Cargando…
Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00044 |
_version_ | 1783451790385086464 |
---|---|
author | Reynolds, Joshua A. Henwood, Melissa K. Turtle, Joel D. Baine, Rachel E. Johnston, David T. Grau, James W. |
author_facet | Reynolds, Joshua A. Henwood, Melissa K. Turtle, Joel D. Baine, Rachel E. Johnston, David T. Grau, James W. |
author_sort | Reynolds, Joshua A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury, allowing blood to infiltrate the tissue. The present study examined whether these effects impact tissue rostral and caudal to the site of injury. In addition, the study evaluated whether cutting communication with the brain, by means of a rostral transection, affects the development of hemorrhage. Eighteen hours after rats received a lower thoracic (T11–12) contusion injury, half underwent a spinal transection at T2. Noxious electrical stimulation (shock) was applied 6 h later. Cellular assays showed that, in non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased hemoglobin content, activated pro-inflammatory cytokines and engaged signals related to cell death at the site of injury. These effects were not observed in transected animals. In the next experiment, the spinal transection was performed at the time of contusion injury. Nociceptive stimulation was applied 24 h later and tissue was sectioned for microscopy. In non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased the area of hemorrhage and this effect was blocked by spinal transection. These findings imply that the adverse effect of noxious stimulation depends upon spared ascending fibers and the activation of rostral (brain) systems. If true, stimulation should induce less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury that blocks transmission to the brain. To test this, rats were given a mild, moderate, or severe, injury and electrical stimulation was applied 24 h later. Histological analyses of longitudinal sections showed that nociceptive stimulation triggered less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury. The results suggest that brain-dependent processes drive pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury (SCI). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6746957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67469572019-09-24 Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury Reynolds, Joshua A. Henwood, Melissa K. Turtle, Joel D. Baine, Rachel E. Johnston, David T. Grau, James W. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury, allowing blood to infiltrate the tissue. The present study examined whether these effects impact tissue rostral and caudal to the site of injury. In addition, the study evaluated whether cutting communication with the brain, by means of a rostral transection, affects the development of hemorrhage. Eighteen hours after rats received a lower thoracic (T11–12) contusion injury, half underwent a spinal transection at T2. Noxious electrical stimulation (shock) was applied 6 h later. Cellular assays showed that, in non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased hemoglobin content, activated pro-inflammatory cytokines and engaged signals related to cell death at the site of injury. These effects were not observed in transected animals. In the next experiment, the spinal transection was performed at the time of contusion injury. Nociceptive stimulation was applied 24 h later and tissue was sectioned for microscopy. In non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased the area of hemorrhage and this effect was blocked by spinal transection. These findings imply that the adverse effect of noxious stimulation depends upon spared ascending fibers and the activation of rostral (brain) systems. If true, stimulation should induce less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury that blocks transmission to the brain. To test this, rats were given a mild, moderate, or severe, injury and electrical stimulation was applied 24 h later. Histological analyses of longitudinal sections showed that nociceptive stimulation triggered less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury. The results suggest that brain-dependent processes drive pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury (SCI). Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6746957/ /pubmed/31551720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00044 Text en Copyright © 2019 Reynolds, Henwood, Turtle, Baine, Johnston and Grau. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Reynolds, Joshua A. Henwood, Melissa K. Turtle, Joel D. Baine, Rachel E. Johnston, David T. Grau, James W. Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury |
title | Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury |
title_full | Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury |
title_fullStr | Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury |
title_short | Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury |
title_sort | brain-dependent processes fuel pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynoldsjoshuaa braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury AT henwoodmelissak braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury AT turtlejoeld braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury AT bainerachele braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury AT johnstondavidt braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury AT graujamesw braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury |