Cargando…

Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury

Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Joshua A., Henwood, Melissa K., Turtle, Joel D., Baine, Rachel E., Johnston, David T., Grau, James W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00044
_version_ 1783451790385086464
author Reynolds, Joshua A.
Henwood, Melissa K.
Turtle, Joel D.
Baine, Rachel E.
Johnston, David T.
Grau, James W.
author_facet Reynolds, Joshua A.
Henwood, Melissa K.
Turtle, Joel D.
Baine, Rachel E.
Johnston, David T.
Grau, James W.
author_sort Reynolds, Joshua A.
collection PubMed
description Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury, allowing blood to infiltrate the tissue. The present study examined whether these effects impact tissue rostral and caudal to the site of injury. In addition, the study evaluated whether cutting communication with the brain, by means of a rostral transection, affects the development of hemorrhage. Eighteen hours after rats received a lower thoracic (T11–12) contusion injury, half underwent a spinal transection at T2. Noxious electrical stimulation (shock) was applied 6 h later. Cellular assays showed that, in non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased hemoglobin content, activated pro-inflammatory cytokines and engaged signals related to cell death at the site of injury. These effects were not observed in transected animals. In the next experiment, the spinal transection was performed at the time of contusion injury. Nociceptive stimulation was applied 24 h later and tissue was sectioned for microscopy. In non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased the area of hemorrhage and this effect was blocked by spinal transection. These findings imply that the adverse effect of noxious stimulation depends upon spared ascending fibers and the activation of rostral (brain) systems. If true, stimulation should induce less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury that blocks transmission to the brain. To test this, rats were given a mild, moderate, or severe, injury and electrical stimulation was applied 24 h later. Histological analyses of longitudinal sections showed that nociceptive stimulation triggered less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury. The results suggest that brain-dependent processes drive pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury (SCI).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6746957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67469572019-09-24 Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury Reynolds, Joshua A. Henwood, Melissa K. Turtle, Joel D. Baine, Rachel E. Johnston, David T. Grau, James W. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury, allowing blood to infiltrate the tissue. The present study examined whether these effects impact tissue rostral and caudal to the site of injury. In addition, the study evaluated whether cutting communication with the brain, by means of a rostral transection, affects the development of hemorrhage. Eighteen hours after rats received a lower thoracic (T11–12) contusion injury, half underwent a spinal transection at T2. Noxious electrical stimulation (shock) was applied 6 h later. Cellular assays showed that, in non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased hemoglobin content, activated pro-inflammatory cytokines and engaged signals related to cell death at the site of injury. These effects were not observed in transected animals. In the next experiment, the spinal transection was performed at the time of contusion injury. Nociceptive stimulation was applied 24 h later and tissue was sectioned for microscopy. In non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased the area of hemorrhage and this effect was blocked by spinal transection. These findings imply that the adverse effect of noxious stimulation depends upon spared ascending fibers and the activation of rostral (brain) systems. If true, stimulation should induce less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury that blocks transmission to the brain. To test this, rats were given a mild, moderate, or severe, injury and electrical stimulation was applied 24 h later. Histological analyses of longitudinal sections showed that nociceptive stimulation triggered less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury. The results suggest that brain-dependent processes drive pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury (SCI). Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6746957/ /pubmed/31551720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00044 Text en Copyright © 2019 Reynolds, Henwood, Turtle, Baine, Johnston and Grau. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Reynolds, Joshua A.
Henwood, Melissa K.
Turtle, Joel D.
Baine, Rachel E.
Johnston, David T.
Grau, James W.
Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
title Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
title_full Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
title_fullStr Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
title_full_unstemmed Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
title_short Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury
title_sort brain-dependent processes fuel pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6746957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00044
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsjoshuaa braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury
AT henwoodmelissak braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury
AT turtlejoeld braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury
AT bainerachele braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury
AT johnstondavidt braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury
AT graujamesw braindependentprocessesfuelpaininducedhemorrhageafterspinalcordinjury