Cargando…
Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil
Ruminant urine patches on grazed grassland are a significant source of agricultural nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions. Of the many biotic and abiotic N(2)O production mechanisms initiated following urine-urea deposition, codenitrification resulting in the formation of hybrid N(2)O, is one of the least...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49989-y |
_version_ | 1783451745638154240 |
---|---|
author | Rex, David Clough, Timothy J. Richards, Karl G. Condron, Leo M. de Klein, Cecile A. M. Morales, Sergio E. Lanigan, Gary J. |
author_facet | Rex, David Clough, Timothy J. Richards, Karl G. Condron, Leo M. de Klein, Cecile A. M. Morales, Sergio E. Lanigan, Gary J. |
author_sort | Rex, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ruminant urine patches on grazed grassland are a significant source of agricultural nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions. Of the many biotic and abiotic N(2)O production mechanisms initiated following urine-urea deposition, codenitrification resulting in the formation of hybrid N(2)O, is one of the least understood. Codenitrification forms hybrid N(2)O via biotic N-nitrosation, co-metabolising organic and inorganic N compounds (N substrates) to produce N(2)O. The objective of this study was to assess the relative significance of different N substrates on codenitrification and to determine the contributions of fungi and bacteria to codenitrification. (15)N-labelled ammonium, hydroxylamine (NH(2)OH) and two amino acids (phenylalanine or glycine) were applied, separately, to sieved soil mesocosms eight days after a simulated urine event, in the absence or presence of bacterial and fungal inhibitors. Soil chemical variables and N(2)O fluxes were monitored and the codenitrified N(2)O fluxes determined. Fungal inhibition decreased N(2)O fluxes by ca. 40% for both amino acid treatments, while bacterial inhibition only decreased the N(2)O flux of the glycine treatment, by 14%. Hydroxylamine (NH(2)OH) generated the highest N(2)O fluxes which declined with either fungal or bacterial inhibition alone, while combined inhibition resulted in a 60% decrease in the N(2)O flux. All the N substrates examined participated to some extent in codenitrification. Trends for codenitrification under the NH(2)OH substrate treatment followed those of total N(2)O fluxes (85.7% of total N(2)O flux). Codenitrification fluxes under non-NH(2)OH substrate treatments (0.7–1.2% of total N(2)O flux) were two orders of magnitude lower, and significant decreases in these treatments only occurred with fungal inhibition in the amino acid substrate treatments. These results demonstrate that in situ studies are required to better understand the dynamics of codenitrification substrates in grazed pasture soils and the associated role that fungi have with respect to codenitrification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6746759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67467592019-09-27 Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil Rex, David Clough, Timothy J. Richards, Karl G. Condron, Leo M. de Klein, Cecile A. M. Morales, Sergio E. Lanigan, Gary J. Sci Rep Article Ruminant urine patches on grazed grassland are a significant source of agricultural nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions. Of the many biotic and abiotic N(2)O production mechanisms initiated following urine-urea deposition, codenitrification resulting in the formation of hybrid N(2)O, is one of the least understood. Codenitrification forms hybrid N(2)O via biotic N-nitrosation, co-metabolising organic and inorganic N compounds (N substrates) to produce N(2)O. The objective of this study was to assess the relative significance of different N substrates on codenitrification and to determine the contributions of fungi and bacteria to codenitrification. (15)N-labelled ammonium, hydroxylamine (NH(2)OH) and two amino acids (phenylalanine or glycine) were applied, separately, to sieved soil mesocosms eight days after a simulated urine event, in the absence or presence of bacterial and fungal inhibitors. Soil chemical variables and N(2)O fluxes were monitored and the codenitrified N(2)O fluxes determined. Fungal inhibition decreased N(2)O fluxes by ca. 40% for both amino acid treatments, while bacterial inhibition only decreased the N(2)O flux of the glycine treatment, by 14%. Hydroxylamine (NH(2)OH) generated the highest N(2)O fluxes which declined with either fungal or bacterial inhibition alone, while combined inhibition resulted in a 60% decrease in the N(2)O flux. All the N substrates examined participated to some extent in codenitrification. Trends for codenitrification under the NH(2)OH substrate treatment followed those of total N(2)O fluxes (85.7% of total N(2)O flux). Codenitrification fluxes under non-NH(2)OH substrate treatments (0.7–1.2% of total N(2)O flux) were two orders of magnitude lower, and significant decreases in these treatments only occurred with fungal inhibition in the amino acid substrate treatments. These results demonstrate that in situ studies are required to better understand the dynamics of codenitrification substrates in grazed pasture soils and the associated role that fungi have with respect to codenitrification. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6746759/ /pubmed/31527802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49989-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rex, David Clough, Timothy J. Richards, Karl G. Condron, Leo M. de Klein, Cecile A. M. Morales, Sergio E. Lanigan, Gary J. Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
title | Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
title_full | Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
title_fullStr | Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
title_short | Impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
title_sort | impact of nitrogen compounds on fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification in a pasture soil |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49989-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rexdavid impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil AT cloughtimothyj impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil AT richardskarlg impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil AT condronleom impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil AT dekleincecileam impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil AT moralessergioe impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil AT lanigangaryj impactofnitrogencompoundsonfungalandbacterialcontributionstocodenitrificationinapasturesoil |