired–an approach that cannot be justified statistically or psychometrically. The authors concluded that impairment was present in various cognitive domains, such as attention, memory, and executive functioning, but they did not analyze or report the results from any of these specific cognitive domains. Moreover, their analyses and conclusions regarding many published studies contradicted the interpretations provided by the original authors of those studies. We re-reviewed all 45 studies and extracted the main conclusions from each. We conclude that a single MTBI is not associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment. Public Library of Science 2019-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6746392/ /pubmed/31525205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218997 Text en © 2019 Iverson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Formal Comment
Iverson, Grant L.
Karr, Justin E.
Gardner, Andrew J.
Silverberg, Noah D.
Terry, Douglas P.
Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017
title Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017
title_full Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017
title_fullStr Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017
title_full_unstemmed Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017
title_short Results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: Commentary on McInnes et al. 2017
title_sort results of scoping review do not support mild traumatic brain injury being associated with a high incidence of chronic cognitive impairment: commentary on mcinnes et al. 2017
topic Formal Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31525205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218997
work_keys_str_mv AT iversongrantl resultsofscopingreviewdonotsupportmildtraumaticbraininjurybeingassociatedwithahighincidenceofchroniccognitiveimpairmentcommentaryonmcinnesetal2017
AT karrjustine resultsofscopingreviewdonotsupportmildtraumaticbraininjurybeingassociatedwithahighincidenceofchroniccognitiveimpairmentcommentaryonmcinnesetal2017
AT gardnerandrewj resultsofscopingreviewdonotsupportmildtraumaticbraininjurybeingassociatedwithahighincidenceofchroniccognitiveimpairmentcommentaryonmcinnesetal2017
AT silverbergnoahd resultsofscopingreviewdonotsupportmildtraumaticbraininjurybeingassociatedwithahighincidenceofchroniccognitiveimpairmentcommentaryonmcinnesetal2017
AT terrydouglasp resultsofscopingreviewdonotsupportmildtraumaticbraininjurybeingassociatedwithahighincidenceofchroniccognitiveimpairmentcommentaryonmcinnesetal2017